Destro: Thank you all for your posts in this topic, especially for all the constructive feedback. We posted on the forums expecting that many of you will be vocal about this. We want to assure you, that we always read your feedback and discuss it internally, even if we don’t always agree with some of it. You are vocal, so it means you care about GOG.com and we really do appreciate it.
Games have changed a lot in the past years and new titles made achievements, cloud saves and other online features become a standard rather than an extra. […] we believe that if we offer games with these features advertised to the general public, then the default installation flow is expected to result in a game with these features working out of the box. This is our reasoning for including the option to install GOG Galaxy during the game installation, and we do stand by it.
Yes, there are things which we can do better - there always are. Reading your feedback and giving it a second thought, we decided on the following:
1. […] once we roll out “new” installers with the option to install GOG Galaxy, we will add a separate download of the “classic” ones. Going forward we will offer the option to download “classic” installers whenever a game is offered via a “new” installer.
2. As mentioned earlier, we will work on making the GOG Galaxy installer smaller, but at the cost of it being online only.
3. We will launch the new installers in a couple of weeks once point 1 is ready. […]
One more thing to keep in mind: everyday we fight to make more great titles available to you, DRM-free. To release many of them we must support their online features, while at the same time developers request ways to automate upload and updating games. Without GOG Galaxy we couldn't offer many of the games we offer today at all, even if you don’t use GOG Galaxy to play or update them.
Once again thank you for your feedback. We hope the above answers your concerns.
Edit: pinned
• • • New Achievement ! Collected : Master Card [09]
Destro: Nothing changed about the "new" installers - they are standalone, backupable, offline working game installers, with option to disable GOG Galaxy installation if needed. Once we minimise GOG Galaxy size footprint on the said installers, installation of GOG Galaxy as a part of this flow will require online connection, but lack of it should be handled gracefully and not affect game installation at all.
Rixasha: [...] Opt-out is disgusting, but I think we're past trying to maintain any rose-tinted impressions about GOG anyway, so meh.
HypersomniacLive: The tactic is shady, no matter the colour of the galsses.
Some people said that it doesn't equate to the known, and mostly loathed, adware tactic since GOG Galaxy isn't a third party piece of S/W, but this very tactic is often used to install in-house S/W that one didn't ask for, and this is exactly the case here - forcing a piece of S/W on people that use the standalone, offline installers by choice, and don't want to use GOG Galaxy. […]
One will watch to uncheck the box, but it takes only one time to miss it for whatever reason. One will go through the hassle of uninstalling it instead of spending that time playing the game they've just installed, but it only takes one time too many to say "screw it" and leave it installed. And after that, all possibilities are open, especially if the default for GOG Galaxy is still to run at boot up. […]
As I said, I'll wait and see, but the insistence of going ahead with their initial plan with a couple of revisions, for now, feels more like they're buying time than actually listening and taking in our feedback.
GR00T: […] it's entirely possible they'll stop hosting two installer versions down the road* […]
*which I personally consider a distinct possibly, verging on 100% probability, as it's a lot of extra work and it's senseless to do it this way in the first place...
• • • New Achievement ! Collected : The Wild Card [10]
DyNaer: Sorry, Destro, you are stubborn,
You complicate things :
Client should be downloaded
alone and updated
alone. For reference it works fine for the Steam client... why it shouldn't working like this for Galaxy ?. ...I'm puzzled.... oh yes ... of course all is clear after reading CD Projekt 's focus for GOG (sarcasm)
Putting the client in the offline / backup installers is a non-sense, it's like putting an unwanted tool inside.. ..
Users wanting to use Galaxy already uses it , others who prefer the offline installers don't , if they use it just for getting the backup installers something went wrong with your initial ideas...it's like you want to drop the website and only use the client (i am almost certain that's the final step you have in mind).
Speaking of the users library (web) it's really starting to be a real mess :
- No more notifications
- Choose how you name the offline installers
definitely : either GOG internal number or the real game version (because it's starting to be the last case for some games.
- Now i use DownThemAll, it's working fine....no way to install Galaxy just to get the features i had in the past : you continuously destroy users experience via a browser because : you prefer to compete with Steam with a client ...
- Having 2 types of offline installers, will increase the workload for a result which already a pain with only one, because you don't take care a lot of the user library (web)...
- Your website & forum are just full of bugs, if some users (3rd party scripts) do better than you then shame on you... and with the new nav bar.... there's some performance issues....
Just a piece of advice (but you won't listen)....don't implement the client in the offline installers, just put a button to download the client in the nav bar.. and just a reminder , every game in the library has already a button 'TRY GOG GALAXY" -> We ain't blind .....
sigh......really disappointed...and for the moment i vote with my wallet till improvements ...but it's really an aggressive move towards those who prefer to use the website. I'm not against client... but client & website should be separate except for the offline installers (which should point to the same resource) ...your solution is a waste of space / time / and money...
Jemolk: At this point I'm willing to give GOG another chance. I always give second chances. I rarely give third chances, and never to companies. I don't expect perfection, so expecting them to get everything right on the first try seems unreasonable.
GR00T: I think at this point many of us felt that GOG was already operating on their third or fourth chance when they came out with this ill-conceived plan.
tfishell: I'm curious:
is anyone here not buying GOG games anymore […]
because of this or another recent issue? ValamirCleaver: I've cleared my wishlist & stopped buying […] For me it's been a culmination of things "here & there" over the past couple of years, but the disabling of web browser notifications (which weeks later still haven't been restored) plus these recent attempts at trying to trick those who want offline installers into installing Galaxy and the intelligence insulting excuses being bandied about as justification for doing so was the "final straw" for me. […]
If GOG wants to be "Steam Lite" I have no desire to further fund the folly of trying to "out Steam" Steam. GOG should be mindful of what worked well for them before the release of the Witcher 3 and Galaxy & not be so quick to "throw the customers under the bus" that kept them afloat the first 6 years of their existence in their shortsighted attempts at forcing into the lowest common denominator in trying to vendor lock-in more "client kiddies".
liquidsnakehpks: I dont know why but ever since they started pushing out galaxy and modern games on gog , i have kept away from the site more and more , you see i feel the place and the experience is no longer unique because , what they are doing already exists checkout gamersgate its pretty much what gog will be turning into soon.
Its pretty sad , i started using all of the three gog , gamersgate and steam around the same time way back , gog was always unique due to the good old games only feel and the community , now it just feels like those yearly call of duty releases.
[url=https://www.gamersgate.com/games?filter=offers,feature:12&prio=discount&list_style=list]https://www.gamersgate.com/games?filter=offers,feature:12&prio=discount&list_style=list[/url]
< link edited for DRM-Free offers display > certainly havent bought anything since ages , i doubt i will seeing how this is going...
• • • New Achievement ! Collected : Supah Wild Card [11]
garkham: I still want to believe. Please keep my eyes shut.
Once again, I'm a Galaxy lover because I do not care about the sort-of DRM it makes as long as I do not throw money to digital-and-online only things. After 5 years 2011 - 2015 of fighting everything digital, I now have Steam just to redeem the keys of the boxed games, and GOG for everything else (i.e. digital only but online on-demand). The pessimism of you guys makes me really sad and fearful. I really hope we all misread something here and I do not give all the money for nothing.
And I'm still secretly wanting to apply at GOG at some point, so I'd better stay optimistic ! :D
• • • New Achievement ! Collected : Xtra Sweesh Elusiv Card [12]
________
170607 ► Zeta version has launched and is now in
full effect ! Just remember : "If You Don't Peel, You Can't Play !"™