al281442: Wouldn't that in consequence mean we'd actually have to make sure to prevent him getting into this position of maybe being overthrown? Wouldn't we have to support his iron grip on the country because he is that one weirdo with the big red button...?
Call me an interventionist but I can't follow. If we always let the bullies have their way to enjoy one more moment of peace and quiet in the present it won't get us anywhere better. It's that Munich 1938 thing.
Indeed the stakes are high right now. It's kinda balancing on a knife's edge.
I surely don't think it's fair to ask everyone to be like Nawalny (who is miraculously not dead). But for example in Russia if you want to do just one little thing tell friends and family to read Nowaja Gaseta / Новая газета instead of Vlad's papers. Do it privately. Thankfully surveillance in Russia is not (yet?) as strict as in other authoritarian systems. They don't have spies at every corner like the old GDR. They don't have cyber-whatnot like today's China.
It's got to start at some point.
I think it's a jarring game of opposing him (otherwise he'll feel like he can do whatever the heck he wants), but not to the point where he gets so desperate that he'll want to press that button.
We need to make him afraid, but not desperate.
That's the kind of crazy distinction you get to have to make when a psycho gets his hands on the launch codes. Ain't it fun?
Personally, if I was the US/EU, without actually attacking his troops in Eastern Ukraine, I'd stick my troops in Western and center Ukraine and dare him to advance further. I'd think he's back down somewhat, but lets be real, the fate of the world would be on that gamble so I kind of understand that they don't want to do that (try to explain to your constituents that you're willing to risk most of them dying over the fate of another country ;). I have a temper. Probably wouldn't make the best of leaders anyhow.