It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
https://www.theverge.com/2018/9/12/17850146/microsoft-windows-10-chrome-firefox-warning

Linux would never pull this crap. Windows 7 is the last windows I'd be using.
I use linux because I work with it.

I use linux because I have fun to install new distro.

I don't give a damn a bout linux anymore.
I use Linux because Windows is too expensive.
Microsoft is not using regional pricing for Windows in Russia. This is bad.
I'm not buying games, which are not regionally priced.
And I see no reason to buy Windows, unless it will be regionally priced. :P
avatar
vsr: I use Linux because Windows is too expensive.
Microsoft is not using regional pricing for Windows in Russia. This is bad.
I'm not buying games, which are not regionally priced.
And I see no reason to buy Windows, unless it will be regionally priced. :P
Suppose that Microsoft decides to regionally price Windows in Russia; from now on, Russia would have to pay twice the price the rest of the world pays for Windows. Would that get you to buy Windows?
avatar
vsr: I use Linux because Windows is too expensive.
Microsoft is not using regional pricing for Windows in Russia. This is bad.
I'm not buying games, which are not regionally priced.
And I see no reason to buy Windows, unless it will be regionally priced. :P
avatar
dtgreene: Suppose that Microsoft decides to regionally price Windows in Russia; from now on, Russia would have to pay twice the price the rest of the world pays for Windows. Would that get you to buy Windows?
Why should it be twice the price? The whole point and purpose of regional pricing is that it compensates for economic circumstances. Games on GOG are usually the cheapest in Russia.
avatar
vsr: I use Linux because Windows is too expensive.
Microsoft is not using regional pricing for Windows in Russia. This is bad.
I'm not buying games, which are not regionally priced.
And I see no reason to buy Windows, unless it will be regionally priced. :P
avatar
dtgreene: Suppose that Microsoft decides to regionally price Windows in Russia; from now on, Russia would have to pay twice the price the rest of the world pays for Windows. Would that get you to buy Windows?
Yes!

edit: forum has eaten facepalm emoji. -_-
Post edited September 13, 2018 by vsr
low rated
avatar
Jeffry84: I don't know much about systemd and I keep wondering what this hate is all about. I guess it's because it's too Linux dependent to be as universal as other init systems, but that's all.
avatar
Palestine: Typically, the disdain for 'systemd' stems from its ever-growing feature set (feature creep), as it attempts to integrate various functions of other programs (this is outside of the scope of what PID 1 is traditionally meant to achieve). Unintentional, or otherwise, this can have a widespread, detrimental impact upon other projects, as systemd has become the default initialization system on several commonly-used distributions of Linux.

Thankfully, since 'udev' was usurped by systemd, Gentoo forked udev (with the name of 'eudev'). In the coming months, after a substantial trial period in a production environment, I will most-likely be replacing Gentoo's eudev with 'smdev' (coupled with 'nldev') on the systems that I administrate.

Personally, I have settled on 'sinit' as the best minimalistic initialization system (which only requires 3 files in total: the manually-compiled sinit binary, an init script, and a shutdown/reboot script). On old and new computers alike, the stability has been rock-solid, user-initiated start-ups/restarts/shutdowns have never been quicker, all of which is probably related to its inherent simplicity. This comes after using SysVinit for years, and using OpenRC for over one year.
This post is EXACTLY why Linux will NEVER win the Desktop, or get Windows users over to Linux. I have no f*cking idea what the hell you said in that post, no idea whatsoever. And I'm a Windows PC engineer, I build and install Windows systems. Now ask someone like my 78 year-old neighbour if he understood any of that shite, and he would think you've lost your mind. Stop and ask anyone in the street, and apart from 1 or 2 Linux nerds, you might get a punch in the face from people who think you are taking the piss.

Seriously Linux nerds, step outside your little nerd bubble, just for a few minutes, and see yourselves. You really have no f*cking idea about the average person. I do, I deal with them every day of the week. And I'm telling you this, they will NEVER be able to install, then maintain a Linux system. Let alone, goto a high-street store, buy a off-the-shelf printer, or whatever device, go home and get the thing working on Linux. Even on Windows, they do struggle, but they can at the very least understand the basics because it's pretty standard across Windows systems.

I tried a Linux distro, back in the spring, on my I7 8700k, Z370 Asus Motherboard, Nvidia GTX 1080, 16 Gb Ram, and all I got was a black screen and a cursor, nothing else. Thankfully, this was a bootable disk, so I didn't risk my Windows 10 install. But imagine a average user trying this and getting the same, what would they do ? At least with windows, they get a desktop, and 99% of the time their internet will work. So they have something to start from.

I can give my 75 year-old dad a Windows 10 USB Stick and he will have a working system in the time it takes to install. Why ? Because it's pretty damn easy to just insert a USB stick and in a couple of hours he will have, at the very least, a working desktop with internet access. Can you say the same with a Linux Distro ? No, you can't. And until this changes, this will always be like this.

If I wiped Windows 10, installed Linux and got the damn thing to work with ALL my hardware, I would lose nearly 85% of my entire games library. I mean, we don't need to do the maths here, all we need to do is ask, WHY ? Why would I do that ? As much as you slag off Win 10, it's a pretty-damn decent OS, despite what some here say. You have complete freedom, despite what some here say. You can customise to your hearts content, and even switch off all the telemetry - even if you have to use registry hacks, or Group Policy Editor hacks.

It's almost week after week, on this forum, that we see these silly Linux willy-waving threads. You lot treat Linux like a freaking religion, or worse, a cult. You are nuts.
The Windows OS is crap, Microsoft are evil, posts are getting boring. It's like the XP days, then the Vista days, now the Windows 10 days. It never changes. The same piss-poor arguments, made by the same pro-Linux idiots.
I expect this to be down-voted to hell. But hey, I don't care. ALL my games work as they should. All my emulators work as they should - You have CEMU yet ? What was that ? No ? Oh dear.
avatar
Palestine: Typically, the disdain for 'systemd' stems from its ever-growing feature set (feature creep), as it attempts to integrate various functions of other programs (this is outside of the scope of what PID 1 is traditionally meant to achieve). Unintentional, or otherwise, this can have a widespread, detrimental impact upon other projects, as systemd has become the default initialization system on several commonly-used distributions of Linux.

Thankfully, since 'udev' was usurped by systemd, Gentoo forked udev (with the name of 'eudev'). In the coming months, after a substantial trial period in a production environment, I will most-likely be replacing Gentoo's eudev with 'smdev' (coupled with 'nldev') on the systems that I administrate.

Personally, I have settled on 'sinit' as the best minimalistic initialization system (which only requires 3 files in total: the manually-compiled sinit binary, an init script, and a shutdown/reboot script). On old and new computers alike, the stability has been rock-solid, user-initiated start-ups/restarts/shutdowns have never been quicker, all of which is probably related to its inherent simplicity. This comes after using SysVinit for years, and using OpenRC for over one year.
avatar
CraigGen_1970: This post is EXACTLY why Linux will NEVER win the Desktop, or get Windows users over to Linux. I have no f*cking idea what the hell you said in that post, no idea whatsoever. And I'm a Windows PC engineer, I build and install Windows systems. Now ask someone like my 78 year-old neighbour if he understood any of that shite, and he would think you've lost your mind. Stop and ask anyone in the street, and apart from 1 or 2 Linux nerds, you might get a punch in the face from people who think you are taking the piss.
If you are not at the point where you understand Linux init systems and what's good/bad about systemd, you can just ignore the whole issue and just go with whatever the distro installs by default. The default (which tends to be "systemd") works well enough for it to be a default, so you should be fine if you stick to it; it's only advanced users who take the time to learn about such things, or those building their own distros, who need to worry about that sort of thing.

Do *you* know, off hand, how the Windows init system works?
avatar
CraigGen_1970: This post is EXACTLY why Linux will NEVER win the Desktop, or get Windows users over to Linux. I have no f*cking idea what the hell you said in that post, no idea whatsoever. And I'm a Windows PC engineer, I build and install Windows systems. Now ask someone like my 78 year-old neighbour if he understood any of that shite, and he would think you've lost your mind. Stop and ask anyone in the street, and apart from 1 or 2 Linux nerds, you might get a punch in the face from people who think you are taking the piss.
avatar
dtgreene: If you are not at the point where you understand Linux init systems and what's good/bad about systemd, you can just ignore the whole issue and just go with whatever the distro installs by default. The default (which tends to be "systemd") works well enough for it to be a default, so you should be fine if you stick to it; it's only advanced users who take the time to learn about such things, or those building their own distros, who need to worry about that sort of thing.

Do *you* know, off hand, how the Windows init system works?
Yup people seem to have a problem with the fact that Linux accommodates everybody. And I've encountered situations where Windows simply doesn't work from a default install because Microsoft is too slow to update it so you have to move and learn how to use a new version.
low rated

Do *you* know, off hand, how the Windows init system works?
Yes, I do.
There are a few connected managers such as Session Manager, Service Control Manager, Logon Manager, all perform a few functions associated with the init system.But this isn't my point. You would hardly see this type of conversation among Windows users, most would and do talk "Normally".
My point was, you Linux users talk in a whole completely different language, and these "Normal" users, the ones you want to "Convert", will NEVER understand you.
My neighbour, my Dad, the Average Guy/Girl, would NEVER get to a stage where they can install and maintain a Linux distro. And you are kidding yourselves if you think they will.

Until you lower yourselves to the ones who simply have no idea, until you drop the arrogance, you will never see a mass convert to Linux. Millions are happy with Windows, so leave them alone.
Post edited September 13, 2018 by CraigGen_1970
avatar
CraigGen_1970: My point was, you Linux users talk in a whole completely different language, and these "Normal" users, the ones you want to "Convert", will NEVER understand you.
My neighbour, my Dad, the Average Guy/Girl, would NEVER get to a stage where they can install and maintain a Linux distro. And you are kidding yourselves if you think they will.
Not all Linux users talk like that. They might be a bit more tech-savvy on average (at least they are aware that other operating systems exist and therefore probably did some research) so this might skew your impression a little. You really don't need to know anything of this to use it.

And really: installing Linux is no daunting task at all. The most difficult part in my case was to figure out how to create a bootable USB drive in Windows (hint: it wasn't difficult at all). After that I tested the live system (everything worked) installed it (everything worked) and just used it (everything still works). This was actually a much smoother experience than installing and configuring windows...

It might not be that smooth with every distribution on every machine with every hardware setup, but you can test it for free, so no worries...
low rated
hmcpretender, exactly the same could be said about Windows 7 and Windows 10. They're a breeze to install, as long as you follow the steps every way.
Installing a Videocard, Printer, Joystick,etc..... pop the disk in, or goto the website and download the drivers, install, and there you go - a fully working printer, videocard, or joystick.
Those making out it's hard, or painful, are just liars.

If you're happy with Linux, great. But don't try and mass-convert people from Windows to Linux just to suit your agenda.
This isn't Windows ME, or XP, anymore. Today, Windows is incredibly stable and mature, and it's very rare to get a crash because of Windows.
To me personally, of the few modern distros I have tried on company systems, I found them incredibly dull, ugly, and uninspiring. They always felt like a OS that wasn't ready for a home user, or a gamer, and perfectly belonged in the corporate sector.
I would LOVE to use Linux. I have tried Ubuntu and Mint again and again and I love the way they work! I don't even need windows for my job because Linux has become more than enough for professional stuff. The only reason I still have windows are the following games:

Star Wars The Old Republic
Mass Effect Andromeda
Mass Effect 3
Dragon Age Inquisition


I can't dual boot because my SSD is only 120 GBytes and whenever I try to read a guide about WINE I get confused. If someone knows a way for those games to work on Ubuntu or Mint, I will gladly install Linux once again, with a bigger smile on my face this time!
avatar
CraigGen_1970: If you're happy with Linux, great. But don't try and mass-convert people from Windows to Linux just to suit your agenda.
Sorry if I came across like that. In my opinion everyone should use whatever is best suited for his needs. I consider Windows 7 as an excellent operating system, and was very happy with XP as well back in the day. But while almost everybody has first hand windows experiences, Linux still seems to be surrounded by a lot of superstition. I encourage everyone to give it a try. You already did, you didn't like it. That's ok.
I ve used, and using, Linux by so many years, but still don t understand this anti MS sentiment.

Windows 10 is a great system, and retro compatibility is generally good.
Try to run any application on a 10 years old Linux.
Not even in a bad joke.