KneeTheCap: "Just to be sure" isn't really a reason. Innocent until proven guilty, no?
I think the lynch mob has decided that it's more effective to just to provide fertile grounds for libel and to hell with the consequences.
I'm really surprised that GOG is tolerating this thread as it probably opens them up for liability if somebody is defamed or gets scammed anyway.
stg83: Indeed that is how it should be, but there is no way to prove whether a person is using multiple accounts or not and if there is no record of this possibility then people on the forum won't know any better. It is a conundrum.
rtcvb32: I know a number of sites log the
IP address of the poster so using multiple accounts could be proven if they aren't using
TOR or something...
It's not really their place to police this. Unless they choose to change their ToS and provide facilities for trading, I see no reason why they should get involved with this unless there's court paperwork telling them to do so.
PaterAlf: I would say that it is a little extreme to put someone on a list of known scammers, just because he
might have two accounts. As far as I can see he didn't scam anybody by now. We should give every user the benefit of doubt and must be careful to not start a witch hunt.
reaver894: Well I can tell you that I do have 2 accounts, does that make me a scammer? Or an idiot that locked himself out and while waiting for it to come back to mind i had a chat here instead...
You're just saying that so we buy Driftmoon, you dirty scammer. How much they paying you? ;-P