Posted April 13, 2018
supplementscene: We also need to demand Presidents declare who they will investigate before they are elected and why they will investigate that person. ZFR needs to answer this.
errrrr.. No. For one thing, the president might want to inverstigate the chancellor based on how the policy went. For another he might want to to make his selection based on how voting went. I see no reason why the president should be forced to commit himself to a name before it comes to actually making this decision.
Your "ZFR needs to answer this." kind of gives me the impression you're trying to pick a fight. If I answer "scene" you could be "See!!! He was prejudiced against me".
I promise that, if it actually does come to it, I will not officially pick a name to investigate before having a complete discussion and be completely transparent about my choice.