It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Telika: don't think there's room for any such "spectator entry point" in WH40k's nihilism, which makes it pretty much non-mainstreamable unless heavily, fundamentally bastardized.
This video brings up a potential character at the end: Ciaphas Cain.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UhMywHUBbEM

And brings up a very good point. The main focus of the show should not be Space Marines, because they are not human. They might look like them, but far from it.
Post edited December 21, 2022 by idbeholdME
avatar
Telika: It will need heroes, it will need good guys, it will need genuine values. WH40k is all about horrible beings fighting each others fanatically, the least horrid of them being the zealots of a totalitarian theocracy. Those will be the good guys in no popular show. Eitheir their side will be transcripted as an enlightened democracy, or the heroes will be morally conflicted, questionning their hierarchy's propaganda, and... this would not fly in that universe.
I think you are over exaggerating, there are plenty of characters in 40k that would easily qualify as "heroes" or even "good guys" in the standard sense of the term, not everybody in 40k is a constantly some insane psychopath maniac spending their days bathing in the blood of orphans and puppies, yes they might be cogs of a genocidal fanatical empire, but as individuals lots of them are not any worse than your average TV or movies warrior character.

If we can have TV series where the "good guys" are U-Boat sailors during WWII, I don't think having a 40k series where the heroes are some Militarum soldiers or some space marines would be too complicated.
avatar
Telika: Even The Boys had one "pure of heart" innocent character the public is meant to identify to. Even the Shield was grounded by some morally decent characters (Wyms, Sofer, Wagenbach if you forgive some experimental cat strangulation), even The Wire featured some clumsy idealism and noble intent. I don't think there's room for any such "spectator entry point" in WH40k's nihilism, which makes it pretty much non-mainstreamable unless heavily, fundamentally bastardized.
True, the boys has Huey and Starlight as the actual "good guys" we want to root for and Butcher is having a change of heart to be more "good" compared to his comic counterpart.

I dont really know the franchise but I can also see WH40K do something similar, making a faction or group of characters be more sympathetic and heroic than their canon interpretation to get the audience invested. They did that with Arcane and it got popular as a result (I think TV Tropes calls is adaptational heroism). I dont know how the hardcore fans will take it but with a decent budget and good story, it could become a hit. Im surprised studios arnt invested more in other IP types now that the superhero franchise has honestly hit a breaking point with fatigue.
After reading more on the Cavill issue...

... seems the "leaker" is alleging Cavill was addicted to video game...

... as well as being problematic when working with women.

Where have I heard that before?

Ugh.
avatar
Tokyo_Bunny_8990: I dont really know the franchise but I can also see WH40K do something similar, making a faction or group of characters be more sympathetic and heroic than their canon interpretation to get the audience invested.
As I said earlier I don't really thimk it would be really difficult, there are plenty of heroic characters in the lore regardless of what their factions might be doing. And no matter how many genocides the Imperium might be committing in their free time, if you put human vs chaos daemons or Tyranids you won't have too many difficulties making them more "sympathetic" than the opposition.

For example if you take Space Marine sold here, Titus can definitely be considered a sympathetic and relatable hero despite him being a zealot follower of the Imperium.
avatar
kai2: Where have I heard that before?
I don't really care too much about the issue of even Cavil himself but based on what I read if seems mostly second hand hersay and straws grasping and not really anything concrete. The usual case of "This person is popular let's try very very hard to find anything, no matter how tenuous, to cancel him" dumb drama.
Post edited December 21, 2022 by Gersen
avatar
kai2: After reading more on the Cavill issue...

... seems the "leaker" is alleging Cavill was addicted to video game...

... as well as being problematic when working with women.

Where have I heard that before?

Ugh.
The fact that they needed to rely on video games of all things as the root of Cavill's addiction is embarrassing. Make it drugs and alcohol like the rest of the Hollywood elite lol.

Honestly it doesnt matter. The Witcher Netflix franchise is dead. I dont think people are going to tune into season 3 even if Cavill leaving wasnt a factor after the atrocity that was season 2 alienating hardcore fans. Given the fact that Cavill is leaving, I also doubt season 3 is going to be any better given that if it was, he probably wouldnt have walked.

The Witcher spinoff is also getting wrecked by critics and it isnt a surprise given how generic fantasy it looks. I only hope CDPR takes this as an important case study of what not to do when they "modernize" Witcher 1 with their remake.
...
Post edited December 21, 2022 by kai2
avatar
Tokyo_Bunny_8990: The fact that they needed to rely on video games of all things as the root of Cavill's addiction is embarrassing. Make it drugs and alcohol like the rest of the Hollywood elite lol.
But that's exactly the point. Those who try to smear Cavill ARE Hollywood elite (or at least Hollywood elite wannabe), so they want to distance him from Hollywood as much as possible. After all, drugs, alcohol or mental issues are common and understandable addictions, they deserve compassion. Games? Much more videogames? That's something most people are still weary of.
avatar
Tokyo_Bunny_8990: I can also see WH40K do something similar, making a faction or group of characters be more sympathetic and heroic than their canon interpretation to get the audience invested.
It would break a bit the specificity of WH40k, though, and make it some sort of run-of-the-mill Doom, Aliens, Starcraft thingy. What's amusing with WH40k is this full-fledged, tongue-in-cheek, ironic fascism. Where every stance is outrageous, and badassery becomes its own caricature. There's something inherently satirical and hopeless that would be lost if one side is reduced to the conventions of general public consumable heroes. That's why I think that it'd require bastardization beyond the point of retaining its originality. This originality being situated in that commercially cumbersome place.

That being said, yes, it could become its own thing, and, who knows, a thing of value (like the movie james bond is fun in its own right, or the cartoon teenage mutant turtles can define a franchise of its own). But... well, I mean...
avatar
LootHunter: But that's exactly the point. Those who try to smear Cavill ARE Hollywood elite (or at least Hollywood elite wannabe), so they want to distance him from Hollywood as much as possible. After all, drugs, alcohol or mental issues are common and understandable addictions, they deserve compassion. Games? Much more videogames? That's something most people are still weary of.
Yeah. And somehow Ezra Miller still has a career despite doing heinous things. Hell, there are fictional supervillains that are less evil than Miller. Nevermind the fact that Hollywood still loves Polanski despite being a convicted p*** r*****.

avatar
Telika: It would break a bit the specificity of WH40k, though, and make it some sort of run-of-the-mill Doom, Aliens, Starcraft thingy. What's amusing with WH40k is this full-fledged, tongue-in-cheek, ironic fascism. Where every stance is outrageous, and badassery becomes its own caricature. There's something inherently satirical and hopeless that would be lost if one side is reduced to the conventions of general public consumable heroes. That's why I think that it'd require bastardization beyond the point of retaining its originality. This originality being situated in that commercially cumbersome place.

That being said, yes, it could become its own thing, and, who knows, a thing of value (like the movie james bond is fun in its own right, or the cartoon teenage mutant turtles can define a franchise of its own). But... well, I mean...
It sounds like WH40k is similar to Starship Troopers in that regard. Audiences missed the point of that movie by a country mile though.

The tv show could be its own thing but I do think a cynical and dark storyline with no heroes could work. Might hurt Cavill's image after playing good guys like Superman (but would be good for his long-term career) and we do seem to be shifting to sci-fi being the new craze. Regardless, the story has to be good or people wont continue.
I am sure Liam will do well xD
Oh I will enjoy observing the trainwreck that Netflix's Witcher shows have become. There is no hope for them.
avatar
LootHunter: But that's exactly the point. Those who try to smear Cavill ARE Hollywood elite (or at least Hollywood elite wannabe), so they want to distance him from Hollywood as much as possible. After all, drugs, alcohol or mental issues are common and understandable addictions, they deserve compassion. Games? Much more videogames? That's something most people are still weary of.
avatar
Tokyo_Bunny_8990: Yeah. And somehow Ezra Miller still has a career despite doing heinous things. Hell, there are fictional supervillains that are less evil than Miller. Nevermind the fact that Hollywood still loves Polanski despite being a convicted p*** r*****.

avatar
Telika: It would break a bit the specificity of WH40k, though, and make it some sort of run-of-the-mill Doom, Aliens, Starcraft thingy. What's amusing with WH40k is this full-fledged, tongue-in-cheek, ironic fascism. Where every stance is outrageous, and badassery becomes its own caricature. There's something inherently satirical and hopeless that would be lost if one side is reduced to the conventions of general public consumable heroes. That's why I think that it'd require bastardization beyond the point of retaining its originality. This originality being situated in that commercially cumbersome place.

That being said, yes, it could become its own thing, and, who knows, a thing of value (like the movie james bond is fun in its own right, or the cartoon teenage mutant turtles can define a franchise of its own). But... well, I mean...
avatar
Tokyo_Bunny_8990: It sounds like WH40k is similar to Starship Troopers in that regard. Audiences missed the point of that movie by a country mile though.

The tv show could be its own thing but I do think a cynical and dark storyline with no heroes could work. Might hurt Cavill's image after playing good guys like Superman (but would be good for his long-term career) and we do seem to be shifting to sci-fi being the new craze. Regardless, the story has to be good or people wont continue.
My impression of Cavill is that he would rather stay true to the franchise and have a smaller but dedicated viewership number than a billion mainstream viewers, since making it mainstream means pleasing the mainstream media, ... and we all know what they demand by now., and what the dire results are. He has experienced for himself directly what happens when you try to please the mainstream in Hollywood.

The fans do of-course understand the darker and more sinister themes of Warhammer.

Judging by recent movie events it's clear that the gap or discrepancy between mainstream movie critics and the actual consumers is probably the biggest it has ever been, nobody trusts their opinions anymore (apart from Hollywood and politicians). The mainstream critics opinions doesn't seem to have much if any effect on actual moviegoers or viewercounts, on the masses.

I think the Starship Trooper movie's mistake was that it did not go far enough at the start of the movie to make mainstream viewers understand the underlying theme or concept. Perhaps they could have marketed this idea better or clearer as well, before the movie's launch. So how they market Warhammer is crucial, its how you prepare or educate people who are unfamiliar with a franchise.

I'm thinking of the recent Dune movie as well. It too explores similar "facist" and hierarchal or feudal ideas, yet the director and writer managed to make the viewer accept or understand this from the beginning, what the movie is going for.

After the success of the Dark Souls franchise and related games, as well as shows like Game of Thrones, a larger number of people are more open to darker themed movies or tv-shows than when Starship Troopers was released.I think people are more "educated" in this regard, it's not as niche anymore to be into horror and more darker themes.
Post edited December 26, 2022 by 72_hour_Richard