My entire response to your response to my statement could be summed up as: you didn't
fully understand my points & "do yr darn research before u say something".
So I'll try to keep this short.
(u know what, I overflowed char limit so my response will be split in 2, please don't respond until both parts are live)
P 1/2
Perhaps it didn't occur to u but I'm not the kind of person to talk things made out of thin air.
I hv made extensive research before writing this and on top of that I know the things I'm talking about here.
So with all due respect, I know what I'm talking about.
B1tF1ghter: And I am not trying to drag people here in one platform or the other. I am simply offering you an explanation of a perspective that too many people can never see clearly.
timppu: Thanks for the condescending tone
I get that u think of yourself so highly that u think everybody else thinks like u, but u're wrong, my tone was not supposed to ever sound patronizing nor condensending. So if u see it that way, I apologize.
timppu: but no, you have no idea how others think.
1.U don't know what I know. U cannot speak about everyone in that regard.
2.YOU actually have NO CLUE WHATSOEVER how I think. So congratulations, yr statement immediatelly backfired. And since u seem quick to jump to conclusions - I hv nothing personally against u.
timppu: You are not any "wiser" than the rest of us.
Oh, so you're representing entire humanity or something now?
I never implied I am smarter than EVERYBODY. But don't even try to publicly imply I'm dumb.
U're playing with your matches too close to a tank of gasoline named "forum conduct". I will let this slip just this once but consider yourself warned.
Do you think about yourself as some supreme being who can judge my intelligence other the internet now?
Because, pay attention, I actually have NOT implied ANYTHING about intelligence of ANYBODY here. Pay special attention to the wording in my messages because I choose specific one to make clear enough points.
timppu: 1.(...)So while you may be replacing the media in which you keep your archives files (e.g. games) may and will be replaced several times during 40 years, the cost of keeping those old archives around will become increasingly cheaper
I don't know if u managed to notice but when 16 GiB pendrives are a thing u cannot exactly get 1 GiB ones for 1/16 of the price of 16 GiB ones.
Your point is incorrect, over the years price per GiB of physical media gets lower, but u need to spend a specific minimal amount of money for at least a minimal available tier of storage capacity (moving target, 250 GiB > 500 GiB > 1 TiB, and so on, changing over the years, as in: LOWEST CAPACITY storage media AVAILABLE atm) and that price value doesn't really change much. That's exactly what MY point was about.
Also, on the subject of USB pendrives, they are NOT suitable for longterm backups by any means. But I don't feel like writing an essay on degradation of flash memory cells and how manufacteurs use the crappiest controlers in existence for those here so u will hv to excuse my sudden cut of this topic.
timppu: 2.(...)solar beam(...)
Solar flare is an acutal term whereas solar beam is not exactly fyi.
Your entire response here didn't actually void my point. I never said "the ONE drive u hv backup on". I said "your backup".
U are free to be blissfully ignorant and not understand that even tho possibility is pretty low it's STILL possible for all your backup drives to fail at the same time. There are plenty of stories about such occurences on dedicated data archiving forums.
My point remains the same.
timppu: 3.(...)how do you know which ones are beforehand?
Research, gameplay watching, etc.
Besides, it only reinforces my point that game Z should be HERE day one. Otherwise incentive to buy it here dies when time passes.
If game Z is available here on day one then at least I hv a CHOICE. Which wasn't presented for HZD for 3 entire months.
timppu: about the costs of cloud storage
(...)
I have been under the impression that with the aforementioned big cloud services you mainly pay only for the used resources
(...)
Judging by your responses I can safely assume u have not much or none at all knowledge about cloud providers.
So here is a brief for u:
ENTERPRISE offerings (meant almost ONLY for enterprise clients) such as AWS S3 Storage, or Glacier for that matter, they offer more fine grained payments and financial opportunities, such as per GiB transferred /& stored as well as "per duration of storage" - in VERY fine grained scale.
But there are some major caveats for using those and they are GENERALLY not suitable for a costumer grade backup (for a backup that frequently grows and is accessed on irregular intervals with irregular transfers requiring varying bandwidth).
Pricing of enterprise offerings is lucrative but it's only worth it if you can assure consistent cloud storage interactions.
Because if you don't, if for example you get tier that is cheap for irregular transfers, and then you one day have to offload vast majority of stored data in upload or download (to or from the server) your wallet is going to beg for mercy.
Unless you can utilise some clever, VERY fundamentally strategically planned UNIX tricks this kind of offering is just NOT FOR COSTUMER GRADE backups.
So NO, you cannot just dump a backup of say HZD to S3.
(edit: moved some data from P2 to P1)