It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
EDIT: BEWARE SPOILER IN POST #3 BY Gog8

The X-Men movie franchise really is a rollercoaster, isn't it? It finally managed to return to grace with Days of Future Past, and fucked it up shortly thereafter with Apocalypse, and now is back in great form again with Logan. It's also really weird how the last Wolverine movie (at least for that version of the character) is also the first really good one. They only finally got it right in time for it to end.

And it really is a very good movie. It's almost astonishingly out of place in the current supehero movie scene. Although it's only been 5 years since Dark Knight Rises, the landscape is very different. Seriousness is not welcome in comic book movies anymore, and this is about as serious and bleak as it gets.The future it shows for the X-Men is really tragic, to the point where it makes the epilgue of the Days of Future past seem like a cruel joke. There are no laughs to be had, the action is brutal and bloody and not in the gooy Deadpool way, and while the action scenes are quite impressive and pack quite a punch, it's the moments characters share in between that make this movie. Jackman and Stewart give it their damndest and it's almost heartbreaking to see Logan taking care of the elderly Xavier who is losing his mind, but still tries to save his last student from his own dark side.

It's not a perfect movie- there is a lot here that is very predictable, including an almost literal Chekov's Gun, the villains are pretty bland and forgettable and the story has some... well maybe not outright plot holes, but let's say there are some daubts about a thing or two. It's not my new favourite superhero movie, but it's still pretty damn great.
Post edited March 05, 2017 by Breja
avatar
Breja: It's not a perfect movie- there is a lot here that is very predictable, including an almost literal Chekov's Gun, the villains are pretty bland and forgettable and the story has some... well maybe not outright plot holes, but let's say there are some daubts about a thing or two. It's not my new favourite superhero movie, but it's still pretty damn great.
10\10 for your review. I liked Brejas use with the Chekovs Gun reference. Not many reviewers today know the reference but to know and use it is very awe inspiring. While others reviews are bland or aloof about the matter at hand this review hits it on the nose like the Sword of Damocles even if I havent seen the movie.
low rated
Just saw it today in IMAX. The last scene with Logan and X-23 was very touching.
The big surprise in the movie was X-24 - Wolverine clone.
avatar
Gog8: Just saw it today in IMAX. The last scene with Logan and X-23 was very touching.
The big surprise in the movie was X-24 - Wolverine clone.
HOW ABOUT A SPOILER WARNING!?
I would rate it, pretty damn great really.

And also holy sh!t I wanna see Ghost in the Shell.
Post edited March 05, 2017 by bad_fur_day1
avatar
bad_fur_day1: I would rate it, pretty damn great really.

And also holy sh!t I wanna see Ghost in the Shell.
Yes! I agree. Don't forget about Kong Skull Island.
This is the best Wolverine movie and one of the best in the X-franchise. Highly recommended, especially for the acting. Hugh Jackman and Patrick Stewart really bring out their acting chops in this one, and Dafne Keen (Laura) is very good, too.
Yeah, that Children of Men remake was great, wasn't it? :D
avatar
babark: Yeah, that Children of Men remake was great, wasn't it? :D
Oh come on, now I HAVE to watch it. It would be my first superhero movie in years (in the theatre, that is).
avatar
Vainamoinen: Oh come on, now I HAVE to watch it. It would be my first superhero movie in years (in the theatre, that is).
I think calling it a "Superhero movie" confuses what it actually is. There's nothing superheroey about it other than that it has a guy with claws who can heal faster than normal and a telepath.
avatar
Vainamoinen: Oh come on, now I HAVE to watch it. It would be my first superhero movie in years (in the theatre, that is).
avatar
babark: I think calling it a "Superhero movie" confuses what it actually is. There's nothing superheroey about it other than that it has a guy with claws who can heal faster than normal and a telepath.
Yeah, it's only a "superhero movie" because of it's association with the X-Men franchise. There are no costumes, masks, super-villains etc. Although that X-Men background is important, it really makes especially Xavier's fate all the more tragic (the "Westchester incident").

Also, spot on with that Children of Men comparison. I'm kinda angry at myself for not seeing it before you mentioned it :D