It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Community
General discussionIt is time to pay attention - Infowars(2004 posts) (2004 posts) 
(2004 posts) 
Pages:
1
3
4
5
6
7
25
50
75
100
125
134
This is my favourite topic
Posted September 10, 2016
low rated
avatar
DaCostaBR: Using as a source on Trump and Hillary news a website whose chairman is also Trump's campaign chief was hilarious enough, but now we also have vaccine paranoia?

You're just shooting in every direction, aren't you?
http://www.naturalnews.com/038796_meningitis_vaccine_children_paralyzed.html
http://vactruth.com/2013/01/06/paralyzed-after-meningitis-vaccine/
http://www.ageofautism.com/2014/08/vaccines-cause-autism.html

Questions have been raised of Vaccines for years, even decades I believe; It's said there's mercury in the vaccines as well. I'm not saying every vaccine is bad.

http://www.healing-arts.org/children/vaccines/vaccines-mercury.htm

Want me to get into fluoride and the EPA says it's bad and banned in every country (except the USA)?
Posted September 10, 2016
avatar
rtcvb32: Want me to get into fluoride and the EPA says it's bad and banned in every country (except the USA)?
Oh, please do, make my day. But don't just post links, I want to hear your opinion.
Posted September 10, 2016
low rated
avatar
rtcvb32: Want me to get into fluoride and the EPA says it's bad and banned in every country (except the USA)?
avatar
DaCostaBR: Oh, please do, make my day. But don't just post links, I want to hear your opinion.
If I turn over a package of toothpaste, it has a warning label not to swallow it, and to contact poison control immediately. I consider it as a poison. You don't label something healthy/useful with 'contact poison control'.
Posted September 10, 2016
low rated
avatar
OneFiercePuppy: I'm not a structural engineer, but I did get into a heated (sorry, had to) argument with one from Carnegie-Mellon when the whole "jet fuel can't melt steel beams" thing came out. The takeaway, laid out in truly daunting detail, was that if you fly a few thousand tons at a few hundred miles an hour into a building, you're going to break the building. And when buildings start falling down in crowded quarters, things get worse.
avatar
viperfdl: Well, the problem in your reasoning is that the two aircrafts crashed in WTC 1 and 2 while no aircraft hit WTC 7.
I'm 30 minutes in, currently watching this video: Architects and Engineers On 9/11 where engineers talk about it from a scientific and engineer point of view. The towers were built to Withstand a 707 crashing into it, something like 1,500 experts on the topic.

edit: Curiously only Controlled Demolitions explains the twin towers and tower 7.

edit: 707, not 747
Post edited September 10, 2016 by rtcvb32
Posted September 10, 2016
low rated
avatar
eksasol: I haven't read anything in this thread, but you know it's bad when you rather listen to Alex Jones than The Young Turks.
The young turks are just as bad but just on the other side of politics.
Posted September 10, 2016
Media, pro left or pro right have their fair share of lies.

Info Wars may get something that turns out to be true like the Hillary E-mail stuff, but many others are just conspiracy that turns out to be false.

In this age where media left and right bullshit us, it is better to stick to articles that turn out to be true instead of sticking with any media. No media is free from lies at worst and click bait exaggeration at best.

If not how they survive without traffic frequenting their media? Truth is often boring.
Posted September 10, 2016
low rated
avatar
Gnostic: If not how they survive without traffic frequenting their media? Truth is often boring.
Actually truth can be stranger than fiction.

avatar
eksasol: but you know it's bad when you rather listen to Alex Jones than The Young Turks.
I don't know, his team seems fairly grounded, I see no deception. Unless something totally stands out as insane that doesn't have a good rational explanation, I'll give him the benefit of the doubt and forward it here. Although their satire bits are a little over the top.

I recall trying to watch TYT and something about when they were talking seemed off. I really don't know.
Posted September 10, 2016
Ok, GOG forum, seriously now- I don't care about my rep one way or the other, but why the hell is it it's the sane people in the thread being downvoted and not the crazy fella? You know, if you think I shouldn't be making fun of this stuff because it might anger our lizardmen overlords, at least have the decency to come out and say it :D
Posted September 10, 2016
low rated
avatar
Breja: Ok, GOG forum, seriously now- I don't care about my rep one way or the other, but why the hell is it it's the sane people in the thread being downvoted and not the crazy fella? You know, if you think I shouldn't be making fun of this stuff because it might anger our lizardmen overlords, at least have the decency to come out and say it :D
ARE YOU SERIOUS? No one will admit it as they are too scared.That's the beauty of this place press red and move on without saying a word.That's the system and tough luck.
And don't be stupid enough to say I never down vote anyone because no one would believe the bullshit.
Post edited September 10, 2016 by Tauto
Posted September 10, 2016
avatar
viperfdl: Well, the problem in your reasoning is that the two aircrafts crashed in WTC 1 and 2 while no aircraft hit WTC 7.
avatar
rtcvb32: I'm 30 minutes in, currently watching this video: Architects and Engineers On 9/11 where engineers talk about it from a scientific and engineer point of view. The towers were built to Withstand a 747 crashing into it, something like 1,500 experts on the topic.
Where is written in the article that the towers could withstand the crash with a 747 Jumbo? In the film it is mentioned that buildings could withstand the crash of a , which is smaller than a [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_747]747.
Posted September 10, 2016
low rated
avatar
rtcvb32: I'm 30 minutes in, currently watching this video: Architects and Engineers On 9/11 where engineers talk about it from a scientific and engineer point of view. The towers were built to Withstand a 747 crashing into it, something like 1,500 experts on the topic.
avatar
viperfdl: Where is written in the article that the towers could withstand the crash with a 747 Jumbo? In the film it is mentioned that buildings could withstand the crash of a , which is smaller than a [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_747]747.
Ack! Stupid typos...
Posted September 10, 2016
low rated
avatar
MaximumBunny: As a general rule, never believe anyone with one sided viewpoints.
Because Ether and Fundamental Transformations and Pigeonhole Skepticism are valid theories that should be seriously considered.
Posted September 10, 2016
avatar
Fenixp: Oh god please, BE TRUE! I want to see a government competent and functional enough to do even half of what conspiracy theorists claim they're doing.
Like the Third Reich or the Soviets?
Posted September 10, 2016
avatar
Spectre: Like the Third Reich or the Soviets?
Third Reich got crushed after like 4 years and Soviet government was hardly functional.
Posted September 10, 2016
Alex Jones gives people brain cancer.
Pages:
1
3
4
5
6
7
25
50
75
100
125
134
This is my favourite topic
Community
General discussionIt is time to pay attention - Infowars(2004 posts) (2004 posts) 
(2004 posts)