Tytus-: I watched last night The Lost City of Z* (or something like that) I thought it wasn't very good.
andysheets1975: I'm trying to psych myself up for watching that one, because the book was really good, but the trailers look so dull...
I watched It over the weekend. I thought it was pretty good. Definitely looks to be one of the better Stephen King movies, although that's not too hard considering how awful most of them are. Hopefully the second part will be good.
Well, I went in expecting a completely different version of the book. I thought it would be more accurately based on Fawcetts spiritual and esoteric side regarding the true meaning of the City of Z and his true reasons for finding it.
It could have been a very Indiana Jone's type tale, but instead they chose to go a very bland path where not much of anything happens. You see some piranhas and some illness but not much else, far different from all the perils the book and Fawcett describe. Even in current Amazonian adventures, it is known to contain some vile creatures and treacheries. My mother grew up in Ecuador and would tell me how you never venture too deep into the jungles or you won't come back, cannibal tribes etc SPOILER (I know they were in the movie, but friendly cannibals? come on..well,mostly friendly, heh) Though in the movie it looks easier to trek through than an episode of Survivorman.
I was expecting the movie to touch much more on this:
http://www.jasoncolavito.com/blog/percy-fawcett-victim-of-a-theosophical-obsession The whole premise of the movie is completely wrong. It wasn't about finding an ancient civilization that was 'advanced' for their time. The Incas, Mayans, and Aztects were all known and believed to be very real. It was something much
More.