OldFatGuy: But I choose OLDEST FIRST to sort by, and lo and behold one of the first games listed, IN THE VERY FIRST ROW, is Cyberpunk 2077. I circled the number of games just to point our that there is no way on this green earth that Cyberpunk 2077 is anywhere near the oldest, neither in terms of the game itself (which would be when it was released right?) nor in terms of when I purchased it. In fact, though I'm not 100% certain of this, in terms of release date Cyberpunk 2077 may be, and likely is, the NEWEST game I own and thus should be absolutely last, on the very last page, not the first.
FrostburnPhoenix: https://www.gogdb.org/product/1423049311#details It doesn't have a release date internally. Although the
package https://www.gogdb.org/product/2093619782 does.
Exactly, GOG has used the flawed and unhealthy idea of packages from the beginning, which introduced this and many, many other bugs:
- Games that are updated that are part of a package aren't flagged in the library as updated and the blue dot doesn't appear.
- All games within a package almost never have complete data, so it's impossible to sort or filter them within the library. GOG can add the data upon request to support, but it seems to be a very complicated task.
- Packages introduced the age-old problem of purchased games not being marked as owned by the store when there are multiple versions of the same game.
This would all be fixable by eliminating these unnecessary packages and implementing a Steam-like system with reconfigurable bundles, but it would require disrupting the dated system that uses the store, and I dread to imagine the bugs and problems that would arise.