dtgreene: Unfortunately, the lengthy cutscenes (in particular, there's one at the start), which can't be skipped, mean the game doesn't qualify.
Ancient-Red-Dragon: Well yes, it wouldn't,
if one is going by a very strict literal adherence the rules the OP stated.
However, I would suggest that the OP may want to relax his rules somewhat in some cases, as otherwise he'd missing out on ever playing great games such as that Ys: Origin one.
It's exactly what he asked for 98% of the time...and then 2% of the time it's not.
So then the question is: is it worth not playing the game and hence not experiencing the 98% of its content which he would likely consider to be "good stuff" for the sake of avoiding the 2% of the content that he might consider to be "bad stuff"?
I'd argue that no, that is not enough cutscene content to make it be worth skipping the game over, and the very favorable ratio of action:cutscenes makes it worth putting up with a bit of content that is not "perfect" according to OP's criteria.
Honestly, since the topic is about jumping right in, I would weigh the start of the game, the very beginning of it, particularly heavily. For a game to fit the topic, the action really needs to start right away.
In the first few minutes, I believe Ys Origin is 100% cutscene and 0% gameplay, and as a result it does not fit this topic.
Ancient-Red-Dragon: I'd argue that no, that is not enough cutscene content to make it be worth skipping the game over, and the very favorable ratio of action:cutscenes makes it worth putting up with a bit of content that is not "perfect" according to OP's criteria.
Whether the game is worth playing, and whether the game fits the topic, are not the same thing, and Ys Origin does not fit the topic.
Also, even a tiny portion of the game can ruin the rest; while it may not be the case with cutscenes (if the player is a bit patient), it *is* the case when part of a game is particularly frustrating or presents an accessibility issue.