Posted June 14, 2016
RWarehall: You do know that some of those steps are probably good ones...
Especially the specific DirectX packages they are asking you to install.
Do you know why? Because those are the packages they use on their test machines and they seemed to work for them.
It is not stupid they ask this. You are stupid for disregarding it completely and just complaining you aren't getting a refund for no work. Quite a few games need specific drivers to work correctly and the "latest" packages sometimes are not as backward compatible as they claim.
If it were known that the game tends to have issues with certain DirectX packages (or certain other things on the list), then I'd be quite a bit more willing to try those things. As it stands, though, the game seems to have crashing issues for quite a few people, and the source of the issue has proved rather elusive, for both the user-base and the developers. So once again, the various suggestions that were listed remain highly generic, and when taken in the context of random crashes that have proved elusive for even the devs, are likely to just prove a waste of my time (as well as having the potential to cause problems with some of the many other games I have installed that are all currently working flawlessly). I don't particularly mind troubleshooting if there's a good lead on what the problem may be and it's just a few quick things to try; it's the shotgun approach (like the laundry list I was asked to run through) that I take issue with, as in my experience that tends to do nothing more than waste my time (and the extent of the list shows quite a disregard for the value of my time). Especially the specific DirectX packages they are asking you to install.
Do you know why? Because those are the packages they use on their test machines and they seemed to work for them.
It is not stupid they ask this. You are stupid for disregarding it completely and just complaining you aren't getting a refund for no work. Quite a few games need specific drivers to work correctly and the "latest" packages sometimes are not as backward compatible as they claim.
I also find it rather amusing that it's now a couple of people who have brought up the criticism of "refund for no work"; when has it become a requirement to put in some given amount of work to get a refund if something bought proves unfit for purpose? I can buy a $200 item at the local home improvement store, and if for some reason it doesn't suit my needs return it the next day for a full refund, no questions asked. Yet for a $20 game I'm asked to run through a large list of steps before a refund is even considered. The discrepancy makes things seem a bit... petty.