I think this deserves a thread of its own, including the three English links, as the list is bound to increase in size.

In memory of your good old days, you could call the thread: "News websites that treat GOG as a second class DRM store".

Yes! And that's why nobody should ever listen to the self defeating dummies who criticize people for "making a fuss" and suggest they should just "vote with the wallet".

Not buying something does nothing. Making a fuss can sometimes be enough to ignite change.

I would say the biggest jokes of this thread are the prepared statements from the blues. But those are neither good or even funny for that matter...

I wonder whether opening up the article with "Good News!™" was intentional or not... I'm guessing the latter, but it's a nice touch!

I thought it was intentional. The guy seems too knowledgeable for an uninvolved journalist.

Just a stupid idea I had.

i wonder if 47 became bald, right after he saw the state in which gog released hitman 2016 goty?

I can't imagine having Hitman GOTY is lining GOG's pocketbooks. Everyone could have bought it elsewhere a long time ago. Yet they foolishly threw away their reputation (and customers) over the game.

So why did GOG do it? I really don't get it.

I think it comes down to management being incompetent. Just look at all of the blunders they've made in the last few years.

edit- fixed some grammar

a theory..

maybe GOG got's hacked and these hackers uploaded malicious content and spreading nonsense to their website just to damage GOG's reputation?

so it is safer not to download something or making any payments here at the moment.

Because it isn't just about this one game, it is about the precedent. This is the logical flaw many people seem to be making. If GOG can get away with pushing the boundaries of 'DRM-free' with this game, then it will open the door to many more similar examples, which combined, may add up to a sizeable amount of revenue for GOG.

This is why it is very important that GOG's customer base does not let them get away with it.

(the people in charge of the store don't place any value on their DRM-free reputation, because it doesn't appear on their balance sheet. Also, they think their customers are mindless sheep that will gobble up anything, given that is how they treat us. However, I suspect they are seriously wrong on that point.)

I never told that, please, read carefully. The word "anymore" has question mark next to it.
My question was: why any game page (well, almost, see below), including those dreaded Hitman release, has exactly these keypoints: "Why buy on GOG.COM? DRM FREE. No activation or online connection required to play. Safety and satisfaction. Stellar support 24/7 and full refunds up to 30 days. ", but one of these just two magically lost here?

OK, just one answer, just to clarify, but not to feed.

CD PROJEKT RED - is a parent company for GOG store.

Every store game page (well, almost, see below) reads: no DRM. To customers.

Presentation site of parent company say about their GOG store much, but no word about DRM. To business partners, I guess.

I don't imply, I just look at fact, that at business level we see the very different priorities. And, for the Lord, it's not evidence, it's just the fact. Everyone could make it evidence, though. Or not. True or false one. With screams, or silently.

Hmm, GWENT page does not have those "Why buy on GOG.COM" banner, so no word about DRM. [But I see no problem here, as the game is: a) complement to universe, and b) free.]

Not sure if this falls into the denial-phase or the bargaining-phase of the Kübler-Ross model. ;-P