XYCat: It seems to lack any kind of humour or hyperboles so it might probably be just crap about violence for the sake of violence.
fronzelneekburm: So? If there's one thing about this game I appreciate, it's the complete lack of wink-at-the-camera shit. Why is there this common consensous that all media violence has to be delivered in an oh-so-funneeh, watered-down, Tarantinoesque fashion? Why not show violence the way it is: gruesome and nasty. After all, it's just pixels. So what's the problem with violence for the sake of violence?
Ghostbreed: What was/is so "funny & great" about Postal then?
fronzelneekburm: Waiting in line at the supermarket.
I'm not even joking, I thought that was subversive genius.
You don't need a whole game for that. You see everything the game has to offer in like five minutes since there's no other content than the violence for the sake of violence content. With no plot or jokes there's no reason to spend time watching the same execution animations and listening to the same screams over and over. Unless you're a psychopath.
Even the most gruesome exploitation movies have some kind of plot or jokes. But this game already stated in its trailer that it's going to have none of it.