It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
snowkatt: i bought a used copy of diablo II for 1 euro
<i>*coughs*</i> :P
avatar
jsidhu762: I think the update is for China only.
It's for worldwide. There's no 'I think'.
Cool. A D2 update. I cannot wait.
avatar
snowkatt: i bought a used copy of diablo II for 1 euro
avatar
Vythonaut: <i>*coughs*</i> :P
either or
its not like i care to remember ;p
avatar
snowkatt: either or
its not like i care to remember ;p
Looking forward to your future posts.
"You can actually buy Diablo II for 50 cents."
"I was in a games shop the other day and bought Diablo II for 25 cents"
...
...
...
"When I last saw it, I've had to invent a new form of small change in order for the retailer to not give me Diablo II for free. I call it 'per cents'."
avatar
snowkatt: either or
its not like i care to remember ;p
avatar
Fenixp: Looking forward to your future posts.
"You can actually buy Diablo II for 50 cents."
"I was in a games shop the other day and bought Diablo II for 25 cents"
...
...
...
"When I last saw it, I've had to invent a new form of small change in order for the retailer to not give me Diablo II for free. I call it 'per cents'."
it was used
but just for you
ill just refer to it as costing me 1.50 ;p
avatar
mobutu: It absolutely doesn't matter how many likes a trailer has or how many people will buy a ticket to see the flop.
Lately there is a new mantra that the more people see or like a movie equals succes.
Depends on how you define "success". I'd imagine most companies define "success" as "made a decent amount of profit", in which case how many people buy a ticket is absolutely a big factor in a movie being successful.

If one defines a successful movie by its popularity, then more people liking the movie directly equates to the movie being more successful.

What is YOUR definition of success?

avatar
Elmofongo: Blizzard back then usually let the bad guys win.
Mixed successes, sometimes.

The Humans won WC2.

Archimonde was pretty definitively stopped in WC3. The orcs were freed from their slavery. Arthas became the Liche King, but that might have been a better result overall than Kil'jaeden and Illidan being successful (and thus having one less foe).

In D2, no one really knew the full consequences of destroying the Worldstone. Almost all of the Lords of Hell were killed, though.
I used to play so much of those fun maps in Warcraft 3. Great game on LAN parties especially since there's a lot of variety and they are much more accessible than melee maps. One of my favourite was this dungeon RPG map made in Greek mythology and you could even save your hero with a code that you then loaded (with items) next time. Lots of grinding but it was fun while it lasted.
I am pretty happy about this, it is nice that they are reviving there old products to work with modern day os and hardware without issues. warcraft 3 has given me many hours of fun for the 30 dollars I spent compared to other games.

Now lets hope for a warcraft 4 :p
low rated
blizzard sucks cock.
Oh, look. Some kid learned new insults. How adorable!