paladin181: You don't care about splitting hairs (it's not) because it doesn't fit your argument. "Someone told me I'm wrong, and demonstrated the point. I know, I'll ignore it and claim it as semantics!!"
Breja: You didn't demonstrate anything You said "And if the intended purpose was to harm your system you'd be right.the "mal-" in malware means malice, or mal intent".
To which I responded that GOG's underhanded way of spreading a potentialy harmful software, in my opinion, is "malicious".
And apparently you do agree that what GOG is doing with Galaxy installers is wrong, so we really are arguing nothing but the applicability of the word "malicious". So yes, this is semantics.
Sure. I can get behind that. I really don't care all that much. The program itself is fine in my opinion. I just hate the way they propagated it.
As for BK's insistence that the numbers were rising, its likely that they weren't rising fast enough. When you have to meet quarterly projections you'll do everything you can to make it.