Posted January 19, 2025
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c303e/c303e35ec155638d31b82b3babf48cc8eacac9dd" alt="Shmacky-McNuts"
Shmacky-McNuts
New User
Registered: Dec 2011
From United States
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8da6d/8da6da54ad1e943ad3899104f3e000f77c282ae2" alt="dnovraD"
dnovraD
2023-08-14: Remember the Spaces!
Registered: Jul 2012
From United States
Posted January 19, 2025
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e89ff/e89ffb75ccc598fadd3110abc05fd27a9adbc1ca" alt="P. Zimerickus"
P. Zimerickus
Coffee -He/Him-
Registered: Jul 2013
From Netherlands
Posted January 19, 2025
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01ac0/01ac00df74e7ada9b2973c38fc8057118db86d7f" alt="avatar"
Oh wait.....
That is a good question sir!
I think i can only answer for myself and say in order to write a 'proper' review that can be enjoyed for others you need to at least have some education or experience aimed at the field of gathering and sharing of information
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c831/2c83176d7da1582b78dde71be2e5d691a73af748" alt="avatar"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94c91/94c91e48e093d3f6f57cc7142dc18ef4be43b986" alt="BlueMooner"
BlueMooner
Blue User
Registered: Jun 2012
From United States
Posted January 20, 2025
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/002ed/002edb947a4fa4317377c534b5f4470d27310193" alt="avatar"
If someone has a valid (!) criticism to a game, it should be no problem for that person, to express that criticism in a civilized manner.
There is never a need to resort to swear words and insults, only to express one's opinion.
If someone feels that (to get their opinion across), they must use foul language in their review (and maybe even aim some insults towards the developers and/or other players/reviewers) - the problem is not with the game or the developers or the other players/reviewers...but entirely with that ill-mannered person.
Seriously, if someone ever finds themself in the situation above (that's if they're still able to recognize that situation as wrong - which is highly unlikely, of course), one should take a step aside, take a deep breath and ask themself, whether they're still writing a legit review for a game or if they're writing down a manifesto, which is fitting some personal agenda.
We are not writing professional reviews... we are not getting paid for sharing our thoughts. Our reviews are not appearing in gaming magazines. We are gamers, sharing our thoughts and feelings on a game. Games are ultimately about having fun, an emotional experience, not a cerebral one. I hold that it's inappropriately restrictive to have the position that reviews need to be dry, clinical, methodically analytical products, purged of "uncivilized" words, rather than something that conveys the EMOTIONAL and visceral experience of the gamer.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01e0e/01e0e50cba9558087e412acf3670f6c59b5bd339" alt="avatar"
Oooh !!! SOLID idea ! I'm sad that +1 is all I can give.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c9f5/4c9f549819748e73534e2b2a7ebdf8c7688dc204" alt="TheRealBort"
TheRealBort
Bort
Registered: Oct 2020
From United Kingdom
Posted January 20, 2025
Oh wow, that's a lot of responses; thank you chaps! I hope you don't mind me bulk-replying to your messages.
So, just to clarify a few things:
Regarding swearing not belonging in reviews: I think this should be up to the reviewer really, which is why I don't think there should be censorship in reviews (more about this below). You can argue it's distasteful but I think it can be part of the tone. I've written analytic, cold-blooded, business-like reviews where I intentionally avoided using swearing or profanity. However, there are times when I like adopting a more informal and colloquial tone, and I will fancy using swearwords. Maybe not OTT like the AVGN, but if that's how the reviewer wants shape it, so be it.
Regarding my comment on censorship on reviews for children's games I'd like to add a few clarifications that may not have been obvious in my original post:
1. I was not aware that this is an 18+ site. Knowing this now, censorship makes even less sense in my eyes.
2. If it were up to me I wouldn't censor any reviews. The only reason I mentioned the family-friendly game reviews is because I don't play them myself and I can see somebody who cares enough making a case for it. But the reality is that's not my fight; I'm not going to be reviewing Ponyworld 8 any time soon.
The opt-in censorship is actually a good idea, but then again, allegedly we're all grown-ups here. If you're old enough to lie about your age to create an account then you're probably not going to learn anything you don't already know around here. ;) ;) ;)
And just to hammer the point home: I wrote a review for Cloudpunk. One of the things I wanted to highlight was the cockpit view. Once I was done my review wouldn't post and I was getting no feedback as to why this was happening. Take a guess at what the problem was... Exactly, cockpit was not allowed because I guess it contains the word cock. This and the character limit just put me off from writing reviews. I'm enjoying Highfleet at the moment a lot and I have so many good things to say about it... but I already know it's not going to fit!
Anyway, is there a way to bring this to GoG's attention or other channels to request these changes?
So, just to clarify a few things:
Regarding swearing not belonging in reviews: I think this should be up to the reviewer really, which is why I don't think there should be censorship in reviews (more about this below). You can argue it's distasteful but I think it can be part of the tone. I've written analytic, cold-blooded, business-like reviews where I intentionally avoided using swearing or profanity. However, there are times when I like adopting a more informal and colloquial tone, and I will fancy using swearwords. Maybe not OTT like the AVGN, but if that's how the reviewer wants shape it, so be it.
Regarding my comment on censorship on reviews for children's games I'd like to add a few clarifications that may not have been obvious in my original post:
1. I was not aware that this is an 18+ site. Knowing this now, censorship makes even less sense in my eyes.
2. If it were up to me I wouldn't censor any reviews. The only reason I mentioned the family-friendly game reviews is because I don't play them myself and I can see somebody who cares enough making a case for it. But the reality is that's not my fight; I'm not going to be reviewing Ponyworld 8 any time soon.
The opt-in censorship is actually a good idea, but then again, allegedly we're all grown-ups here. If you're old enough to lie about your age to create an account then you're probably not going to learn anything you don't already know around here. ;) ;) ;)
And just to hammer the point home: I wrote a review for Cloudpunk. One of the things I wanted to highlight was the cockpit view. Once I was done my review wouldn't post and I was getting no feedback as to why this was happening. Take a guess at what the problem was... Exactly, cockpit was not allowed because I guess it contains the word cock. This and the character limit just put me off from writing reviews. I'm enjoying Highfleet at the moment a lot and I have so many good things to say about it... but I already know it's not going to fit!
Anyway, is there a way to bring this to GoG's attention or other channels to request these changes?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c16c8/c16c8a6e49adbad34edb24a44d48f03f6b42abdf" alt="paladin181"
paladin181
Cheese
Registered: Nov 2012
From United States
Posted January 20, 2025
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/edfdc/edfdcc56f2272cfd5c41c089547364191169e4f6" alt="avatar"
The biggest problem of the GOG user reviews is the very bad reputation. Several developers have told me and others to write a review on Steam instead. On Steam developers can flag reviews so that they can be moderated and it helps them to make the game visible on the storefront. On GOG even people who haven't bought the game can post their drivel. Then either nothing happens with the shitposting reviews or it will take a long time until the garbage collection starts. IMHO, the entire user review system needs to be replaced with something else. As an alternative GOG should do it like the EGS and have no user reviews at all. Even this would be better than the current user review system.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12b39/12b39146492c0e93737dc67fe6aaa09cc3e29c15" alt="Catventurer"
Catventurer
Savior of Cats
Registered: Mar 2021
From United States
Posted January 20, 2025
I'm going to say no to this one. Swearing about a product doesn't really tell me anything.
If you say, "This game is ass." (for example) What does that mean exactly?
For all I know, the issue is entirely that the trousers that the player character wears really accentuates his buttcheeks in a way that is really distracting from the task of slaughtering enemies. You really wish that he wore a longer shirt or maybe just different trousers that were not nearly so tight around the ass because looking at that ass is making you uncomfortable.
Or maybe you're just angry because you can't get the game to work with your specific gamepad. The keyboard controls are totally fine and very nice actually. People that have some other gamepad will also run into no issues. It's entirely the gamepad that you invested money into that is the issue because the developers never tested the game on it and therefore don't know it doesn't work with the game. You're calling the game ass because you are just that butthurt about it.
Or maybe there's a VRAM memory leak in the game, but it only affects the specific really expensive video card in your expensive computer. Can't test them all. You're really angry about it because you spent all that money on your hardware only to end up with a worse framerate than us laptop users with integrated graphics.
If you say, "This game is ass." (for example) What does that mean exactly?
For all I know, the issue is entirely that the trousers that the player character wears really accentuates his buttcheeks in a way that is really distracting from the task of slaughtering enemies. You really wish that he wore a longer shirt or maybe just different trousers that were not nearly so tight around the ass because looking at that ass is making you uncomfortable.
Or maybe you're just angry because you can't get the game to work with your specific gamepad. The keyboard controls are totally fine and very nice actually. People that have some other gamepad will also run into no issues. It's entirely the gamepad that you invested money into that is the issue because the developers never tested the game on it and therefore don't know it doesn't work with the game. You're calling the game ass because you are just that butthurt about it.
Or maybe there's a VRAM memory leak in the game, but it only affects the specific really expensive video card in your expensive computer. Can't test them all. You're really angry about it because you spent all that money on your hardware only to end up with a worse framerate than us laptop users with integrated graphics.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7b5e/f7b5e9096b4883b0fa2f13b74211847eb2c2e33a" alt="Vainamoinen"
Vainamoinen
🇺🇦 🇺🇦 🇺🇦 🇺🇦
Registered: May 2010
From Germany
Posted January 20, 2025
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/002ed/002edb947a4fa4317377c534b5f4470d27310193" alt="avatar"
If someone has a valid (!) criticism to a game, it should be no problem for that person, to express that criticism in a civilized manner.
There is never a need to resort to swear words and insults, only to express one's opinion.
Nonetheless, "civilized discourse" is literally the politicized justification for far reaching censorship in the USA, and from there, e. g. through google and meta, in the rest of the world. It's one of the key methods of tone policing, that means, minorities and the minoritized are not allowed to express their justified anger in an actually visible/disruptive manner. Their hopes, rights and their dignity is taken away in an orderly and 'civilized' manner (a process that should raise our German neck hairs profoundly). Are they to plead for their lives only with the words their masters' God allows?
Yes, "it's only video game reviews", I see that very clearly.
Also, it's only video game reviews on GOG, a teensy site that anchors somewhere between the toes of Valve Corporation, where it holds on for dear life.
And besides, a review filled to the brim with swear words is not likely to be particularly informative.
On the other hand, we're discussing the issue of political review bombing by fake reviewers in a thousand places on this forum. GOG clearly can only remain a viable business partner to game developers if they curb the tide of fake reviews in its entirety. Now I see the very same people who call this utter necessity "censorship" (and even invoke the dystopian nightmare of socialist George Orwell's "1984") clamoring for clear cut censorship of swear words to retain standards of "civil discourse".
But reviews have no standards of discourse whatsoever as long as lying political commenters get to review a game as if they had actually experienced it.
In any review, honesty should be the first consideration, and tone maybe a distant fourth. There's absolutely nothing wrong with a bit of foul language among friends – and the gaming community was pretty much "among friends" a dozen years ago – but if your friends pass the opinion of some clickbait youtuber as their own just to get you to hate and boycott a video game they've never played, absolutely everything is wrong with that.
Post edited January 20, 2025 by Vainamoinen
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af325/af325fce07067bda5ed0f85de23e6195c2aa6279" alt="FarkyTheDog"
FarkyTheDog
werefull
Registered: Dec 2024
From Chile
Posted January 20, 2025
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01e0e/01e0e50cba9558087e412acf3670f6c59b5bd339" alt="avatar"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb954/fb9549c19f172c59d2070b1b6a609c7bcd56460e" alt="avatar"
Fucking eh, that is so much right!
Bingo!
Post edited January 20, 2025 by FarkyTheDog
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8da6d/8da6da54ad1e943ad3899104f3e000f77c282ae2" alt="dnovraD"
dnovraD
2023-08-14: Remember the Spaces!
Registered: Jul 2012
From United States
Posted January 20, 2025
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66610/66610730d28e89eba8462eaba12cced1f4ac2385" alt="avatar"
We are not writing professional reviews... we are not getting paid for sharing our thoughts. Our reviews are not appearing in gaming magazines. We are gamers, sharing our thoughts and feelings on a game. Games are ultimately about having fun, an emotional experience, not a cerebral one. I hold that it's inappropriately restrictive to have the position that reviews need to be dry, clinical, methodically analytical products, purged of "uncivilized" words, rather than something that conveys the EMOTIONAL and visceral experience of the gamer.
As I said above, we are not professional reviewers, nor should we be expected to behave as such. Not everyone has a great or even good vocabulary. Not everyone speaks English as a first language. People aren't all adults even. While striving to better oneself is always admirable, I don't support any kind of mandation towards that end. It's completely unfair to tell a teen that they should display the same standards as fifty year old, decades-long, nationally recognized professional reviewers. Most gamers are never going to be sesquipedalians (most people for that matter).
People can review in their native tongue, it should be reminded. It seems GOG and users oft forget this.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2368/e236871f77493d51846182d10eb09b31bda539c8" alt="BreOl72"
BreOl72
GOG is spiralling down
Registered: Sep 2010
From Germany
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8162d/8162d5b0356ee1a66c3e26c9e0fbe3c14b53e865" alt="Breja"
Breja
You're in my spot
Registered: Apr 2012
From Poland
Posted January 20, 2025
Hey guys, I'll simplify this for you.
Should you be able to express your opinion about a game without having to resort to swearing? Yes.
Is it kind of ridiculous that even in a review of games that are literally porn you can't say "f***"? Also yes.
Should you be able to express your opinion about a game without having to resort to swearing? Yes.
Is it kind of ridiculous that even in a review of games that are literally porn you can't say "f***"? Also yes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d597/9d597917637b60534b550c6615e68d4856e2ceb4" alt="SultanOfSuave"
SultanOfSuave
A user
Registered: May 2014
From United Kingdom
Posted January 21, 2025
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7b5e/f7b5e9096b4883b0fa2f13b74211847eb2c2e33a" alt="Vainamoinen"
Vainamoinen
🇺🇦 🇺🇦 🇺🇦 🇺🇦
Registered: May 2010
From Germany
Posted January 22, 2025
Yeah, I get it and I can relate. I myself can't take this kind of stance since I've got fairly rapidly expanding family in the USA. Still, the call for the abolishment of swear words is a quintessentially American one (they'd all die of a heart attack if they had to watch British TV in the evenings ... I mean Morgana even got bonus points calling Alex "little fucker" ... inside joke, sorry). Even my liberal as fuck cousins lower their voice and mutter under their breath when they say "shit". It's their upbringing, they can't help it.
Maybe the protest against what's going on in the States right now must reject those exact Christian/Republican demands to civil discourse, with a vengeance. Thanks to these standards, this is one of the key forms of free speech we do not have, that is censored online (not talking about insults, just swear words).
Maybe the protest against what's going on in the States right now must reject those exact Christian/Republican demands to civil discourse, with a vengeance. Thanks to these standards, this is one of the key forms of free speech we do not have, that is censored online (not talking about insults, just swear words).
Post edited January 22, 2025 by Vainamoinen
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b81ea/b81ea443849547315d8db85bca6ed32387484320" alt="Timboli"
Timboli
Sharpest Tool On Shelf
Registered: May 2017
From Australia
Posted January 23, 2025
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c61db/c61dbd8e05815c7bb846d16ce403dab97539a4da" alt="avatar"
1. Character limit:
2. Profanity censorship:
I don't know if this has been brought up and considered by the GoG team before, but hopefully my requests make sense.
Swearing, which is something I do regularly, but only in a meaningful way and in proper context, is easy enough to go without, at least for me. We all have to avoid it in certain situations anyway.