Spectrum_Legacy: I can't really explain this any better than I already did, so I won't repeat myself.
neumi5694: You don't have to explain it better, I understood your point of view, I just don't share your opinion.
Edit:
Spectrum_Legacy: There is no logic nor variable as to why one would be allowed the rollback while the other didn't,
neumi5694: That might be true or not, but what difference does it make? They don't want it, it's not there. Easy as that.
Or someone messed up and the old stuff was deleted accidentaly.
This is by far not the only game without rollback option.
That's completely fine, I'm not threatening your opinion in any way. Though I found it funny that you took it upon yourself from get go to defend gog in this case, but then again I'm nowhere near as invested in this place as you are. And judging by the increased frequency where gog and censorship are mentioned together in one sentence, I might never be as well.
That covers your question too, "What difference does it make?". To you? None, obviously. To me? After seeing that gog doesn't care, I've fixed the censored games on my end, made a binary diff patches for both and adjusted my purchases since then as mentioned before. After all it's a toss up between customers vs consumers here, fans of stores and fans of games, so opinions about priorities and import will inevitably vary. We learned something new here after all.