Ghorpm: Oookkkaaaayyy... why would they put AoW 2, which is considered to be the worst in the series, in second tier while AoW1 and AoW:SM are in the first one? Judging by the recent Hammerwatch idiocy I think that perhaps somebody thought that SM must be an expansion for AoW1 and AoW2 is obviously newer than those two and hence it ended up in the second tier. Seriously, I really think it's entirely possible ;D
EDIT: BTW, this bundle is really nice but I already own every single game from it :)
Trid: So, If I never had experiance with AoW with one I should pick, SM?
You have asked an extremely biased person ;) AoW 1 is my favorite game ever so I obviously prefer this over 2 and SM. But there are different opinions too, although I don't remember anyone preferring AoW2. Not that it's a bad game, far from that actually. It's just SM polishes and expands everything from AoW2 while AoW is significantly different. Main differences:
- battles are longer because of "positioning phase" (both armies start far away from each other) but personally I love this option because you can use it to your tactical advantage.
- Your hero takes part in battles (and it's game over when he/she dies) while in AoW2/SM he/she should be always in a wizard's tower. And as long as you still have at least one tower he/she is basically immortal because he/she will respawn in wizard's tower after getting killed.
Damn... I don't really know what to write... AoW1 and SM are both awesome games (AoW 2 is "only" very good") and it's a matter of personal taste... it would be safer to get them both ;)