Spectre: Why should users or key resellers foot the bill for thefts. It encourages crime and makes card users complacent.
SJW is the wrong word here. Anti consumer is the correct one.
misteryo: On G2A, thieves use stolen credit cards to buy digital games. Then they sell these stolen goods. If you buy on G2A, you could be buying stolen goods. Stolen digital goods can get revoked, same as stolen physical goods can be recovered. You buy stolen goods from a thief, you have no rights against having those goods recovered from you.
That is not an anti-consumer stance. That is a pro-consumer stance. Protecting the rights of property is pro-consumer.
They aren't protecting the consumer and they aren't stolen goods. It encourages fraud and poor security.
The game is not stolen. It is property purchased through the use of fraud. It is like a conman taking money then buying an item then selling that item. The conman is the criminal and if police action is to be taken then it is against them.
This is the same as someone using a stolen card to buy a game code then selling it. The games publishers selling the key revoke it because they can not because it's right or depending on your area,lawful.
Businesses don't like customers benefiting from globalisation so they may misuse this system.
A person selling stolen items is different and if items are to be reclaimed then it is through the police and courts.