What makes you think this is not DRM-free? Both the base game and its DLC come in offline installers as they should.

Imagine the hubris required to put out most generic, cheap-RPG-maker-looking-ass game imaginable for $23AU and then trying to monetize the crap out of it with DLC.

I feel differently...if some people want to criticize something then why not let them? Also how does someone expressing dissatisfaction about something stop other people from enjoying those things?

(aside: I find the belief some seem to hold that random words on some section of the net will affect reality somewhat interesting. Like one person says "this game should be banned/not sold!" and someone will reply "stop trying to take people's games away!" As if the second person thinks the first person can change reality just by uttering/typing something)

Okay ... go ahead - continue to be negative and spreading negativity in all threads of games you dislike.
Oh my ... and I thought GOG was aimed at adults. I am out.

If I feel something warrants criticism(and sometimes mockery) then I usually express how I feel.

One valid criticism would be on the listed title's mtx DLC. Should we not express our feelings on it lest we create negativity or should we (consumers) make our concerns known? Being purely pleasant doesn't always work...sometimes it takes a squeaky wheel to get the grease. Also not everyone is going to like everything someone else does...that's just life, and (imo) they have every right to be heard alongside the ones posting positive comments.

I grew up with a C=64 (and have one on the table about 20 inches from where I'm sitting). There, the crackers, striving to create a more pimped up version of a game than the competition, often offered you "See the end sequence now?" The thing was, though, the crackers were doing it for free.