It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Alaric.us: This whole debate is utterly alien to me since I never understood why human nudity is a big deal. Are there really any parts of the human body which cause harm to those who see them? Idiocy in it's purest form, if you ask me.

Personally, I don't care if someone is naked regardless of their gender or sexual identity.
Likewise I don't care if someone sees me naked regardless of their gender or sexual identity.

Hopefully one day this non-issue will be treated as such and there will be single showers/bathrooms for all.
avatar
Dalthnock:
avatar
gamesfreak64: omg its about that ? so most of the posts i saw flying by is about that?

i can be short about that:

like you said: i also dont care if some one runs, walks, or fly by naked.... i wont show myself naked cause i wont do that,
but if people, men. women should want to walk nude or with very little clothing, then everyone should also respect that.

The only thing that would be unwise, is to leave your doors open, and expect no one will clean your house :D hahahaha, but thats only logical to close and lock the doors.
avatar
Dalthnock: No, it's not about that.

I couldn't care less if adults are naked in front of each other or what they're showing.

I just don't want it to be legal for a middle-aged man to shower next to an little girl! Hell, they shouldn't even do it in front of little boys, but at least boys know that what they're seeing is just a bigger version of what they have.

It's STILL wrong and inexcusable, but there's nothing I can reasonably do there other than demanding security in each & every public toilet or shower.
ouch, i didnt know that, sorry to read that...
that is not okay, but i guess thats up to the ones who run that business to keep things safe.

I read that many more are installing cameras, even in our country some supermarkets seem to have them or want to install these, maybe these are for their own security, i am not sure of that, but i read it a long time ago in a
newspaper.

But now i come to think of it: it seems cams also need to be connected to a network aswell, and nowadays anyone seems to tap the networks (cause apparenlty the safity is like shit) allowing any intruder to see what the camera's see, i dont know, the last few years too many shit is hitting the fans, we heard bad news in the 80s but i must admit that the last decades things got out of hand and i am afraid it will ony get worse,
Post edited May 21, 2016 by gamesfreak64
avatar
Alaric.us: I'm not trying to make you see the world in the same way I do. Obviously we disagree, and that's perfectly normal. All I'm saying is that I really don't think (nor is there any evidence) that a sight of a penis (regardless of the age of the owner) is going to cause harm to those who happen to glance at it (again, regardless of the age or sex of the onlooker.)

Now, if the said middle aged man tried molesting a young girl — do to him what is done to such people. And this is regardless of whether he did that in the bathroom or in a restaurant or in a concert hall. Causing harm to others must not be tolerated. I just don't see being make, naked, and middle aged as a crime.
Fair enough, but my fear is that this is simply the first step on a much bigger agenda.

Remember, those who WERE THERE when something happened that drastically altered our way of life, didn't properly realise it until it had fully happened.

We're there, now. It's happening. Call me crazy, I don't mind. But if my rants & raves make something, anything, shift in the background that will stop this from happening without anyone ever realising, including me, I will gladly be pointed & jeered at for the rest of my life by everyone around me.

It will have been worth it.
avatar
Randalator: There have also been reports of alien abductions, alien pregnancies, chem trails, lizard people and moon nazis.
avatar
Dalthnock: Do those reports have photos, names, witnesses?

http://abc7chicago.com/news/man-chokes-8-year-old-girl-in-south-loop-bathroom-police-say/1336656
There is nothing in there about trans-gender
avatar
haydenaurion: Again, that comment doesn't give very many specifics on the situation. We don't even know if the showers were gender segregated. The guy commenting may just be trolling for all we know.

If you want to get all worked up over this and throw accusations that we don't care about children's rights I won't stop you, I was only trying to help alleviate your concerns.
I'm sorry.

This is the one issue that does get me bent out of shape. Children. I don't even like the little brats. But every time I read something that happened to a child, I need to take a couple of minutes to breathe, calm down & remind myself there was nothing I could do.

And the things I do read, including a judge releasing a father who admitted to abusing his daughter & scolding the mother for interfering, because the child was 13 already & children today - in the words of the judge - are sexually active much sooner.

Never mind the guy was the girl's father & she DID NOT consent. But the judge is obviously a paedophile, they're everywhere.

So yeah, children are my weak point. I tend to go blind with rage & start lashing out.

This isn't your fault. I apologise.
avatar
mechmouse: There is nothing in there about trans-gender
OF COURSE THERE ISN'T!

This isn't about transgenders, it's about the people who will take advantage of a law that will only benefit 0.3% of the population!

If this law is accepted in the rest of the US AND spreads through Europe & other places, there will be MANY MORE child abusers & rapists using the women's toilets than there will be trans people!

THAT is the problem! THAT is my concern!
Post edited May 21, 2016 by Dalthnock
For some reason I keep thinking of the scene in The Beastmaster where Rip Torn is chucking the kids into the fire.
welcome to the wonderful world of political correctness dictatorship
high rated
avatar
dtgreene: What if the little girl has a mental disability that prevents her from showering on her own, the girl's mother is busy or out of the picture, and the middle-aged man happens to be her father, who is taking care of her? (For purposes of this example, assume the father is not abusive.)
Do you know what the word empathy means? Have you ever just once tried to put yourself in someone else's place and say that maybe, just maybe their feelings are important too? That considering other people's feelings and their point of view might be a thing. That if a 7-year old girl is scared to shower with a 40-year old man who identifies as a woman and still has an erect penis next to the 7-year old girls face in the shower, that it might be a perspective worth listening to. And that listening to that 7-year old girl's concerns is NOT transphobia.

Unlike you I have empathy and I can see the case from both sides. Both kids AND transgender people should be respected and cared for. But your outright dismissal of the little girl's feelings is simply preposterous.
Anyone care to count how many times someone tried to move the topic away from children - which are the main point of this thread, stated quite explicitly in the first post - to something else entirely?

And that's what happens every single time someone tries to discuss this issue. And every time it happens, I get a little bit more scared.

Because either people have been conditioned to overlook the topic at hand & veer off on meaningless tangents that will make sure nothing ever leads anywhere OR, even more worryingly,

They do it on purpose because of a hidden, but not particularly hard to disclose agenda, if you take two seconds to think about it.

avatar
dtgreene: What if the little girl has a mental disability that prevents her from showering on her own, the girl's mother is busy or out of the picture, and the middle-aged man happens to be her father, who is taking care of her? (For purposes of this example, assume the father is not abusive.)
avatar
jepsen1977: Do you know what the word empathy means? Have you ever just once tried to put yourself in someone else's place and say that maybe, just maybe their feelings are important too? That considering other people's feelings and their point of view might be a thing. That if a 7-year old girl is scared to shower with a 40-year old man who identifies as a woman and still has an erect penis next to the 7-year old girls face in the shower, that it might be a perspective worth listening to. And that listening to that 7-year old girl's concerns is NOT transphobia.

Unlike you I have empathy and I can see the case from both sides. Both kids AND transgender people should be respected and cared for. But your outright dismissal of the little girl's feelings is simply preposterous.
THIS!

I love you. Thank you!

And if you notice, dtgreene more or less exposed himself unwittingly on another post, when he mentioned that children should also have the right to drink, smoke, etc... emphasis on the etc.

He was also the first to try to deviate the topic, right on the first reply post.

Hmmm...
Post edited May 22, 2016 by Dalthnock
low rated
avatar
Dalthnock: Anyone care to count how many times someone tried to move the topic away from children - which are the main point of this thread, stated quite explicitly in the first post - to something else entirely?

And that's what happens every single time someone tries to discuss this issue. And every time it happens, I get a little bit more scared.

Because either people have been conditioned to overlook the topic at hand & veer off on meaningless tangents that will make sure nothing ever leads anywhere OR, even more worryingly,

They do it on purpose because of a hidden, but not particularly hard to disclose agenda, if you take two seconds to think about it.
If someone was to ask me, I imagine I'd tell them that:

a) There is no need to treat children as a holy cow.
b) There is no need to come up with conspiracy theories.

Luckily, nobody is asking me.
avatar
Dalthnock: And if you notice, dtgreene more or less exposed himself unwittingly on another post, when he mentioned that children should also have the right to drink, smoke, etc... emphasis on the etc.

He was also the first to try to deviate the topic, right on the first reply post.

Hmmm...
Also, dtgreene. is an anagram of greed.net, which, though I have no evidence for it, is clearly a link to a darknet group.
avatar
Alaric.us: If someone was to ask me, I imagine I'd tell them that:

a) There is no need to treat children as a holy cow.
b) There is no need to come up with conspiracy theories.

Luckily, nobody is asking me.
Valid points.

However, if there's anything that should be regarded as holy, in my opinion, it should be children. You know, the ones who will continue & hopefully improve everything you've done up until now.

That is not to say they should be treated as small gods, however. I am a fierce proponent of tough love & building character. Make sure they're as ready as possible as soon as possible to be able to fend for themselves. But that's another topic.

As for the second, I can only hope I'm blowing this way out of proportion. But if anyone thinks that child molesters & rapists won't try to take advantage of these laws as much as they can, then I got a few plots of land on Mars to sell you.
avatar
Dalthnock:
The problem is with people abusing children we got it, but your wording is bloody awful, to say the least.

The problem isn't with gender, is people abusing children.

Priests, parents, teachers, babysitters, uncles, cousins, etc. All of those have already been found of committing child abuse.

But again, you wording make it so that trans people using bathrooms are perpetuating or facilitating child abuse. The correlation comes as fear mongering.

There's no political agenda to facilitate abuse of children, stop with this retarded assessment [i](
Also, quit accusing people, that's even more retarded. You babble about agendas and what not, and here you are funneling people into your conspiracy. Take out the tinfoil hat).[/i]


Public bathrooms are no room for children without parents period.
Pedophiles are scum.
Pretty sure people care about children rights, but they are busy spreading fear instead of education.
Can I start posting BrassEye clips yet?

I'm going to do it anyway :)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEolSjlcqng
avatar
neurasthenya: The problem is with people abusing children we got it, but your wording is bloody awful, to say the least.

The problem isn't with gender, is people abusing children.

Priests, parents, teachers, babysitters, uncles, cousins, etc. All of those have already been found of committing child abuse.

But again, you wording make it so that trans people using bathrooms are perpetuating or facilitating child abuse. The correlation comes as fear mongering.

There's no political agenda to facilitate abuse of children, stop with this retarded assessment [i](
Also, quit accusing people, that's even more retarded. You babble about agendas and what not, and here you are funneling people into your conspiracy. Take out the tinfoil hat).[/i]

Public bathrooms are no room for children without parents period.
Pedophiles are scum.
Pretty sure people care about children rights, but they are busy spreading fear instead of education.
I have been saying all along that the problem is NOT trans people using the toilets of their choice. Please read MY posts, not the twisted replies to them.

I have been trying to separate trans people from this issue as much as I can - I DO NOT believe that they will do whatever to children.

I am merely stating that paedophiles & rapists WILL take advantage of these laws a whole lot more than anyone else.
low rated
avatar
Alaric.us: If someone was to ask me, I imagine I'd tell them that:

a) There is no need to treat children as a holy cow.
b) There is no need to come up with conspiracy theories.

Luckily, nobody is asking me.
avatar
Dalthnock: Valid points.

However, if there's anything that should be regarded as holy, in my opinion, it should be children. You know, the ones who will continue & hopefully improve everything you've done up until now.

That is not to say they should be treated as small gods, however. I am a fierce proponent of tough love & building character. Make sure they're as ready as possible as soon as possible to be able to fend for themselves. But that's another topic.

As for the second, I can only hope I'm blowing this way out of proportion. But if anyone thinks that child molesters & rapists won't try to take advantage of these laws as much as they can, then I got a few plots of land on Mars to sell you.
I don't see a child as a more valuable human, nor do I believe that the interests of a child take priority over the interests of an adult. All members of society should be protected from harm. Not just children. When the interests of two people collide, there should not be an automatic judgement in favor of a child. Children should be offered the same consideration and the same protections as everyone else.

Regarding your last paragraph, I think you vastly overestimate the amount of child molesters and rapists in the world. You are making it sound as though they are literally hiding behind every bush, just waiting to pounce the moment you turn your head around. Yes, criminals and deviants like that certainly exist. But they pose substantially less danger than tired drivers.