It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Grim Fandango resurrected.

Grim Fandango Remastered marks the return of gaming's most recognisable, and notoriously unavailable, cult classic - now on Windows, Mac, and Linux. This upcoming release got everybody so excited, Tim Schafer even prepared a special trailer all about how you can pre-order Grim Fandango Remastered (and why that’s a fine idea) right now, exclusively on GOG.com for the first week!

Grim Fandango is by far the single most wishlisted game by the GOG.com community with an overwhelming 45,000 votes. It's a unique blend of Mexican folklore with film noir stylings, and has been critically praised for its art direction, writing, and memorable characters.

Grim Fandango Remastered refreshes, refines, and remasters the award winning title and Tim Schafer's last hurrah as LucasArts' adventure-gaming-extraordinaire. The remaster modernizes the game's presentation and gameplay with completely repainted textures, widescreen support, and quite possibly best of all: modern controls. You can now say goodbye to unwieldy tank controls, a staple of the early 3D era, and enjoy a fully point-and-click interface - but only if you want! The option to play the game as originally envisioned is always there.


Have you missed Grim Fandango the first time around? Now's your chance to experience gaming history like never before, or if you have played it in its heyday - you're probably long overdue for another go anyway. You can pre-order Grim Fandango Remastered right now on GOG.com!
The pre-order will last until Tuesday, January 27, when the game is expected to launch on GOG.com.


It took a lot to bring this classic back to life. If you’d like to learn more about the remaster, Double Fine and 2 Player Productions have just released the newest episode of The Making of Grim Fandango Remastered - a recommended watch.

<iframe width="773" height="435"src="//www.youtube.com/embed/swrIN5yIaOk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Post edited January 13, 2015 by Konrad
avatar
TheOperaGhost: Not true.

I've got the game, and I play it. It's as enjoyable as ever.
avatar
Novotnus: That's right. Due to the game's unique art direction it still looks pretty nice with low-poly models and pre-rendered backgrounds.
New version is still worth it for me for the commentary, but the old version aged very nicely.
+1
high rated
avatar
darthspudius: What are you on? I didn't reply because I didn't care, to be blunt.

Son, I am an audiophile. I like the best quality audio. It's an annoying little obsession musicians and music lovers tend to have. It is my opinion and five very short songs does not do much to sway my opinion. I grew up with the game and enjoyed it greatly. My opinion is my own and I have no shame in stating it whenever I want to.

Edit: Game CD quality is not the same as a standard CD album. A remaster would do any justice to the audio what so ever. Especially if the development videos were correct when they said they did not have access to the original files. I could be wrong about that part but the fact that it was good quality back then does not mean it is good quality now. It is not like we're listening to it on a time less vinyl record or something.
My point was that you never ended up backing up your ridiculous claims because you couldn't.

I'm something of an audiophile too being a musician and occasional sound engineer. As I said, your opinion about the music is something you're welcome to but it doesn't change the fact that you are completely and utterly wrong about the original music not being played by humans.

And yes, I know 'game CD quality' is not the same as CD quality. I already addressed that in the post you're replying to when I said "included in the game at less than CD-quality". My point is that the recordings were high quality. They were then reduced in quality for inclusion in the game. The soundtrack CDs for the game have the tracks in full quality. And I didn't suggest they remaster the audio, you misread my post again.

I said that the original audio (at the CD quality they couldn't fit in the original game) could have been included in the remaster. When I say the remaster I mean the edition of the game we're talking about. See, I only used the word once in that post and I was clearly talking about the remaster of the game.

I think you seem to have fundamental misunderstanding about what 'recording quality' means. You're confusing the fact that the music was stored in the game in a low quality format with a poor quality recording.
low rated
avatar
darthspudius: What are you on? I didn't reply because I didn't care, to be blunt.

Son, I am an audiophile. I like the best quality audio. It's an annoying little obsession musicians and music lovers tend to have. It is my opinion and five very short songs does not do much to sway my opinion. I grew up with the game and enjoyed it greatly. My opinion is my own and I have no shame in stating it whenever I want to.

Edit: Game CD quality is not the same as a standard CD album. A remaster would do any justice to the audio what so ever. Especially if the development videos were correct when they said they did not have access to the original files. I could be wrong about that part but the fact that it was good quality back then does not mean it is good quality now. It is not like we're listening to it on a time less vinyl record or something.
avatar
SirPrimalform: snip
uh huh, if you say so. Yes dear. mmmhmmm. Ok... sausages are fine. Yes honey.
avatar
darthspudius: uh huh, if you say so. Yes dear. mmmhmmm. Ok... sausages are fine. Yes honey.
I give up. You dun trolled me good.

Now please tell me you didn't actually believe any of the crap you've been spouting?
I honestly think they are trying to do something positive for the gamers and their own pockets at the same time. Sure is a lot of whining raining down here.
They could have easily left it to die on Ebay regardless the votes it received. So it is remastered, I don't really care although I do have the original which runs well on ResidualVM. Na, na, na, na. :P
Soooo why should I pre-order, exactly? What incentive am I being given?
I will probably buy the game at some point after it comes out and some reviews are in, but what is the carrot on the stick in the case of pre-ordering?
avatar
FowderSoap: Soooo why should I pre-order, exactly? What incentive am I being given?
I will probably buy the game at some point after it comes out and some reviews are in, but what is the carrot on the stick in the case of pre-ordering?
if you pre order if you will be standing up and supporting drm free stance , gog has gotten exclusive chance to offer the game for pre order before the game launches on any other platform.

I wish gog had not messed up this awesome thing without merging the votes.

between regarding the heavy minimum requirements i did ask about it on the double fine forums and got the reply that they will be optimizing the game to run on lower configs than that specified
Post edited January 16, 2015 by liquidsnakehpks
Pre-ordered, thanks GOG!

I played this game 6 times already and can't wait to play the remastered version with new recorded audio and no technical problems running it, I already had the original game CD version.

I tried getting my wife to play it since it's such a classic but I couldn't run it properly on Windows XP or Windows 7. Something to do with newer Nvidia cards and drivers (you can't go back too much on the drivers because it won't support the card anymore at some point). I tried disabling DirectX acceleration, running it windowed, etc. The only thing that worked somewhat reliably but it was a complete pain, was to run it in VMware, yes, you read that right, I had to run the game inside a Windows, inside a VMware running on top of the host WIndows to get this running. But even then there were sound issues and issues with the CPU being too fast (yes, I know about CPUKiller). It was a complete PIA to get this running reliably in a modern OS/hardware configuration so I just stopped trying.

This is why, the remastered edition (assuming it works perfectly on new systems) is more than welcome, thanks again!
avatar
damien: I would like to remind that all those votes GOG is referring to is for the original version, not remastered.
You can't know that. I voted before the merge because there was no "remastered" edition announced at the time and I'd vote for the remastered edition if there was a separate entry. We can assume there are more people like me so you cannot know that all of those votes were _strictly_ for the original version. This remastered edition doesn't change almost anything about the gameplay, you get additional control options, support for the newer hardware/software, updated lighting on the engine, re-recorded music and recompressed cinematics. But all the character models, pre-rendered scenes, dialogue lines, quest lines, environment model, etc is absolutely identical. So much so that most people on Youtube you'll see are complaining about that and many of them wanted a full remake on a different engine with different mechanics.
Post edited January 16, 2015 by rmihaif
avatar
Niggles: As others have pointed out, the wishlist votes is for the ORIGINAL game.Not remastered version. This applies to other games on the list as well. No offence .
I think trying to make this distinction is silly. When someone wishes a game on GOG they wish to get that game and supported for modern platforms. When the "ORIGINAL" game (as you like to emphasize) doesn't even work well on modern hardware/software then it's IMPOSSIBLE to get that version, or if GOG were to actually provide it it would be fraud, an insult to their customers. So it's _very common_ that most things wishlisted on GOG (especially if they are very old and have technical problems running on modern systems) are modified somewhat before they are released by GOG. In this case, we're getting a professional update for it, not just some engine fixes and the update really doesn't change that much at all.

I mean, what, you don't like the additional shadows and want to drop those? You don't like the re-compressed movies and want pixalated movies? You don't like higher resolution textures and want the lower resolution one? The additional control options are just that, options.

The only issue that I could imagine where people may want the original is the re-recorded music. But really, just wait and see how it is, in all likelihood it's just a much better sounding (better sampling rate used) version of the same music. There is no reason to expect that the music is significantly different other than a quality update. So then, what really is the problem?
A strange question I'm sure, but can we play it using the 360 controllers in Grim Fandango Remastered? It's not a deal breaker if it doesn't. From what I can tell, the original supported joysticks and controllers.
low rated
avatar
drealmer7: No, you don't, actually. First of all, ALL I want is the original in its original form. That is not here, at all. You can switch to old textures and interface, but that doesn't make it the same as the old game. Some people settle for less and are convinced it is more, I am not one of those people and will never buy this copy. Wholly disappointing. You took the mona lisa and gave her a new frame and a veneer finish. That is DESTROYING art, not PRESERVING art.
Then get whichever version you wish from where you can find it.

It is unrealistic to expect the GOG game wishlist to support this usecase. The wishlist isn't a wishlist of "specific golden images" of a game. It's a wishlist of games. Most games have a number of releases, they appear released by some publisher on a number of CDs and then a few years later, they make it a DVD release automatically patched under another publisher and then when it gets to a digital store they make yet another release. As a matter of fact, many games have different versions between different digital stores (I know, I have games at Amazon, GOG and Steam and can compare). So what now, should every wishlisted game specify the exact build/golden image that you wish for GOG to bring?

That's absurd. By bringing a game to GOG, they are actually making one more version of it, for EVERY game they bring, simply by integrating their installer into it. But in many cases they need to do more than just the installer part, like technical fixes for the game. Those fixes are unique and if the game is brought to other stores or re-released on discs you will get yet another version and so on.

And about "destroying art", hyperbole much? Destroying (in case it's unclear to you), means going about and destroying the media of that art. GOG isn't going to buy all Grim Fandango CDs from ebay and Amazon and bulldoze them, that is destroying. What they are doing is bringing a DRM free, Linux/OSX/Windows updated version of a gaming masterpiece, ie they add to the art, they are creating something even if it's something you do not desire.
Post edited January 16, 2015 by rmihaif
avatar
drealmer7: No, you don't, actually. First of all, ALL I want is the original in its original form. That is not here, at all. You can switch to old textures and interface, but that doesn't make it the same as the old game. Some people settle for less and are convinced it is more, I am not one of those people and will never buy this copy. Wholly disappointing. You took the mona lisa and gave her a new frame and a veneer finish. That is DESTROYING art, not PRESERVING art.
avatar
rmihaif: Then get whichever version you wish from where you can find it.

It is unrealistic to expect the GOG game wishlist to support this usecase. The wishlist isn't a wishlist of "specific golden images" of a game. It's a wishlist of games. Most games have a number of releases, they appear released by some publisher on a number of CDs and then a few years later, they make it a DVD release automatically patched under another publisher and then when it gets to a digital store they make yet another release. As a matter of fact, many games have different versions between different digital stores (I know, I have games at Amazon, GOG and Steam and can compare). So what now, should every wishlisted game specify the exact build/golden image that you wish for GOG to bring?

That's absurd. By bringing a game to GOG, they are actually making one more version of it, for EVERY game they bring, simply by integrating their installer into it. But in many cases they need to do more than just the installer part, like technical fixes for the game. Those fixes are unique and if the game is brought to other stores or re-released on discs you will get yet another version and so on.
what i don't understand is what is your problem in him demanding the original here , all they are asking is that the grim fandango original game wishlist be left alone with the proper amount of votes it had instead of force merging it into the remastered list. Its not hard to do.
when monkey island special edition came out gog did not pull such a stunt
the original game request
http://www.gog.com/wishlist/games/the_secret_of_monkey_island_1
special edition
http://www.gog.com/wishlist/games/the_secret_of_monkey_island_special_edition_1

as you can see the difference , this is what gog should have done instead of force merge
Post edited January 16, 2015 by liquidsnakehpks
low rated
avatar
liquidsnakehpks: what i don't understand is what is your problem in him demanding the original here , all they are asking is that the grim fandango original game wishlist be left alone with the proper amount of votes it had instead of force merging it into the remastered list. Its not hard to do.
Depends on what you define as "original". No game that was ever brought to GOG was the original, it was at least modified to integrate the installer and usually further modified to make it work on modern hardware. Plus, like I explained, most games have many "originals", there are more than one original. So it's not practical and realistic to expect the GOG wishlist to somehow be so specific.

As to bringing the _original_ game (that is, the exact same executable that is installed after installing from the CDs), that could only work if it's provided as a bonus to this remastered edition because if they offer it as a separate product then they are liable for fraud as the original game doesn't work on most modern gaming setups. Other than that, I'm not against it, GOG could add it as a bonus package.

when monkey island special edition came out gog did not pull such a stunt
the original game request
http://www.gog.com/wishlist/games/the_secret_of_monkey_island_1
special edition
http://www.gog.com/wishlist/games/the_secret_of_monkey_island_special_edition_1

as you can see the difference , this is what gog should have done instead of force merge
I can see why they did this. This remastered version is almost identical to the original version, there are much fewer changes than the Monkey Island remakes. Those are very different games (as in, different engine, different graphics, different models), the only thing they have in common are the same puzzles/quests, characters and dialogues.

So just as GOG doesn't split off the wishlist when they bring a wishlisted game after having modified it to fix the technical problems with, similarly they decided that the remastered edition doesn't contain enough changes to split it off.

Do this test, take any random sample of people and post a movie with you doing something in original GF and then doing the same thing in the remastered version, I'm arguing that most people can't tell which is which. That's how similar these 2 are (just check the youtube gameplay videos) while in the case of Monkey Island HD editions anyone can tell you those are different games.
Post edited January 16, 2015 by rmihaif
avatar
liquidsnakehpks: what i don't understand is what is your problem in him demanding the original here , all they are asking is that the grim fandango original game wishlist be left alone with the proper amount of votes it had instead of force merging it into the remastered list. Its not hard to do.
avatar
rmihaif: Depends on what you define as "original". No game that was ever brought to GOG was the original, it was at least modified to integrate the installer and usually further modified to make it work on modern hardware. Plus, like I explained, most games have many "originals", there are more than one original. So it's not practical and realistic to expect the GOG wishlist to somehow be so specific.

As to bringing the _original_ game (that is, the exact same executable that is installed after installing from the CDs), that could only work if it's provided as a bonus to this remastered edition because if they offer it as a separate product then they are liable for fraud as the original game doesn't work on most modern gaming setups. Other than that, I'm not against it, GOG could add it as a bonus package.

when monkey island special edition came out gog did not pull such a stunt
the original game request
http://www.gog.com/wishlist/games/the_secret_of_monkey_island_1
special edition
http://www.gog.com/wishlist/games/the_secret_of_monkey_island_special_edition_1

as you can see the difference , this is what gog should have done instead of force merge
avatar
rmihaif: I can see why they did this. This remastered version is almost identical to the original version, there are much fewer changes than the Monkey Island remakes. Those are very different games (as in, different engine, different graphics, different models), the only thing they have in common are the same puzzles/quests, characters and dialogues.

So just as GOG doesn't split off the wishlist when they bring a wishlisted game after having modified it to fix the technical problems with, similarly they decided that the remastered edition doesn't contain enough changes to split it off.

Do this test, take any random sample of people and post a movie with you doing something in original GF and then doing the same thing in the remastered version, I'm arguing that most people can't tell which is which. That's how similar these 2 are (just check the youtube gameplay videos) while in the case of Monkey Island HD editions anyone can tell you those are different games.
So what you are saying is this is not a upgrade over the original release and they are scamming here everyone by calling it a remastered edition ?
If you have the official double fine confirmed final game release screenshots and gameplay changes to prove there is no major changes between the original game and the remaster do post them otherwise both the original game and the remaster are different release and both have a right to exist in the wishlist.

If you cant make out the difference between a orignal and a remaster that's fine but don't force it on everyone else.
avatar
liquidsnakehpks: If you cant make out the difference between a orignal and a remaster that's fine but don't force it on everyone else.
You seem to be accusing me of something here which I do not think it's true. I know what the differences are, I've listed them plenty above in my earlier replies. I just don't consider those differences to be in the same league as the Monkey Island remakes that you compared them to, and I think that most people would agree with me on that by doing a simple test with clips from playing the original/updated versions and compare them. Because the differences to the original game are so small I do not consider that GOG has abused anything by "merging the threads".

If Morrowind GOTY comes to GOG I'd similarly expect them to merge the "Morrowind" and the "Morrowind GOTY" option. But go ahead and create a "Morrowind Classic Original Version" entry then if you wish so.