It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
PoppyAppletree: Okay.
avatar
Shadowstalker16: Did you forget you argued games companies should market more towards women because they're a larger demographic? That doesn't sound very equal to me. Shouldn't everyone be marketed to equally if the game developers don't want to be sexist?
I believe you have misunderstood my comments. Adult women represent a very large gaming demographic. As such, if companies wish for this demographic to buy their products, they need to produce and market games which do not push away this demographic. In general, adult women have tended to be pushed away by games which pander (yes, pander) to teenage boys with pseudo-mature content in their games and adverts. Whilst these actions might increase sales amongst teenage boys (as well as some adult men), they completely turn off adult women. Adult women, incidentally, have far greater purchasing power than teenage boys, who generally do not have a meaningful income.

Claiming that everyone should be marketed to equally is not a position anyone can legitimately take, and not one I would ever associate myself with. Your concept of sexism also seems a bit lacking in depth, since it bears no relation to a situation which could ever have a place in reality.
low rated
avatar
PoppyAppletree: they completely turn off adult women.

Your concept of sexism also seems a bit lacking in depth, since it bears no relation to a situation which could ever have a place in reality.
Yeah citation needed on that one. Not that I don't trust you speak on behalf of all adult women.

Treating people the same is my concept. What more is there to equality? Its literally the definition of feminism you linked.
avatar
PoppyAppletree: Your concept of sexism also seems a bit lacking in depth, since it bears no relation to a situation which could ever have a place in reality.
avatar
Shadowstalker16: Yeah citation needed on that one. Not that I don't trust you speak on behalf of all adult women.

Treating people the same is my concept. What more is there to equality? Its literally the definition of feminism you linked.
That...lacks a great deal of nuance. Treating everyone the same is not necessarily equality. Take, for example, prisoners. Let's say you give them all clothing, soap, the same type of sleeping quarters, perhaps razors to shave with. Nobody gets treated differently, so you could claim that was equality of the sexes. Except the outcome negatively affects female prisoners' health and hygiene whilst having no effect on male prisoners, because you didn't provide menstrual products. Achieving an equal footing for all members of society isn't about being blind to differences, it's about responding to those differences in a way which regards all with equal dignity.

As for the stuff about things like T&A and over-the-top bloody violence tending to turn off adult women, that's a marketing issue, which in itself is separate from discussions about feminism (though feminism certainly bleeds into it). It's late here and I don't care to get into it just now. Some women love highly sexualised female characters or gory death scenes, but a lot of women see this stuff and understand that they're not the target demographic, and this isn't meant for them.

(Incidentally, my post never claimed to speak on behalf of all adult women. That's why I use phrases like "in general" and "tend"; it's about broad strokes, not absolutes.)
Post edited June 12, 2018 by PoppyAppletree
low rated
avatar
PoppyAppletree: Sargon can't read.
And the guy in your video is actively lying - not only the table (that breaks down sexual assault cases) he presents in his video is nowhere to be found in the study (pdf link in video description), also Benjamin never said that the study he considered more accurate was not a survey.

UPD. Oh, and when Benjamin says about "we can't say anything about unreported cases" it is because unreported cases of sexual assault are also estimates and not proben facts, not because that data is not in the study.

Though that kind misinterpritation is totally understandable. I mean, if you are openly lying by inserting your own data table in the study, making your own interpretation is no big deal.
Post edited June 12, 2018 by LootHunter
low rated
avatar
PoppyAppletree: It's about responding to those differences in a way which regards all with equal dignity.

As for the stuff about things like T&A and over-the-top bloody violence tending to turn off adult women, that's a marketing issue, which in itself is separate from discussions about feminism (though feminism certainly bleeds into it). It's late here and I don't care to get into it just now. Some women love highly sexualised female characters or gory death scenes, but a lot of women see this stuff and understand that they're not the target demographic, and this isn't meant for them.

(Incidentally, my post never claimed to speak on behalf of all adult women. That's why I use phrases like "in general" and "tend"; it's about broad strokes, not absolutes.)
And what differences beyond biological differences needs responding to? Because such equality is already guaranteed in most constitutions around the world, and manifests in most countries' laws. I think that's what a lot of people find confusing. When there is already a right to, and a right to sue against denial of gender equality in most countries, what does being a ''feminist'' mean beyond respecting and believing in those laws? Believing in frivolous claims based on raped statistics that are put on the internet by idiots looking for easy money?

Its not only adult women they turn off, it can be anyone. I fail to see how being of any sex has anything to do with taste in games. You're saying devs should market more towards a particular taste just because those tastes are allegedly held by a significant number of women? Because I don't go around demanding others accommodate my specific tastes and if they don't, call them sexist.
Haha oh god this thread is a riot.
I know a lot of fantasy games with either fixed female char or optional female in char creation; but none of them really explore feminist themes of any kind. Exception might be Mount & Blade Warband in which the female adventurer gets more often than not laughed off for doing men stuff; some lords find that either off putting, adorable or plain amusing (up to the point where you lay siege on their city with an big ass army) which could be considered a medieval feminist theme.
SaGa perhaps? It's your answer in almost every thread so I guess it could be here too.

On more serious note, as many, I am not sure what you mean by modern feminist themes but I started Tangledeep yesterday, rogue-like RPG and it has female protagonist that decides to explore dangerous wildlands to become hero and comes off as strong independent person.
It certainly is not focus of the game, though, but there is the vibe I'd say.
avatar
HereForTheBeer: I'm sure you know it's more of an action game and light on stats RPG. Though I did find that its sandbox-ish nature lets me be a good guy or a bad guy, and in some ways made it easier to play a role.
It's not much of RPG as it became defined in PC games (mostly games where one improves their stats) but I would say it is much more of role-playing game than most so-called RPGs. ONe can assume many roles. They can make own story, pick own path and craft characters to their liking. Even more so with some nmods where people can be more scummy or moral than in vanilla game. So I'd say it should certainly considered RPG.

But I don't know if it would fit what dtgreene is looking for as one has to create that feminist narrative instead themselves and I am not sure if it's what she's looking for.
Post edited June 12, 2018 by Vitek
high rated
avatar
PoppyAppletree: Didn't take long for the OP to become "low rated". Rep abuse in action.
avatar
Linko90: Yep, it has been noted as further proof of the problem.
Proof of what? I agree that the entire rep system in its current form could use work, but as far as I can tell, OP is being downvoted for obvious trolling.

If they really wanted game recommendations, they could have worded their post in a less provocative manner, and included more information on what exactly they're looking for. We have already had similar, more useful threads here on the topic of strong/interesting female protagonists etc. As it stands, I get the impression they just wanted to throw the term "modern feminist" out there, to provoke a reaction from the people who were offended by Beamdog shoehorning modern day politics into a Medieval Fantasy Classic. ( There's been another thread on that very topic recently. )
avatar
hedwards: Considering that there was some talk of them officially looking into the possibility of abusive downmodding, it was completely appropriate to make note of the fact that allowing a far left ideology to have protection not available to other groups of extremists is problematic at best.
avatar
SirPrimalform: I'm going to regret stepping in here, but seriously how is feminism in and of itself "far left"? Even radical feminism (which seems to be what you think feminism means) isn't "far left", it's nothing to do with left or right.

EDIT: Also I really need to go to bed so I won't be checking this thread again tonight. Will reply tomorrow if it hasn't been locked.
The terms left and right; far left and far right are just social constructs and propaganda terms along with the term 'moderate' also the bar is constantly moved on what they stand for as the culture changes. Always form your own opinions.

IB4 ban and downvote for not 'supporting YES QUEEN SLAY! womens rights' heaven forbid they are not constantly pandered too and something isn't soaked in female positivity even know women are just human like us males.
Post edited June 12, 2018 by David9855
avatar
Linko90: Yep, it has been noted as further proof of the problem.
avatar
CharlesGrey: Proof of what? I agree that the entire rep system in its current form could use work
Maybe that's what mod meant?

avatar
CharlesGrey: I get the impression they just wanted to throw the term "modern feminist" out there, to provoke a reaction from the people who were offended by Beamdog shoehorning modern day politics into a Medieval Fantasy Classic. ( There's been another thread on that very topic recently. )
While I wouldn't call D&D "Medieval" - as it has somewhat of a cross between Tolkied and Howard fantasy worlds, I agree that Beamdog indeed put things in "Enhanced Edition" and "Siege of Dragonspear" that didn't fit original games atmosphere and theams.

avatar
CharlesGrey: OP is being downvoted for obvious trolling.
Yes. For many men (especially white straight cis men) "modern feminism" is a synonim for manhating, bigotry and hypocrisy. And while one can argue if that perception is correct or not, OP knows perfectly well about that perception. So if she wanted to find games with something else (like simply strong female protagonists), than she would've clarified that.
avatar
tinyE: When given the choice I ALWAYS go female.
ME TOO!

About that whorehouse...

...ehm... second thought; forget it. Such works both ways ;)



My motto is: if the OP trolls - then we all trolls... or derail. I mean, we should be able to make fun of absurd things in our lives we obnoxiously are having trouble with...

OP's intelligent enough to know the difference between classic feminism and modern feminism, and how the crowd react to such.... or is she?!?
avatar
PoppyAppletree: I believe you have misunderstood my comments. Adult women represent a very large gaming demographic. As such, if companies wish for this demographic to buy their products, they need to produce and market games which do not push away this demographic. In general, adult women have tended to be pushed away by games which pander (yes, pander) to teenage boys with pseudo-mature content in their games and adverts. Whilst these actions might increase sales amongst teenage boys (as well as some adult men), they completely turn off adult women. Adult women, incidentally, have far greater purchasing power than teenage boys, who generally do not have a meaningful income.
If some demographic doesn't like some games then companies should try to make more games targeting said demographic, not alter existing games/franchise/genre to try attract a different demographic while shunning the original one. "Diversity" should means more games targeted at different peoples, not trying to artificially force diversity in all games to try to gain virtue signaling points.

I think that's the root of the problem and IMHO companies are wrong to do it that way: doing some arbitrary changes to try to pander to the demographic of the day, insult the original one if/when they complain about it calling them sexists / misogynist/ whatever'ist.(helped of course by some click bait loving members of the gaming press who love nothing more than throwing fuel on a good controversy). It's the easy and lazy way to do it but it doesn't help in the long run and only manage to make the environment more toxic for everybody...
avatar
tort1234: American gaming companies are pandering to females like never before.
avatar
PoppyAppletree: THE BIGGEST GAMING DEMOGRAPHIC IS ADULT WOMEN.

Seriously, that's not pandering, that's just marketing to your audience.

Incidentally, kickass women protagonists are a power fantasy for women in the same way as Arnie or Duke Nukem are for men. They also have the side effect of being hot as hell even without skimpy clothing because confidence is sexy, which appeals to men as well; the ur-example I'd cite is Ripley from Alien. I think it's win-win.
That's actually incorrect, according to recent polls. While 48% of the demographic are adult women, only 6% identify themselves as gamers, and three times less likely to make game related purchases as their male counterparts, (season passes, microtransactions, DLC, etc.) That said, men are pretty stupid when it comes to these things, so the answer could simply be that women are more thrifty than men, and simply wait for discounts/package deals.

But to the point of the OP: I'd say Cat Lady was pretty good, Arcanum will literally let you create a female half orc lesbian if you want, and romance same gender, etc. I'd also second Dragon Age and Bloodlines both.
avatar
Krimzon14: I bought Shadowrun Returns the other day and I think it could qualify, if you haven't played it yet.

I'm not super far into the game but all the interactions between myself and the other characters have me hooked. I like that the game let's me play as a sympathetic person towards people and their problems through the dialogue choices the game offers you. Any game that let's me make empathetic choices through dialogue is always a big plus for me, and I think a game that let's you show empathy towards people, especially marginalised/downtrodden people, counts towards showcasing feminist themes. The game is also wonderfully diverse so far (there's at least one LGBTQ character who sells you stuff) and I've enjoyed the interactions I've had with non-enemy characters. I bought the DLC earlier and I'm really itching to keep playing, haha.

The combat is also really nice, much nicer than Baldur's Gate, in my opinion. It's turn-based in the way that I wish Baldur's Gate was. It's an overhead perspective but it does so in a much more clear and useful way than Baldur's Gate does, and you can take as much time to decide what to do for each character actions. There's also no level up system in the traditional way. You just earn karma points and spend them on attribute/skill upgrades/unlocks. The character customisation at the start is a bit simple but there's a nice variety of classes and I think the attribute/skill upgrade system is fairly open-ended.

Hope this helps and that you find what you're looking for!
Yeah, I would say that both S:R and Dragonfall would be pretty "progressive" in their overall tone, especially with the different takes on metahumans, etc.
Post edited June 12, 2018 by LiquidOxygen80
avatar
HereForTheBeer: I'm sure you know it's more of an action game and light on stats RPG. Though I did find that its sandbox-ish nature lets me be a good guy or a bad guy, and in some ways made it easier to play a role.
avatar
Vitek: It's not much of RPG as it became defined in PC games (mostly games where one improves their stats) but I would say it is much more of role-playing game than most so-called RPGs. ONe can assume many roles. They can make own story, pick own path and craft characters to their liking. Even more so with some nmods where people can be more scummy or moral than in vanilla game. So I'd say it should certainly considered RPG.
That's what was rattling around in my brain as I typed it, but you managed to put it into words better than I could.

On my last playthrough (Prophecy of Pendor mod), I decided I was going to be the People's Champion, never attacking villages, chasing out bandit groups whenever I found them, etc. The game also allows the opposite, along with letting you do your own thing however you want. So yeah, I found it a decent platform to allow one to play their own role.