Posted August 03, 2017
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dbdd8/dbdd8284fa272d276f45296b876e1318327d7c49" alt="avatar"
So tell me, do you really think Laissez Faire makes sense in a world where corruption is rampant and people have little to no self-restraint?
And yes, I do think that suppressing free will for the "common good" is bad.
Earlier I mentioned throwing fat gamer nerds in prisons if they can't do at least 15 pull ups. We can expand that if you like. Add those who can't solve Einstein's Puzzle. Add those who only speak one language. Add those who eat at McDonalds. Those who read Harry Potter. Those who watch Pawn Stars. Those who listen to pop music.
Clearly we know better, and clearly all these things are utter rubbish, therefore it is self evident that such people must either be brought into the fold or punished, and their activities outlawed. Right?
Again, I'm not telling you to preorder. Same as I'm not telling you to eat fast food. Nor would I do either of those things myself. But removing an option from others because of your self-righteous elitism is wrong.
And don't get me wrong, I am an elitist myself. I sometimes look down on people based on a number of the things I listed above. But never would I ever consider preventing those people from being who they are and doing what they want. Choices, good and bad, need to be present always. Without choices, that self-restraint you keep talking about is meaningless.
Post edited August 03, 2017 by Alaric.us