Posted April 14, 2018
kusumahendra: I don't like people proposing "sure fire" method to win this game. I mentioned earlier how Fascist wants Liberals to lower their guard. Also, while it looks like a safer bet, it is still a bet. But I admit, Lift strategy looks good, so I'll take a closer look to how it will roll and vote according to situation.
So with this I just want to remind you all, Please be warned that the proposed method to win might also be a trap by fascist, so please calculate the risk and vote wisely
Now my question is, who are we going to pick as the next 2 Chancellors? A totally new person, or a tested one? Given the probability of electing at least 1F policy (I'm predicting the next two would be both 2F policies), should we risk creating doubt for a safe bet if he's unlucky to be given 2F cards, or should we use this chance to test the water with new people?
There are still two liberal cards. So technically we could win this game in the first round, without any fascist policy being passed.So with this I just want to remind you all, Please be warned that the proposed method to win might also be a trap by fascist, so please calculate the risk and vote wisely
Now my question is, who are we going to pick as the next 2 Chancellors? A totally new person, or a tested one? Given the probability of electing at least 1F policy (I'm predicting the next two would be both 2F policies), should we risk creating doubt for a safe bet if he's unlucky to be given 2F cards, or should we use this chance to test the water with new people?