Posted March 14, 2018
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8da6d/8da6da54ad1e943ad3899104f3e000f77c282ae2" alt="dnovraD"
dnovraD
2023-08-14: Remember the Spaces!
Registered: Jul 2012
From United States
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0de59/0de592b47e1618c91fa62f1d121d438f2cbafc8a" alt="Sjuan"
Sjuan
New User
Registered: Dec 2016
From Argentina
Posted March 14, 2018
What a sad event :(
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8da6d/8da6da54ad1e943ad3899104f3e000f77c282ae2" alt="dnovraD"
dnovraD
2023-08-14: Remember the Spaces!
Registered: Jul 2012
From United States
Posted March 14, 2018
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/660a4/660a4cd5587c496a7b6cb853acf29ee129b97d82" alt="Dexter Grif"
Dexter Grif
Protect me, cone!
Registered: Jan 2013
From United States
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0de59/0de592b47e1618c91fa62f1d121d438f2cbafc8a" alt="Sjuan"
Sjuan
New User
Registered: Dec 2016
From Argentina
Posted March 14, 2018
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2501b/2501b5c32ec112a4e5b19d4ba268f53e6e1929a4" alt="avatar"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61752/617528f323a38b93d709e1d7b0adf637efe70399" alt="avatar"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ae4f/9ae4fe5155d07bc697912151d009b531dd80aab9" alt="kalirion"
kalirion
Future HFIL King
Registered: Apr 2009
From United States
Posted March 14, 2018
R.I.P.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93406/93406361caf70c3270ef44e86fa6e78d903de5dc" alt="Epitaph666"
Epitaph666
<3 Carma TDR
Registered: Mar 2012
From Greece
Posted March 14, 2018
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2501b/2501b5c32ec112a4e5b19d4ba268f53e6e1929a4" alt="avatar"
As for the contribution in our understanding...Well...i don't think so. His actual contributions will be left for us to judge when we are 100% sure of the existence of Black Holes.
but that's another issue and yes may he RIP.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa7be/aa7be4e70fe6c333cc16b43a1247441edc58b0e8" alt="Anothername"
Anothername
StubbornOldGamer
Registered: Sep 2008
From Germany
Posted March 14, 2018
I would call it sad that he is not with us anymore. He did lived a full life though. Fuller and longer than anticipated and even fuller and longer than most healthy men did. And contributed to the improvement of mankind on top.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89c16/89c1613cd87f48698de0df71953d80325fe5b7cb" alt="Wishbone"
Wishbone
Red herring
Registered: Oct 2008
From Denmark
Posted March 14, 2018
Rest in peace, professor Hawking. Your contributions to science were massive, and you will be missed.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fdb66/fdb66e760fa904b99cd30efe06bdeb8b16334972" alt="Ghorpm"
Ghorpm
Zielony Brzydal
Registered: Jan 2012
From Poland
Posted March 14, 2018
I usually encourage my students to avoid sentences like this. You see, the problem is that by formulating it this way it's not a physical dilemma. It's more semantics than physics.
We are 100% that objects that we commonly call "black holes" do exist. What we are unsure of is their nature. We have some strong theories, partially backed by observations but we are not certain yet. So it may happen that the nature of these objects is completely different than we think of them now. In this case we'll probably change their name to reflect our increased knowledge. So then, from semantics point of view we will say that black holes never existed. But from physical point of view we'll just have more information about them but we are already sure that objects like this exist.
So it's always safer to say: "when we are 100% sure what are black holes"
BTW: no need to capitalize it's not a proper but common noun.
We are 100% that objects that we commonly call "black holes" do exist. What we are unsure of is their nature. We have some strong theories, partially backed by observations but we are not certain yet. So it may happen that the nature of these objects is completely different than we think of them now. In this case we'll probably change their name to reflect our increased knowledge. So then, from semantics point of view we will say that black holes never existed. But from physical point of view we'll just have more information about them but we are already sure that objects like this exist.
So it's always safer to say: "when we are 100% sure what are black holes"
BTW: no need to capitalize it's not a proper but common noun.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6fed9/6fed9b5975b74c1bd7abda08fd6140886b4670db" alt="Lifthrasil"
Lifthrasil
Bring the GOG-Downloader back!
Registered: Apr 2011
From Germany
Posted March 14, 2018
Great scientist, great book-author and a person inspiring others never to give up! Farewell!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d40e9/d40e972812a269af285fc21ae99bf6a6b4ca032c" alt="MaxFulvus"
MaxFulvus
Fulvus Forever !
Registered: Apr 2012
From France
Posted March 14, 2018
To die the same day than A. Einstein birthday and the Pi Day. Strange coincidence !
RIP Mr. Hawking.
RIP Mr. Hawking.
Post edited March 14, 2018 by MaxFulvus
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9c71d/9c71d7bbbfbacf33a000689aadb40b83660f3f7b" alt="blotunga"
blotunga
GrumpyOldGamers.CyringOutMiserably
Registered: Apr 2012
From Other
Posted March 14, 2018
I'm very sad to read about this :(.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93406/93406361caf70c3270ef44e86fa6e78d903de5dc" alt="Epitaph666"
Epitaph666
<3 Carma TDR
Registered: Mar 2012
From Greece
Posted March 14, 2018
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f066/9f066556d1e3c660485da10a47c14a0b9cd36740" alt="avatar"
We are 100% that objects that we commonly call "black holes" do exist. What we are unsure of is their nature. We have some strong theories, partially backed by observations but we are not certain yet. So it may happen that the nature of these objects is completely different than we think of them now. In this case we'll probably change their name to reflect our increased knowledge. So then, from semantics point of view we will say that black holes never existed. But from physical point of view we'll just have more information about them but we are already sure that objects like this exist.
So it's always safer to say: "when we are 100% sure what are black holes"
BTW: no need to capitalize it's not a proper but common noun.
Everything else about wormholes, singularity points, Schwarzschild radii, etc is pure speculation.
Also good jokes about "not even light can escape" but then "we see Black Holes spitting out matter/beams"... To my mind is just BS. Of course i may be wrong, that's why i said we need more time to investigate and pull safer conclusions that reflect what's out there and not make some awesome sci-fi deductions that would make great Hollywood movies.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8679/b8679ee4b5c837741ae8aa3f0344a67fd97d8d53" alt="JinKazaragi"
JinKazaragi
New User
Registered: Jul 2015
From Germany
Posted March 14, 2018
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f066/9f066556d1e3c660485da10a47c14a0b9cd36740" alt="avatar"
We are 100% that objects that we commonly call "black holes" do exist. What we are unsure of is their nature. We have some strong theories, partially backed by observations but we are not certain yet. So it may happen that the nature of these objects is completely different than we think of them now. In this case we'll probably change their name to reflect our increased knowledge. So then, from semantics point of view we will say that black holes never existed. But from physical point of view we'll just have more information about them but we are already sure that objects like this exist.
So it's always safer to say: "when we are 100% sure what are black holes"
BTW: no need to capitalize it's not a proper but common noun.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5a2c/b5a2ca94b58d2fcc3800dec0ef23fd56b73a3f06" alt="avatar"
Everything else about wormholes, singularity points, Schwarzschild radii, etc is pure speculation.
Also good jokes about "not even light can escape" but then "we see Black Holes spitting out matter/beams"... To my mind is just BS. Of course i may be wrong, that's why i said we need more time to investigate and pull safer conclusions that reflect what's out there and not make some awesome sci-fi deductions that would make great Hollywood movies.