Not the most well versed in the subject but maybe Brent Weeks Black Prism? It's a little weird/unique, but I liked it. It's fantasy delivered almost like a science( that probably only make sense to someone that's read it). I do think he has something of a "as luck would have it" problem. I don't remember the Night Angel books being quite so much like that. I think his stuff has been the most constantly enjoyable for me over the last couple of years. [url= http://www.amazon.com/Black-Prism-Lightbringer-Brent-Weeks/dp/0316246271/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1460591146&sr= 8-1&keywords=the+black+prism]Black Prism[/url]
I would like to read more of Cherie Priest's books. I've only read "Boneshaker" which is steampunk with zombies. I did have one sizable problem with it, but I felt like the quality of the writing was quite a bit higher in respects than some of the other vapid adventuring books I've tried to get into. One of the opening scenes is an argument between family members that felt pretty realistic.
Boneshaker There were a number of books I've tried that I struggled to get into, or liked but not sure they are for everyone. Consider this general info. Mistborn seemed interesting enough as a fantasy world, but halfway through the first book I was still struggling with finding a main character believable. I don't know that I can say anything worse about it at the moment, and I kind of would like to finish it up. Some of it did seem done right, but the one thing was tough for me. It's a series, it's well reviewed, and I got all the books sold DRM-free, so that was cool.
I read about 1 and a half of the Stormlord books by Glenda Larke. I kind of like what I've read, but I'm not sure it's for everyone. I think my main issue with it is the author may have different ideas as to what constitutes cool than I do. I think she is quite a bit older than I am and that may be why. It's got that "my parents think that is so cool, but it's kinda dumb" feeling to it. BUT some of it is cool, so.... It maybe a guilty pleasure.
Just finished "Written in Red" which did a good job of getting me into it initially, although I knew a lot of the danger hype in the beginning was going to magically mellow just so there could be a story. It was fine, but it had a weird undertone to it. If pressed to guess, I would say the book is a book about outsiders, written by an outsider. It just feels like the author has some sort of disconnect with social norms or something and that bleeds into the book or maybe is the point of it. That could be a good or bad depending on the reader. Probably won't change anyone's world, but it's not a waste of time if you run out of options.
One I really didn't like was the first Emberverse book "Dies the Fire." I like the idea of it, but I've never read something that was so overly technical/authentic. Way, way, WAY too much time spent explaining everything. There are a million books in the series so somebody must be reading them, but I'm anti-recommending it.
"Stormdancer: The Lotus War Book One" I have conflict on. I think I want to like it more than I do. It's hard to say anything bad about it beyond I'm not sure what to praise about it. Maybe the sequels have that missing substance I'm wishing was there for me.