Yeah, Windows 10 is a beast using computer resources, not only RAM but constant disk I/O and CPU cycles. I use Linux 10+ years and never I thought having computers using less energy running Linux than Windows and yet, here we are.

I assume the game itself don't use more than 500MB of RAM, being 231MB by itself. I can be wrong though, as I usually am :)

Don't get me wrong, I'm not a "PC MasterRace" evengelist, exactly the opposite. Stated requirements are just generic guides to avoid trouble, my personal opinion on the matter involves a few swear words and calling a few names to whoever writes them.

Haha :P
Yes makes a lot of sense.

...

It's just something modern built to look like old games after all.

Quoting Breja: "Or, shocking as it may be, not everyone is blinded by nostalgia."
I cannot express how much this makes sense to me, this whole retro trend (not only in video games) was fun for a while, we're well past that point.

BTW, a bit off topic but something I would like to ask you ages ago. I recall your pc being powered by a old pentium CPU, may be able to get you a bit more powerfull i3 or i5, would you be interested in changing the CPU yourself?

So I guess the 8bit refers to the Computer and the colour palette to the C64. That does look like way more colours than back in the C64 days.
And it does look way more like VGA Krynn or Gateway of the savage frontier than EGA me thinks.
But I've been wrong before.

Subjective opinion is subjective. I can't understand why would people want to buy game with achievements either.
Dear gods, are we really going to discuss/comment about perceived beauty of such shallow thing such as graphics? Have we became so shallow? True beauty comes from inside people! Haven't we learned that from cartoons as kids?

It looks like the first two Krynn games, the EGA ones, but with Those brown colors classic in the C64 palette here and there

But to test it you need to look at the proper background scenes. Not exactly to the world tile based map. Compare one of the still illustrations in Dark Knights of Krynn and the ones in this game.

Oh. And about the performance if you fit the relatively medium high reqs for a game like this it does not tax excesively your rig. It does not make your fans crawl like other Unity games. But in the options/menu screen the game weirdly lags your mouse. It could be worse.

Fun, addictive, charming and modern interface wise. Any fan of old school, Ultima or Gold box kind of games should be playing this game. But it can be played like any latter generation of RPG. Pillars of Eternity, Dragon Age etc...because of the more modern UI concept (unified inventory, flexible and configurable difficulty options, weapon stats comparison like in action ARPG etc...)

Loving what I am playing so far.

Ah, so you selected "the door number one", Unity as the company, the thing I already know about.

Thanks for the reply!

Is the offline installation file the correct version??? It says version 0.4.4. Almost sounds like a demo or beta version. I always thought release versions started at 1.0.

To the best of my knowledge, yes. I also asked the same question to myself. In game, it states that the version is 1.0.3d

THANK YOU! I'll go ahead and install it then.

Have a great weekend and enjoy the game!! (and thanks again).

You're welcome. Considering that your time is more precious than mine, it would be remiss of me to not advise you that I would recommend patience for the average consumer, and wait until next patch for full enjoyment. Take care!

The keyboard on that particular laptop isn't working at the moment.
On my small laptop, it would lag the mouse to the point of being unusable. (Frame times might have reached 1 second or more.)

Yeah, we are going off topic, but since you asked, I remember that several years ago I was looking into what was available for this socket and saying that the i7-5775C was the only one that'd have been worth the trouble, being quad core. But it really wasn't worth the cost. And as of some 5 years ago I gave up on any thought of doing anything to this computer unless I'll be able to keep that part for the next one, really not worth the trouble.
And besides, it does well enough for what I generally need, and do have quite a number of games in my backlog that work fine on it, and for quite a number of others the problem is the OS, Win 7 and especially since it's 32-bit (64-bit would just increase the RAM use and that'd be a problem when it's limited to begin with), and most definitely don't want any reinstall. So basically just... I wouldn't even say necessarily looking for, but mainly curious about what other interesting games may run on it as it is, while it'll still work and I'll still be using it, not to do anything to it to make more work.
So that's also why it's a bit annoying when a game that should have low requirements has artificially higher ones because of poor optimization or the engine used or even just because the dev doesn't test on older stuff so just lists way more than is actually needed and offers no support in case of any problems if you have less. And again, the OS part comes before the hardware part.