Dalthnock: I like this change.
For one, I own American McGee's Grimm & I had thought of making such a suggestion. Having to download 8 GB every time I wanted to play ONE half-hour episode was just ridiculous.
Besides, I may have a solid, if not exactly super-fast internet connection, but internet availability is not equal in all parts of the world. I suspect this will make it easier for a lot of people.
Even if small games like King's Quest are separated, I don't think this will be a problem, 'cuz even if the game is small in size, it may be big in terms of time needed to complete it. It's not exactly a hindrance to download King's Quest I, finish it in a couple of days, maybe a week & then come back to download the second one.
I cannot imagine how this may be a negative choice, really.
mrkgnao: The issue is not whether there should be three installers, one per season. I believe most everybody supports this.
The issue is whether we need three boxes on the shelf, rather than three installers in the one existing box. The unbundling is primarily breaking existing boxes into multiple boxes.
Well, I was dragged into the digital purchasing realm kicking & screaming.
I always went for the big, separate boxes when I really liked something. I guess shelf clutter is something I'm not only used to, but actually enjoy.
I can see how many people will not like that, but for all intents & purposes, not only can I not be bothered over it, I actually *like* it.
The best solution really would be allowing customers to select how they want their collections displayed, but from a business stand-point, I don't think all the extra time & work that necessarily has to go into it, will be feasible.
*shrugs*
After the Telltale debacle - sorry if I'm repeating myself here - I never thought I'd actually support a company's decisions over its customers, but I just can't find GOG changes unreasonable, try as I might.