It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Vote no because accidentally voting in something good but not important enough to conduct a legit referendum on isn't worth the risk of accidentally voting in something bad.
avatar
Hunter65536: Only heartless monsters would choose to fight 100 duck-sized horses so nothing to choose there. :P
avatar
Bookwyrm627: I'm definitely a heartless monster, then. I do not want to get in a fight with a horse sized duck, but I'm generally not afraid of anything I can punt, and horses are pretty fragile when you get past their (normal) size.
I'd definitely get into a fight with a horse sized duck if it means protecting those 100 duck sized horses. What you said is like Darth Vader killing kid jedis instead of defeating someone on Jedi council. (Empire awakens or some such) :P
avatar
Hunter65536: I'd definitely get into a fight with a horse sized duck if it means protecting those 100 duck sized horses. What you said is like Darth Vader killing kid jedis instead of defeating someone on Jedi council. (Empire awakens or some such) :P
I'd generally rather be on the "Vader killing kid jedis" side of the power scale than playing the part of "Owen Lars versus Vader". Standard me versus horse sized duck would probably be a curb-stomp battle, and I'm not so fond of tiny horses that I'd want to take that beating for them.

Depending on weapons or other equipment available, the answer might change of course.
I've had this situation happen, where I wasn't aware ahead of time a particular question would be on a ballot.

"Shall the Constitution of {...} be amended so as to abolish the existing Judicial Qualifications Commission; require the General Assembly to create and provide by general law for the composition, manner of appointment, and governance of a new Judicial Qualifications Commission, with such commission having the power to discipline, remove, and cause involuntary retirement of judges; require the Judicial Qualifications Commission to have procedures that provide for due process of law and review by the Supreme Court of its advisory opinions; and allow the Judicial Qualifications Commission to be open to the public in some manner?"

I wasn't sure how many of these powers were already granted to the existing commission, or precisely why there was agitation for change. Although I figured it was probably to make it easier to boot problem judges, I felt I didn't have enough information (i.e., if the new version was being proposed primarily as a witch-hunt against a specific judge) to pick a side.

I abstained.
avatar
Bookwyrm627: I'm definitely a heartless monster, then. I do not want to get in a fight with a horse sized duck, but I'm generally not afraid of anything I can punt, and horses are pretty fragile when you get past their (normal) size.
avatar
Hunter65536: I'd definitely get into a fight with a horse sized duck if it means protecting those 100 duck sized horses. What you said is like Darth Vader killing kid jedis instead of defeating someone on Jedi council. (Empire awakens or some such) :P
Nobody ever said you had to kill the 100 duck-sized horses or the horse-sized duck, just fight them to a standstill at the least.
@bookwyrm but duck sized horses are considerably cuter though.
avatar
Hunter65536: I'd definitely get into a fight with a horse sized duck if it means protecting those 100 duck sized horses. What you said is like Darth Vader killing kid jedis instead of defeating someone on Jedi council. (Empire awakens or some such) :P
avatar
zeogold: Nobody ever said you had to kill the 100 duck-sized horses or the horse-sized duck, just fight them to a standstill at the least.
If you ain't fighting to kill, you ain't fighting at all.
avatar
Hunter65536: If you ain't fighting to kill, you ain't fighting at all.
You fight, but you fight without honor. I'd say you fight like a cow, but those are some pretty mean suckers too.
Did you mean Refeyendum?
avatar
Hunter65536: If you ain't fighting to kill, you ain't fighting at all.
avatar
zeogold: You fight, but you fight without honor. I'd say you fight like a cow, but those are some pretty mean suckers too.
"...call it the art of fighting, without fighting."
But on the topic now! I would do as I do on all elections in my country and for EU Parliament; draw a very big, huge, gigantic drawing of Phallus and by doing that make my ballot invalid!

Because you don't really vote; you just think you have a choice, but in reality Head Lizard from Reptilian Lair decides! ;-)
Post edited February 22, 2017 by GlorFindel
avatar
Hunter65536: If you ain't fighting to kill, you ain't fighting at all.
avatar
zeogold: You fight, but you fight without honor. I'd say you fight like a cow, but those are some pretty mean suckers too.
Don't you dare say anything about cow, they're holy to me :P

@dtgreene Sorry for derailing your topic bro, I'll be out now.
low rated
avatar
Hunter65536: @dtgreene Sorry for derailing your topic bro, I'll be out now.
Please don't call me "bro"; I'm not a guy.
avatar
Hunter65536: @dtgreene Sorry for derailing your topic bro, I'll be out now.
avatar
dtgreene: Please don't call me "bro"; I'm not a guy.
Okay sis, I'll leave this thread alone now since we don't have referendums ever anyway.
avatar
Hunter65536: @bookwyrm but duck sized horses are considerably cuter though.
At last, something we can agree on! :D
avatar
Hunter65536: Don't you dare say anything about cow, they're holy to me :P
At last I get to use this again.