Linko64: That's an awful idea. The thing GoG needs now and has done for the last two years, is more focus on the users directly spending money and interacting with the service. You can't try to nurture and grow the forums, or even maintain if you're gating it off with the requirement for purchase.
As for the reviews, it's hard to keep on top of the bombing in all truth.
falloutttt: I don't think you understand how this can get out of hand real fast if they do nothing about it.
We will all be well informed about circumcision and reproductive organs in general in every review and forum thread. This will be everywhere.
And i don't think buying one or two games is that big of a requirement. What the hell people come here if it's not about buying and playing games.
Given I worked there and spent a fair chunk of my days often trying to figure out how to stop troll reviews, even getting flak from OneAngryGamer and some subb reddits, i think I do mate.
It's really not as simple as just deleting them and moving on. If users want to review bomb, they're going to do it, with multiple accounts. Ask anyone who remembers Le-Peroux (?) and the anime-like games.
I would assume this is why Epic is taking their approach to user reviews...and the recent changes at Rotten Tomatoes, even if we're going outside of video games here.
They come here to ask questions, it's a gateway to the service and the community, which is already niche to start off with.