Zerek.146: Ok, as a Skellige deck, I find Monsters way too overpowered. If I don't have clear sky at round one, I instanly forfeit. That is clearly impossible to beat Monsters deck that can throw any weather + immune to all of them + spawning lots of minons just by playing weather. How many removals can I have, 3-4? Even that is not enough, they can spam weather and minions every round and you can't do anything about that. You don't have clear sky/gold cards? Bad for you, monsters always win. Moreover, most of the games are against Mosnters. Add Caranthir/Leshen/Dagon = gg.

EDIT: Caranthir is way to OP. Frost, immune to Frost, screw your close combat minions, spam own minions, immune to frost.

sosica: I'm still getting the "Game inconsistency..." thingy that instantly ends the match and makes me lose if I'm viewing my graveyard while one (or more) of my units are getting destroyed (and thus appear in the graveyard with the wrong strenght).

sosica: Fellow Skellige player here, and I do not agree with you. The Skellige faction has sufficiently enough units that are weather-immune and, if you time it well, a Dimeritium Bomb is all you need to make Monster deck players mad (i.e. you see them not sending their GG at the end). The only commonly used Skellige deck that may be inferior due to not using these immune units would be a Savage Bear/War Longship based deck - but there you have Cripple's effect counter any monster spams.

MadTubeSock: NEED PRIVATE MATCHES! Or this game is little else than an embellished Gwent from Witcher 3.

Rainse: ???? You can play with friends. Or AI. So what private match?????

MadTubeSock: You're right. My bad. Thanks for catching me. Happy Gwent!

GICaesar: Also, when a player "looses connection" do you think it just that the game authomaticaly considers him a looser? It is not his fault... Would it not be better to annulate the results of such a game?

JMich: No. It won't be better.
Consider this scenario, I'm playing against someone, and I am about to lose the game. Thus I disconnect my internet, and the game doesn't count.
The usual scenario is to give some time for the player to come back, though not sure how feasible that is in GWENT, considering the turn time limit is quite small.

GICaesar: I don't like some of the changes.

The first thing that comes to mind is degrading Eredin from gold to silver... Why? Zoltan Chivay or Shani for example are gold, and the king of the wild hunt does not deserve it???

Also, as I play this a lot since I absolutely LOVE gwent, I see, or rather it seems to me, that when finishing a rouind in the monster deck it happens perhaps too often that - on the opponent side mostly - it is the strongest monster card that remains on the field... It happens so often to me that I doubt it to be an accident... And - when Eredin has been degraded to mere silver - why does that card never remain...

Connection loss... The game tries to persuade me sometimes that I've lost the connection... What connection - the internet connection? Nothing wrong with it, I have a very stabile 500/20 Mbps oprical line... Also, when a player "looses connection" do you think it just that the game authomaticaly considers him a looser? It is not his fault... Would it not be better to annulate the results of such a game?

You should definitively reconsider the description on some of the cards... Like the Pavetta, where it is inaccurate, incomplete, and misleading even. It says that this card destroys the weakest cards twice in a row. It does, but someone forgot to mention that it does so not only on the opponent's side, but on the player's side too and destroys even itself in the process when it is the weakest card on the player's side. I spent 800 scraps to forge it, since as I understood the description, I thought it would affect only the opponent's side. If I knew how it works in real, I would never forge it, it is absolutely meaningless as it works now...

The Scoiatel deck... While in the witcher game it was one of the better decks and very strong, here in the gwent game it became probably the weakest. It has probably but 2 strong cards - Iorveth and Sheldon Skaggs and none more... While the Norther Realms lead by Radovid or Henselt became almost unbeatable, playing Scoiatel requires a great deal of luck in order to win the game. I do not like it, I think the decks should be equal in strength...

Just thoughts these, I do not force my opinions on anybody.

BTW - when will the Nilfgaard deck be available?

mdsn: I dont like the new medic limitation, but i feeel obligated to report that Sigfrida still can resurect Freyas - should it be possible or is it a error?

GICaesar: Snip

GICaesar: I don't like some of the changes.

The first thing that comes to mind is degrading Eredin from gold to silver... Why? Zoltan Chivay or Shani for example are gold, and the king of the wild hunt does not deserve it???

GICaesar: Also, as I play this a lot since I absolutely LOVE gwent, I see, or rather it seems to me, that when finishing a rouind in the monster deck it happens perhaps too often that - on the opponent side mostly - it is the strongest monster card that remains on the field... It happens so often to me that I doubt it to be an accident... And - when Eredin has been degraded to mere silver - why does that card never remain...

GICaesar: The Scoiatel deck... While in the witcher game it was one of the better decks and very strong, here in the gwent game it became probably the weakest. It has probably but 2 strong cards - Iorveth and Sheldon Skaggs and none more... While the Norther Realms lead by Radovid or Henselt became almost unbeatable, playing Scoiatel requires a great deal of luck in order to win the game. I do not like it, I think the decks should be equal in strength...