It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
The moment you’ve been waiting for – The Talos Principle 2 is now available on GOG with a -50% launch discount!

The Talos Principle 2 is a thought-provoking first-person puzzle experience that greatly expands on the first game's philosophical themes and stunning environments with increasingly mind-bending challenges.

You can also get The Talos Principle 2 - Road to Elysium Pack (-20%), The Talos Principle 2 Deluxe Edition (-40%) and The Talos Principle 2 Soundtrack (-50%).

All launch discounts end on October 24th, 1 PM UTC

Now on GOG!
avatar
GOG.com: Release: The Talos Principle 2
avatar
BreOl72: I remember playing the first one. I don't think I ever completed it.
Isn't really my cup of tea.
Don't just write that here, man! Put that incredibly useful information in a review! =D
avatar
idbeholdME: Same here. Felt like it started dragging on quite a bit for its own good. Think I played through like 66-75% of it, but just dropped it one day and never felt the need to finish it. The philosophical mumbo-jumbo also really didn't grab me that much. I'm not opposed to puzzle games with stories, but something like Magrunner for example grabbed me way more.
Pretty much the same with me, I played Talos Principle after the Stanley Parable and, while they are not exactly similar games, I felt more like a chore to finish the game compared to the enthusiasm of finding new routes and being mind fucked by the Stanley Parable.
Maybe I am missing a lot by not finishing the Talos Principle, maybe one day?

Edit: just remembered that regarding puzzle games with story, I enjoyed much more the first Portal game than the second, not sure if it's because the first is somewhat very short and the second drags a bit. Both great games though.
Post edited 6 hours ago by Dark_art_
avatar
Xeshra: Ah yes, the game is a UE5 game... which can be seen, a lot of details everywhere, surely a "eye candy".
avatar
idbeholdME: I suspect that is the main reason for the bloated size. The original Talos Principle was still running on their in-house engine - the Serious Engine. Which at the time was still pretty technically adept and before they lost the main guy responsible for its development. Seems like they decided to drop the ball (and headaches) associated with maintaining your own engine and jumped ships for UE.
Developers. everywhere, are increasingly jumping on the "UE5" or "Unity" bandwagon, as it seems to make stuff easyer for them using a "normalized" environment. On the other hand, we start to see less diversity when it comes to the engine and somehow the unique touch may slowly become lost. The textures are still unique of course but somehow the tools used for it are slowly becoming "equal" in some way... so in the end the graphical diversity is somehow becoming reduced.

Even Square Enix was using UE4 for a lot of games, although, on FF16 they was using a rare custom engine still.

I think Talos 1 and Talos 2, both are graphically impressive. Taken into account the first Talos is already 9 years of age it is actually even the winner. Anyway, Talos is Talos... even the newest Title is another great game on a great engine which is demanding a lot of resources.
Post edited 6 hours ago by Xeshra
avatar
Xeshra: I think Talos 1 and Talos 2, both are graphically impressive. Taken into account the first Talos is already 9 years of age it is actually even the winner. Anyway, Talos is Talos... even the newest Title is another great game on a great engine which is demanding a lot of resources.
From what I remember back then, the Talos Principle was used as a graphic benchmark, both by computer parts benchmarkers because it was heavy and game "journalists" because the high fidelity at the time.
Got this on steam as I wasn't sure it would make it here, but now...

YOINK!

Anothert game for my de-steamed pile ironically located in my steam launcher! x^D
avatar
Xeshra: Developers. everywhere, are increasingly jumping on the "UE5" or "Unity" bandwagon, as it seems to make stuff easyer for them using a "normalized" environment. On the other hand, we start to see less diversity when it comes to the engine and somehow the unique touch may slowly become lost. The textures are still unique of course but somehow the tools used for it are slowly becoming "equal" in some way... so in the end the graphical diversity is somehow becoming reduced.
Very true. Added an edit to my previous post. Just to sum up - Croteam lost their main engine guy in 2019, which I think led to the death of Serious Engine.

Serious Engine 3 (and 3.5) overall felt more polished than 4.
https://www.gog.com/wishlist/games/serious_sam_2
https://www.gog.com/wishlist/games/serious_sam_3_bfe
https://www.gog.com/wishlist/games/serious_sam_hd_the_first_encounter
https://www.gog.com/wishlist/games/serious_sam_hd_the_second_encounter
I'm happy for everyone here who's into this kind of game.
I saw a first review and it said it's a really, really good and well-designed title. But unfortunately it's not really my cup of tea so I might buy it sometime in a deep sale.
avatar
Xeshra: Developers. everywhere, are increasingly jumping on the "UE5" or "Unity" bandwagon, as it seems to make stuff easyer for them using a "normalized" environment. On the other hand, we start to see less diversity when it comes to the engine and somehow the unique touch may slowly become lost. The textures are still unique of course but somehow the tools used for it are slowly becoming "equal" in some way... so in the end the graphical diversity is somehow becoming reduced.

Even Square Enix was using UE4 for a lot of games, although, on FF16 they was using a rare custom engine still.

I think Talos 1 and Talos 2, both are graphically impressive. Taken into account the first Talos is already 9 years of age it is actually even the winner. Anyway, Talos is Talos... even the newest Title is another great game on a great engine which is demanding a lot of resources.
Honestly, I think it makes a lot of sense that most devs should not reinvent the wheel and use an existing engine, especially if they are not highly knowledgeable about that to begin with.

This is such a common base for games and yet, also a huge very technical overhead, plus not a huge differentiation for a lot of games (unless you approach it with a lot of technical expertise and a singular vision, you're unlikely to do a better job than existing established game engines with the time you have).

Realistically, the creation of game engines should probably rightfully be delegated to either communities of tinkerers or studios with deep pockets and lots of resources to hire teams with the right know-how.

So I understand why smaller studios like them would want to explore existing solutions.

My main beef with unreal/unity situation is: Why aren't there more established open-sources alternatives yet and why aren't more devs using them? This kind of common widespread building block need tends to be the most fertile ground for robust open-source solutions to emerge where a lot of people contributes to said solutions (with time or money) because it fulfills their needs and that spreads the load a lot.
Post edited 3 hours ago by Magnitus