ashwald: I didn't say you had a bias *against* them though. Biases can be either for or against, you know that already as demonstrated by the 2nd paragraph I just quoted. You picked and used the word "against" all by yourself. Curious.
Sorry, that "against" was a mistake, meant to write "for". But my point still stands. You got 2 posts each from RW and adalia (nothing from greek?), but you could have found similar posts (for me or against me): kusu nominating me for chancellor; dedo agreeing with me and being attacked by scene (post 117),
whomever random.org would have chose. There is really nothing special about the names random.org picked (and again, you're concentrating on 2 of them, forgetting greek).
It's like the fortune teller whose predictions are uncannily accurate after the fact. Your lucky colour is green and number 4, and only moments later you meet a friend a friend you haven't seen in 4 years outside a green Starbucks coffeeshop. But of course he could also be 32 yeras old, wearing a blue suit, with a red shirt, driving a white car with license plates beginning with 2 and ending with 7. Any number colour/combination would have worked.
Also, if you pick B (i.e. me carefully crafting that shitpost ),
ashwald: the possibility that you gave up one or zero teammates in order to make liberal(s) that appeared sympathetic to you look bad.
It just makes absolutely no sense. Why should I make those liberals sympathetic to me look bad? I'd be making myself look bad by association.
What I'm curious about is why your change of mind, now all of a sudden. You couldn't have missed my random.org reference when you went through the thread before (you couldn't have missed it because Brasas brought it up multiple times.) Why no mention of it before?
I'm wondering if
you who is the number 1 scum suspect after RW's ragequit, is now trying to bring down 2 liberals with you.