Crewdroog: ah. i will see myself out then....
:)
edit: and I do not like the oxford comma unless you really need it. 'and' is the comma!!!!
DieRuhe: When I write book reviews I don't use them because the newspaper doesn't like them, but in everything else I write I do because to me it more closely follows the cadence of speaking.
I just read a good example. Say you're dedicating a book and you write "To my parents, Ayn Rand and God." To me, that's indicating that your parents are Ayn Rand and God. But if you write "To my parents, Ayn Rand, and God" there is no faulty interpretation. Of course, you could reverse the sentence to eliminate the ambiguity and the Oxford - "To Ayn Rand, God and my parents" so a lot of it comes down to how you actually construct sentences.
Seems there are a lot of well-known style guides that are pro-Oxford, but for some reason this often gets overlooked in favor the AP "no Oxford" approach.
:(
i said unless you really need it, i know the examples. I am educated (this is grammar school stuff). lit people and writers are so pretentious. ;) hahahaha (joke, I am one of those people...)
further, the 'and' works as a comma, so the person will pause appropriately. Anyways, do you really pause any differently when you read the two sentences? I don't.
Besides, having a comma after and just looks cluttered. And what if you do believe Ayn Rand and god are your parents? huh? what then? ;) Context is also a big thing here. Your brain is an awesome organ and can figure out what the author meant. No one reading the sentence, "I'd like to thank my parents, Ayn Rand and God" for a minute thought the person meant that those two were his parents. You can't hear commas after 'and' in speech and no one is confused. Soooo, unnecessary! :)
Edit: I love how THIS is our big thing in the writing community. we are so weird. a comma? that's the big debate? lol