HunchBluntley: Not sure if joking, but in case you're not:
shit is
not an acronym.
Ebany: Are you absolutely positive about that?
Am I
absolutely sure that I'm right and you're not in this? Of course not.
Reasonably sure? Absolutely. ;) Are YOU
absolutely sure your belief in whatever anecdote you heard or read has some evidence backing it up, and that you're not just assuming it was true because the source you heard it from thought it was true themselves, and it was presented in an entertaining manner?
And it certainly matters that it's not an acronym if a lot of people are circulating stories saying that it is. Critical thinking is crucial. Accurate history is important. Yes, even "just" the history of a word.
It's okay to be wrong. Ignorance is not bad;
willful ignorance is. In other words, receiving a bit of info on an irrelevant (to you) topic and taking its veracity for granted is okay; learning later that that bit of interesting trivia was untrue, but deciding that you're going to continue to "believe" the entertaining lie (and repeat it to others as truth), is not okay.
(And
LOL is a word by this point -- the digression earlier was just about how it could or "should" be pronounced. I didn't take that too seriously, but I do take seriously the dissemination of misinformation. And whenever words/language (a pet interest of mine) are being discussed, I tend to take especially keen interest.)