(Quoted for posterity.)

He's scared now lol.

It's almost kind of sad, really. Here's a guy who always says he's not scared of any authority, or, as he puts it "forum cops", and mocks everyone who tries to keep the peace or otherwise do something nice like hold a giveaway or prevent somebody from being scammed...and now he's quivering at even the remotest smacking of getting banned. Because he knows that, if anybody on here gets the boot, it'll be him. He's on the top of everyone's list for how much he's harassed people.

Hey Hey Hey
Last time we had Community Manager installed here the exact opposite almost happened. If Judas hadn't been on line that day it might have.

I know he has countless ban request filed against me and I would imagine there are a few of you he has reported.

Yes, but unlike Konrad, Fables actually actively wishes to hear our feedback and seems to intend to take an active role (notice how Tauto almost laughed at/mocked Konrad when he showed up and continued his act, and now suddenly stopped his normal schedule of trolling since Fable's arrived). Konrad jumped the gun, whereas Fables has stated that he/she wants to get a sense of the whole picture before passing judgement. If you look at the whole picture, it's impossible NOT to think Tauto deserves some sort of punishment, whether it be a warning, a temp ban, or a full boot. There's simply too many people, all regular or long-time forum members, who've had to deal with the constant irritation he caused, and have pages and pages of proof against him. Lord knows how much I alone have got thanks to the months upon months he's stalked and insulted me across every single thread he spots me in, even though I've already agreed not to respond to him if he'd quit bothering me (which he hasn't, of course).
Maybe you would get a warning and Tauto gets nothing if looking at the short-term (you recently had a few angry rants, Tauto's brought a full halt to his normal trolling), which Konrad did, but the long-term, which Fables stated he/she'd be doing?

Again proof that Konrad didn't know enough about the community. Although, to be fair, ciomalau has every right to post a review, and Konrad DID say that it'd be "taken into consideration" rather than "allowed" if flagged. I'm sure the staff isn't stupid enough to let the review through if it's...let's just say "normal" ciomalau content.

(Sing to Hey Hey Hey, it's Fat Albert)

E E E, it's tinyE,

And I'm gonna sing a song for you,

And E's gonna show you a thing or two,

You'll have some fun now, with E and the gang,

Learning from each other,

While E does his thing, na, na, na,

Gonna have a good time na, na, na,

Gonna have a good time E, E, E!

No he posted something correct, not really a review, a list of hints. Can be found a little bit up:
https://www.gog.com/forum/general/review_of_the_month_4d0c3/post15
But this accusation ciomalau is making and Konrad supporting him in his bias against TinyE is .......... I have no words for it!
It really sounds like hat Konrad is still holding a grudge against TinyE and the forum. p1na no comment as no info and you know me zeogold ;). Konrads wording is IMHO really bad chosen. He could have and shall have used other words with his history in mind.
Example: In case your preview is getting reported as a false positive dadada. But this IMHO snippy remark "by the forum".....really makes you wonder......(I only read recently the outcry of the proposed banning of TInyE, hence still in mind)

But maybe just bad wording onto such an UNPROVEN and false accuse!

*unplugs microphone*
To be fair, I can't imagine he got very nice comments after that little mishap. It was no doubt an honest mistake and probably not a very big deal, but he chose possibly the worst person out of everyone here to pick on, the unofficial forum mascot himself.


...what?

Konrad isn't kicking anyone anymore, that's why I don't mention his name when I tell that story. I think we can leave him alone now. My point wasn't that he did it, my point was that anyone could do it if they didn't bother to take in the whole picture before acting.

I'd better wipe this. Just pretend I made a joke about snowflakes.

TinyE, it was not about Konrad so much, but that ciomalau made this:
"UNPROVEN and false accuse".
I do not believe that you would do something like that on purpose just because and second that Konrad pre-emptive reconfirms him.
To put it onto perspective: Think of how many times we complained about certain users WITH valid proof, proof beyond certain doubt, (see my ticket number in this thread) and he makes a false assumption and gets assured by the same person who tried to ban you. Plus the wording he has chosen. As I said as well:
"But maybe just bad wording"

Well alt account garbage fuck why don't you grow some balls ?

Show your real face

The truth is large group of people THAT DO NOT LIVE ON THESE SHIT INFESTED FORUM
Think you all are garbage that should be taken out back and shot.

Suppose community manager that might get ability to ban people show up you all start sucking cock.

If there is a problem with this garbage hole maybe that has to do with the filth fucks that infest it almost 24/7?
Never posting in any sub forums.

This isn't circle jerk suck a dick land.. last I checked it was game company trying to sell games.
Yet you kids treat people that show up here like shit.

Bet that makes people want to buy games right?

But can you prove it, though? Like, y'know, other than your own biased opinion.
Besides, considering that you're part of this forum, wouldn't that technically include you?
I could very well throw the same accusation at yourself, and it'd carry about the same amount of weight.