As I've said, everyone is free to believe whatever they want... doesn't make it true however. As I've also said before, GOG has never included unrestricted multiplayer in their DRM free motto, it quite clear it always reffered to playing single player and being able to install it without restrictions. One of the first games here was Sacrifice, back when GOG began, that had a CD key for playing online according to Grargar. If I believed online multiplayer could have DRM, then I would surely count that as DRM as well. If people were so against this so called type of DRM in online multiplayer they should have stood against it then, not now with Galaxy how many years later. At this point is done and over.

Take care though, we'll agree to disagree.

Thanks! I was afraid of something like that. GOGs database model must be a major pain.

Indeed! Sadly GOG does not support him the least.

That's exactly the problem with these proprietary multiplayer systems, they more and more kill the open multiplayer modes like LAN or dedicated server. When such a platform closes the multiplayer mode of the game is lost.
If GOG still were fighting against DRM as active as they once did they could have implemented a more open multiplayer solution and not another monopoly system to lock in customers.

Such as getting used to DRM in all music or games a few years ago? That's indeed a good argument. ;)

That is why GOG.com initial exists: No DRM at all. And it seems the participants here having "no problem with that" have forgotten about API-dependencies, so an installation of this game here also needs Galaxy or some parts of it - nice to have this one day on Linux ... NOT. But hey: The client took over the thinking and management of software. :-)

Regarding to one of your previous posts, I'm like you - don't need a client to keep my games updated, useless babysitting to me and the achievements can go to hell if I may say so.

The Crypt of the Necrodancer release was a wakeup call, the dev didn't release the Linux version due to the lack of Galaxy on the platform (although later amended). I wouldn't be surprised if these 2 games are linked to this "problem" since they both have multiplayer.

Yes that is a major problem and if GOG now fails making a clear statement what Galaxy should become in the future we have here another DRM-platform in the making. Of course: After finishing this posting there will be more participants in here trying to tell me that online-multiplayer has nothing to do with DRM. :-)

As I said above, you act like GOG has always been fighting again online multiplayer DRM (which again I don't see it as)... they haven't. That is clear since one of the first games here had cd keys for online multiplayer. Not to mention the other games here with proprietary multiplayer system not made by GOG like AOW3.

I'll give up the DRM-Free struggle when that day comes. I'll install Steam and forget all about GOG or Drm-free for ever. We don't need another DRM with:

-worst service (Missing Linux version for example)
-worst customer service (and in my own language)
-worst online capabilities (games without archievements or people playin on line)

The only reason to exists GOG is DRM-FREE, without it Steam is better in all ways. We've tolerated a lots of games with fewer features only because they were DRM-FREE. If the solution is to convert Galaxy in a non optional client (even if only to multiplayer), then GOG is out of the game. Steam Wins.

And now Galaxy does't go to the correct way. There is no reason to Time tracker or archievements requires online conection, but the the reality is different. The client focus on online functions that really don't need internet. And now some games require Galaxy to play online, when they can offer an online-key to use (without the client) only if the owner wants, namely a true Optional client. (Do you remember that times?, when you had the power to choose, the power to decice if you use your own online key). The clients and DRMs blew up our freedom. Now you can't play with Lan option, now you can't decide if use your key to play online, now you can't Know your play time because you aren't connect. And so I want a future more DRM-FREE and less DRM-dependent.

If GOG Follows the trail of Steam, they are lost. Without DRM-FREE GoG can do nothing against Steam. The client dependent way is a losing battle against the gigant. In other words, if I must install a mandatory client to play online, it will be Steam. There is no point of comparison, it's better in all ways (and now the off-line mode is permanet).

For now I still continue in the DRM-FREE struggle for a better future, for a future with more freedom to customers and perhaps get it back the Lan option, like Good Old Games had. Because I'm convinced that the solution is to offer more options to your customer than the competition, not offer what the compettition offers. Thus you nullify any advantage you had.

sorry to ask here but when will the preorder dlc be able to download (for pepole who preorder the game ) ?