Mr. D™: Well for example the author claims that finnland is a gunnut country with a very high gun death rate.
I think Finland has higher than average number of "guns" per capita than many other western countries (actually according to one article only USA and Jemen have more guns per capita than Finland; I'm surprised e.g. Switzerland and Israel have less, I thought all men who have served in the Swiss army have an assault rifle at their home or something), but that is mainly due to hunting in the rural areas. So those "guns" in Finland are for a very big part hunting rifles and shotguns. That (hunting) is even encouraged somewhat, in order to keep e.g. the moose levels at moderate levels (car crashes with moose are the every year happening here).
People living in cities don't quite similarly have access to firearms. You need a permit (from police) to own a gun, and I think in general the only valid reasons for getting one is either hunting, or sports. In both cases you most probably have to be a member of either a hunting club, or a shooting sports club. No guns permitted for self-defense etc.
I guess Finland got press recognition with the two (or was it three, I don't remember anymore) school shootings that happened many years ago by a couple angry young men. After the school shootings the terms to get a license to a gun were tightened further, I think. So, Finland definitely has gun control, but it is not impossible to get hold of a gun permit if you join a hunting or shooting sports club.
I don't actually have data how much gun related deaths there are in Finland, but I don't feel they are that common occurrence. The stereotype is a drunk Finnish man living alone on the countryside shooting himself with his own hunting rifle, probably because he ran out of booze.