SultanOfSuave: There are two entries for this game on HLTB. One for the prologue (the demo) and one for the complete title, which states 15 hours for completion. It took be a little longer than this because I was doing things other than playing the game whilst it was open. Depending on the how the players familiarity with the genre, 15-25 hours for a first time playthrough seems about right. The price tag reflects the game length, after all. It's an RPG created by one developer, not a double or triple A title where one might expect thrice that game length.

Gudadantza: Indeed, the 3,5h seems to be the Prologue/demo version.

Maybe I am a slow player but I am at the beginning of the full game second chapter and I have marked more than 11h for now.

The HLTB is just an overall guide. In my experience it use to be always longer times

SultanOfSuave: Some of the map design is likely reflected by the developers heritage. Reminiscent of a Baltic island with Norweign geography: highly mountainous islands whose shores are heavily shaped by deep fjords (the landscape is even referred to as a fjord on one occasion); inhabited by hostile, sea-faring, barbaric people who fight with fury in a frenzy, that could be analogous to how a foreigner may see the Vikings of old. I've beaten the game now, so if you wanted to know something about it, perhaps I could be of assisstance.

Breja: Now imagine how cool this game would be if the graphics weren't like that nightmare about being back in school.

SultanOfSuave: It is easy to get bogged down in character creation trying to create the most optimised character. Especially in the Owlcat pathfinder games, where it's more complex, there is more choice, and the game is much longer. The best thing I find to remember is that it's a role playing game after all, so such games are balanced accordingly. That is, they are normally balanced so that a player can overcome the challenges regardless of how they play or which class they prefer. The exception being for players wanting the most fierce challenge possible, then efficient and optimal stat distribution may be required. Your character should be sufficiently adequate if you reason with your best judgement.

SultanOfSuave: It's an RPG created by one developer, not a double or triple A title where one might expect thrice that game length.

Quantum_Quark: Jeff Vogel is able to make decent length simplistic RPGS by themselves, so I guess it varies from person to person

eric5h5: Not by himself; he outsources graphics and sound.

Cavalary: Yeah, we are going off topic, but since you asked, I remember that several years ago I was looking into what was available for this socket and saying that the i7-5775C was the only one that'd have been worth the trouble, being quad core. But it really wasn't worth the cost. And as of some 5 years ago I gave up on any thought of doing anything to this computer unless I'll be able to keep that part for the next one, really not worth the trouble.
And besides, it does well enough for what I generally need, and do have quite a number of games in my backlog that work fine on it, and for quite a number of others the problem is the OS, Win 7 and especially since it's 32-bit (64-bit would just increase the RAM use and that'd be a problem when it's limited to begin with), and most definitely don't want any reinstall. So basically just... I wouldn't even say necessarily looking for, but mainly curious about what other interesting games may run on it as it is, while it'll still work and I'll still be using it, not to do anything to it to make more work.
So that's also why it's a bit annoying when a game that should have low requirements has artificially higher ones because of poor optimization or the engine used or even just because the dev doesn't test on older stuff so just lists way more than is actually needed and offers no support in case of any problems if you have less. And again, the OS part comes before the hardware part.