Klumpen0815: Not exactly. Archive.org is legally regarded as a museum. The big question is, if they should cease to offer downloads though.
mindblast: Of course not. Let's get something straight. A project like that does not encourage piracy. We're talking about free of licence or abandonware materials. Those materials should be centralized somewhere, exactly for what they are stating in their Terms, "scholarship and research purposes only". Let's say that i want an manual for my 70 years old radio. I'm not gonna find that one at manufacturer, as it does not exist anymore. Only place where i could find it would be in some archives, but it's harder for me to physically look for them. Well, on Internet Archive, another guy from other part of the globe can scan his 70 years old radio manual that i'm looking for and i couldn't be more happy to take it from there.
We're talking about a lot of information that does not exist in general sources, that some people might need. Same with games. Maybe i'm an developer, but i want my game to inspire something from Volfield. In order to do my research, i would need the game. Well, that's a game that you can't buy right now. So, having it in an archive somewhere it's more than welcomed.
I completely agree for titles that are not sold anymore, that's why I always liked Abandonia's approach of replacing links to their files with links to GoG's game cards when the game was sold again. Before the site got so messed up, it was like a museum to me. They had their own rules and those were not arbitrary. When someone complained about some license, they stopped offering the files.
Archive.org offers games that are licensed and sold again though and that's where the opinions clash.
I think, that GoG's versions are superior for easy gaming purposes thanks to the neat repackaging in easily working containers for various modern systems and worth the money in many cases (although often a bit less money, since they didn't create DosBox, ScummVm or Wine), so offering the old original files in an online museum would be grand, what I don't like is that they seem to include emulators as well while that's just making historical material "unclean" to me, if you only see it from the scientifical perspective.
Let's just hope, that the copyright laws regarding source code and running time of licences for software are updated at some point. The first generation of devs is already dying, so it's time to properly handle their legacy in an orderly and fair fashion which we won't get from license trolls (close relatives of the patent trolls) which may already be valued employees in video game companies if you look at the hassle GoG has with some licences.