It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Jazz up your collection.


Jazz Jackrabbit: The Complete Collection and Jazz Jackrabbit 2: The Complete Collection are now available DRM-free on GOG.com with a 10% launch discount until December 7, 2PM UTC. Or get them together with Epic Pinball for a neat 25% discount.
He's green, he's lean, he's got some crazy speed: Jazz Jackrabbit, the intergalactic lagomorph with the red bandana and gung-ho attitude is back, exclusively on GOG.com. Both of his bombastic outings were hailed as platform shooter classics back when they were first unleashed upon the world, partly thanks to their tight mechanics and vibrant visuals and partly for their swanky protagonist and addictive soundtrack.

The GOG.com edition of Jazz Jackrabbit 2 can also come pre-bundled with the incredible JJ2+ mod. Packing years of dedication from the Jazz Jackrabbit community, expanded multiplayer features and game modes, tons of fixes, as well as tools to play (and create) the huge library of community-made content.
Download Jazz Jackrabbit 2 with the JJ2+ mod through the Beta Channels feature in GOG Galaxy or by grabbing the appropriate offline installers directly from your GOG.com account.
You can find more about Beta branches here.


If you're looking for an extra dose of platforming and pinball goodness, check out our Special Sale - but be quick, it ends December 1st, 11PM UTC!
It must have been released between the time I used and Amiga and when I used a PC as I have no fond memories of this. Reading through the thread shows many do so thank you GoG on their behalf and for the games that I do remember fondly.
avatar
Lucian_Galca: Vote for the other older Epic Games titles!

ZZT
Super ZZT
Kiloblaster
OverKill
Electroman
Xargon
Ken's Labyrinth
One Must Fall 2097
Robbo
avatar
ChainsawGenie: All of these games have, actually, been released as freeware by their authors.

Feel free to seek them out and enjoy (via Dosbox). ^_^
Just my opinion but it would still be cool that GOG could still release these games as freebies every now and then. Makes seeking these games out and setting things up so the games are playable less of a hassle. Also a lot of people would still appreciate the very sweet gesture, even though you could set up the games yourself.

I mean after all, GOG sometimes does release freebies but it almost feels like that these times are gone and its a shame. One of the reasons I joined this site was because I wanted to replay Tyrian 2000 and BASS :D!
avatar
ChainsawGenie: All of these games have, actually, been released as freeware by their authors.

Feel free to seek them out and enjoy (via Dosbox). ^_^
avatar
Dray2k: Just my opinion but it would still be cool that GOG could still release these games as freebies every now and then. Makes seeking these games out and setting things up so the games are playable less of a hassle. Also a lot of people would still appreciate the very sweet gesture, even though you could set up the games yourself.

I mean after all, GOG sometimes does release freebies but it almost feels like that these times are gone and its a shame. One of the reasons I joined this site was because I wanted to replay Tyrian 2000 and BASS :D!
Sometimes they still do freebies, though just sometimes, which is to be expected, if they wanna keep themselves afloat :)

But of course, who would refuse a freebie from time to time :)
Post edited December 02, 2017 by Tarhiel
So am I correct in assuming that the JJ2+ installer is all you need? I downloaded all three installers, but they all seem to play the same game, except for the holiday one, which installed a separate shortcut, even though the holiday game is already in JJ2, but seems to have its own separate list of homebrew levels.
avatar
pmcollectorboy: So am I correct in assuming that the JJ2+ installer is all you need? I downloaded all three installers, but they all seem to play the same game, except for the holiday one, which installed a separate shortcut, even though the holiday game is already in JJ2, but seems to have its own separate list of homebrew levels.
JJ2+ only had one epsiode and custom levels when I tried it. I used Jazz 1, Jazz 2 & Jazz 2 CC (Not sure if Jazz 2 has the same content that CC has already, but the menus are different in Jazz 2 & Jazz 2 CC (Xmasy.)
Post edited December 02, 2017 by Pond86
high rated
avatar
Klumpen0815: I do and some still hold up pretty well in spite of certain flaws - others not so much.
avatar
Tarhiel: Anachronism all the way.
Next time you can rebuke Beethoven for not having Twitter.
Reviews are meant to be helpful for prospective buyers NOW -- people who have never played the game before, or who only played it decades ago, and remember it poorly. Having the top "most-helpful"-rated reviews on an old game (not talking about these specifically) be some variation of "I used to play this on my cousin's computer when I was 5! I still remember the music, and that one cool level!!! THANK YOU GOG!!!!!" is not helpful in the slightest. It might make fellow fans feel warm and fuzzy, but it's irrelevant on a store page.

I'm okay with a bit of nostalgia in user reviews, as long as the reviews give some actual information, not just "This is a REAL game, not like all those modern games for BABIES, with their 'good graphics' and their 'playability'." There are too many people who seem to confuse liking a game with that game being good -- to be unwilling to admit that the most favoritestest game of their childhood might have been objectively mediocre for its time, or even bad. And even games that were truly good back in the day haven't always held up well, as Klumpen pointed out. And that's another problem: people being unwilling to admit that their perception of a game is colored by the fact that it's associated with their youth, and that the golden glow it has for them might not be visible to someone looking at it for the first time, especially if that someone wasn't even around games during the relevant era.

Personally, I'm cautious about even rating things that I haven't played/watched/listened to/read recently; I wouldn't dream of writing a review for a piece of entertainment media I hadn't experienced in twenty years. (And no, watching a video of someone else playing a game doesn't qualify one to write a review of the game -- only of that video. :P )

Sorry about all the words.

P.S.: That Beethoven analogy is awful.
avatar
HunchBluntley: P.S.: That Beethoven analogy is awful.
I didn't even deem it worthy a reply.

Thanks for clearing things up in your post, exactly my thoughts although I guess it may fall on deaf ears.
avatar
Tarhiel: Anachronism all the way.
Next time you can rebuke Beethoven for not having Twitter.
avatar
HunchBluntley: Reviews are meant to be helpful for prospective buyers NOW -- people who have never played the game before, or who only played it decades ago, and remember it poorly. Having the top "most-helpful"-rated reviews on an old game (not talking about these specifically) be some variation of "I used to play this on my cousin's computer when I was 5! I still remember the music, and that one cool level!!! THANK YOU GOG!!!!!" is not helpful in the slightest. It might make fellow fans feel warm and fuzzy, but it's irrelevant on a store page.

I'm okay with a bit of nostalgia in user reviews, as long as the reviews give some actual information, not just "This is a REAL game, not like all those modern games for BABIES, with their 'good graphics' and their 'playability'." There are too many people who seem to confuse liking a game with that game being good -- to be unwilling to admit that the most favoritestest game of their childhood might have been objectively mediocre for its time, or even bad. And even games that were truly good back in the day haven't always held up well, as Klumpen pointed out. And that's another problem: people being unwilling to admit that their perception of a game is colored by the fact that it's associated with their youth, and that the golden glow it has for them might not be visible to someone looking at it for the first time, especially if that someone wasn't even around games during the relevant era.

Personally, I'm cautious about even rating things that I haven't played/watched/listened to/read recently; I wouldn't dream of writing a review for a piece of entertainment media I hadn't experienced in twenty years. (And no, watching a video of someone else playing a game doesn't qualify one to write a review of the game -- only of that video. :P )

Sorry about all the words.

P.S.: That Beethoven analogy is awful.
Well, if that´s the case, then we are talking about two different things:
If you´re talking about those small shout outs, those barks, I agree with you that appropriate place for them would be here, in general discussion and that it´s not a review.

What I had in mind when responding to BrandeX was a real review, where people will write a few meaningful sentences about the game.

But I stand by to what I wrote to Klumpen0815 - that judging old games with nowadays standards is way off.

Because it was these games, which either because they were successful (meant bought and played by many, though not always that had to be the case) or well known, helped shaped the nowadays standards - so dissing them for not adhering to changes made over time to these standards is nothing short of anachronism.

And you are absolutely right - some of them have aspects which are hard to get to or are as a whole outright obsolete.

But back to the reviews - Why a person who played a game 10 years ago couldn´t write a review about it and couldn´t say he had a good time? Does that make him a bad reviewer, just because he haven´t played that particular game last week?
I don´t think so. Majority of people, who bought these older titles have played them in the past (as a child/ when they were younger), and only minority will buy these games (those, which are young now) without ever having experience them in the first place (why would they, when there are so many newer games, with nicer graphics out there?).

Also (and I am reacting now to the to BrandeX´s post, which I reacted to in a first place - which is why we are having this conversation), I don´t like when people are using word "nostalgia" as a synonym with negative connotations, equal to somebody with purple tinted glasses - just because you had a good experience with a game in the past doesn´t mean you´re oblivious to its shortcomings - you would remember them, just as you remember the good parts. And I would expect you to mention them in a review. Nor does it mean you should be automatically disqualified writing about them.

There´s much higher chance that people who haven´t played them in the time when they were produced, will upbraid stuff which were common at that time, out of their own ignorance.

Hence, the Beethoven - twitter analogy.
And if you deem it awful, well - awful analogy for an awful argument.

And I do hope this will not fall on a deaf ears - I, for one, was reading closely :)
Post edited December 03, 2017 by Tarhiel
avatar
Tarhiel: But back to the reviews - Why a person who played a game 10 years ago couldn´t write a review about it and couldn´t say he had a good time? Does that make him a bad reviewer, just because he haven´t played that particular game last week?
I don´t think so. Majority of people, who bought these older titles have played them in the past (as a child/ when they were younger), and only minority will buy these games (those, which are young now) without ever having experience them in the first place (why would they, when there are so many newer games, with nicer graphics out there?).
But that minority is the reason reviews exist. Reviews are to tell people what a game is like so they get an idea whether they'd be interested or not. It's not a porch for people to sit on and reminisce to each other about their childhoods.
avatar
Tarhiel: But back to the reviews - Why a person who played a game 10 years ago couldn´t write a review about it and couldn´t say he had a good time? Does that make him a bad reviewer, just because he haven´t played that particular game last week?
I don´t think so. Majority of people, who bought these older titles have played them in the past (as a child/ when they were younger), and only minority will buy these games (those, which are young now) without ever having experience them in the first place (why would they, when there are so many newer games, with nicer graphics out there?).
avatar
stevethepocket: But that minority is the reason reviews exist. Reviews are to tell people what a game is like so they get an idea whether they'd be interested or not. It's not a porch for people to sit on and reminisce to each other about their childhoods.
Good point, but if they are reminiscing about what a good game it is, aren't they essentially reviewing it?
avatar
Lucian_Galca: One Must Fall 2097
I agree with this one.
avatar
Tesp84: Thank you, GOG!
I've been waiting years for these two gems to release here :)

Is it a normal issue that JJ2+ only makes The Secret Files and Homecooked Levels available in singleplayer mode?
I have the same issue. I installed the game normally, then I activated the beta branch and selected jj2+. Only The Secret Files and Home Cooked levels appear. How can i solve it?
Today they hotfixed the episodes for jazz2. Auto-update should be enabled, but make sure to look at your settings. Thanks to GOG for the quick fix!
avatar
Tesp84: Thank you, GOG!
I've been waiting years for these two gems to release here :)

Is it a normal issue that JJ2+ only makes The Secret Files and Homecooked Levels available in singleplayer mode?
avatar
maxstrike: I have the same issue. I installed the game normally, then I activated the beta branch and selected jj2+. Only The Secret Files and Home Cooked levels appear. How can i solve it?
We've updated the game via Galaxy and we've updated the offline installers today with a fix that should solve your problem. Please update the game either via Galaxy or download the new installer from your library and re-install the game :)

If you experience any other issues, please click the "Support" button on the top bar and send us a ticket :)
avatar
maxstrike: I have the same issue. I installed the game normally, then I activated the beta branch and selected jj2+. Only The Secret Files and Home Cooked levels appear. How can i solve it?
avatar
JudasIscariot: We've updated the game via Galaxy and we've updated the offline installers today with a fix that should solve your problem. Please update the game either via Galaxy or download the new installer from your library and re-install the game :)

If you experience any other issues, please click the "Support" button on the top bar and send us a ticket :)
Thank you so much! Works fine now.