Treasure: [..]GOG should rather bring back the previous system of 1.5 GB increments[..]
phaolo: To me, asking for small parts for FAT32 on USB sticks seems weird as much as asking for Win98 support..
Size and smallness/bigness is in the eye of the beholder; for me 1.5 GB isn't small-as a matter of fact, it's 2 cd-roms in terms of size!
And I usually don't download stuff at my home as I don't trust my internet connection to be stable enough and download them on a USB stick from other places with more stable internet.Although I should probably just empty my 32 GB USB one of these days and format it to NTFS or something, but that still won't solve the problem that while a big game downloads I'll be worried on whether it'll become corrupted and I'll have to redownload it (this especially with such sizes as the bigger ones they put out recently-2.5 and 3.9 Gbs). Also, my downloading stuff mostly outside of my home (with the exception of files smaller than 300 mbs-that's the most I trust my internet connection for, even though it might be more stable than I feel it is) means I don't usually use the GOG downloader, because I obviously cannot install whatever I want in machines that aren't mine.
Treasure: [..]forcing you to redownload much bigger portions of the installer in case something goes wrong[..]
phaolo: To avoid corruption, GOG should instead:
-1 enable download resuming.
-2 enable file integrity check&repair during downloads.
I agree with this proposal, but then this can only happen with the downloader (and unless I'm mistaken, the first of these can be already done by the downloader), so it doesn't help people who don't use the downloader a whole lot...