Posted September 12, 2016
Bah. I think this is a game that got the okay from JMich.
If nobody else cares about confirming whether this is an issue, I guess I'll leave this dead horse to rot and stink up the air.
He somehow seemed to completely neglect/discount the idea that "Wyrm just now revealed the event because it only just happened". I wouldn't have made a fuss if he hadn't overlooked such an obvious (to me) possibility when he was questioning the timing.
Refer to Post 6. It will be our best friend.
bler144: So yeah, as much as wyrm and others want to experiment, don't let us get to 9 no-lynch/non-votes until we've done a bit more. Keep your vote on someone, please.
Looks like most people disagree with me. My point is this: If simply having 50% of the players not having any vote placed is enough to move us into the next phase or force a No Lynch or w/e, then NOW, Day 1, is the best time to find that out. Not Day 4, when we've lost some people and several claims are on the board. If nobody else cares about confirming whether this is an issue, I guess I'll leave this dead horse to rot and stink up the air.
TammyTown: Wyrm - In your discussion with Nacho about the "event" you get after him for basically not knowing that the event you discussed was not something that you knew all the time. You tell him to keep his shade to himself and when he says that he just assumed that it was something you knew all the time, you respond with "just an honest mistake, huh". I'm trying to wrap my head around your response here. There is absolutely no reason why anyone in this game should know that your event was something that had just happened when you brought it forth, therefore it can be nothing other than an honest mistake that he assumed it was something you knew all along. Why do you expect that everyone should have just understood that?
Essentially, I assume Nacho is pretty smart. Reread where he was initially questioning me about the event, and how he was casting suspicion on me for taking so long to reveal it. Then ask yourself how he could have known anything at all about the timing between when my event occurred and when I talked about it having occurred. He somehow seemed to completely neglect/discount the idea that "Wyrm just now revealed the event because it only just happened". I wouldn't have made a fuss if he hadn't overlooked such an obvious (to me) possibility when he was questioning the timing.
Refer to Post 6. It will be our best friend.