I see a few replies to my post on refresh... will get to them later, I just decided I need to write down everyone's name and flavor revealed so far. If I'm gonna RP, let's do it properly I guess...
Brasas: Almost forgot, the comment about no more than 4
or else is odd to me. What the heck do you know that I don't?
Bookwyrm627: That 5-6 wolves on the same team mean town is probably screwed before the game starts.
With 5 wolves, town has to kill 5 wolves before 7 townies die. With 6 wolves, town has to kill 6 wolves (with little/no help from wolves) before 5 townies die.
snip
Ok. But if we manage to lynch wolves correctly, we gain "room". So those numbers are not absolute. Anyway, I get the assumptions, I am also assuming one scum team with circa 4 people. And I'm still keeping an eye on you.
SirCrimsonFox: Who was talking about no lynching? First I've heard of it, son. Are you the first one to say it?
[Raises hand] Post 44 if I recall Nacho's referencing it. But that bait didn't really get any significant bites...
Actually, I know I said I'd ride it out more. But you can't have missed all the mentions to no lynch so far... >:(
Brasas: 4) Is that so far from the typical 75% town ratio?
I'm not looking at this approach as a huge upside one, just as a low downside fallback.
5) Ok. I'm writing bottoms up. I covered this on the response to Bler.
And I already said somewhere I agree with Trenton until further notice.
6) Urgh. I'm going to give my reads since I see we're there. You always think Yog is scum Bler... and I'm the one that always keeps the powder try.
bler144: 4) That's why I like you. ... snip
5) Well, I'm not sure you did. ... no clear argument on why he would incorporate it specifically as a design feature in his first modded game. How do you get from A to C there?
6) Yes, it's a good thing one of us held back on voting for him.
Bler, you'll need to help me out. I got a bit lost.
What did you like on 4)? The number logic showing the low downside? You go on to speak of my meta so I'm unsure.
5) No one asked me to try to mindread Drealmer. I'm as puzzled by his design intentions as anyone else. And want to try and relax and see what happens above all else right now.
To recap. Nacho asked if my mentioning no lynch was just because of Drealmer's meta. I said I covered that in replying to you. You had said yourself
"it's a bit odd coming from Brasas" and replying to that I gave one other reason for what I had suggested: the previous game D1. * Implication being, maybe No Lynch is not such a bad idea also here. That said, I also then added to Nacho that I agreed with Trent already to drop that. Which to be explicit now, the main reason I spoke of No Lynch was to get reactions.
So what I covered in replying to you was that, no, Drealmer's meta was
not the only reason. And then I hinted to him by mentioning Trent, the main reason, which had been baiting.
(the PPS on post 44 itself was hinting that I was mostly baiting)
6) I didn't get. Is it sarcastic? Is it earnest? What does it refer to? I have not considered voting for Yog... I'm just paying attention to him. The only one I was leaning to vote was Ix, but I think there's already three on his wagon and so I'll keep my powder dry.
* That I still think in the previous game with
that wagon no lynch would have been better - it was an all town wagon until the scum hammer if you'll recall, and it left us at MYLO on D2.
PS: Your Cristi vote = heh >:(