It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
SpooferJahk: Hatred on the other hand... if this trailer is anything to go by, seems like it is taking that descent into madness concept, and amplifying the over-the-topness to cringe-worthy degrees. Something about it just doesn't feel right to me, I am not some prude that hates on violent video games, but this just feels like more of violence for violence's sake instead of having a game that takes you on a trip of insane violence. Maybe things might improve when it comes out but my initial impression of the game just shows me a game that is trying a bit too hard.
I had exactly the same impression.

They should be allowed to make it for the sake of freedom, but they won't get any support from me.

@Everyone that doesn't have a Google+/Youtube account, you can see the trailer and gameplay footage here:
https://duckduckgo.com/l/?kh=-1&uddg=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hatredgame.com%2F
Post edited October 20, 2014 by Klumpen0815
avatar
Rohan15: This game is iffy for me.
On one hand, part of me wants to experience this and see if the game leads to any interesting philosophical questions about violence and self-worth. On the other hand, the gruesomeness is almost too much for me (I projectile vomited a tad bit during my play through of Spec Ops: The Line) and I consider myself desensitized by violence in general. If the game is really just a violent shoot-em up, I more than likely wont bother playing it. However, if the game does end up having some deeper meaning, I'll give it a shot.
Oh, and the whole censorship drama going on...It's a game. Who cares who sells it?
I hear you about maybe possibly giving a damn if the game turns out to have some kind of deeper meaning. Sadly, the developer's comments thus far don't lead to much hope on that front:

"These days, when a lot of games are heading to be polite, colorful, politically correct, and trying to be some kind of higher art, rather than just an entertainment--we wanted to create something against trends," the studio said about Hatred.

Not exactly sure how they can expect people to expect some kind of deeper meaning when they are tired of games trying to have one.
Post edited October 20, 2014 by Jonesy89
Moved this from the giveaway thred. Might as well keep things collected. It is in response to the large monkey.
http://www.gog.com/forum/general/vote_for_hatred_on_the_wishlist_giveaway/post60

I did not try to express that I think if people have the freedom to do bad things, they will do it and this is bad. I don't see how you got that from my post.
"If there were no laws tomorrow, people would have the freedom to buy guns and murder innocent people for fun. Do you think it would be right for people to make use of that freedom? "

If you have the freedom to do something, it doesn't mean you should do that something. If the store has the freedom to not sell a game and be hostile
Refusing to sell something and being hostile is two very different things....

towards innocent people
I have asked you a few times who these 'innocent people' are....

and they make use of that freedom to not sell the game and be hostile towards innocent people. Guess what? The store is still behaving badly
If indeed a store is 'hostile' towards 'innocent people', then yes they are bad. However, here this do not happen, as the stores are not hostile (prove this), nor are the developers innocent (as they knowingly are making a controversial game)

because they have no good reason to not sell the game
They do - it is a disgusting and controversial game. No one should ever be forced to sell something they do not like against their will... and you are talking about peoples freedom?

and be hostile towards innocent people.
again.... you are a rhetorical analyst's wet dream. Saying something over and over do not make it true.

I tried to communicate this to you. Having the freedom to do something is not a good reason to do something.
Indeed, as is the freedom to sell something does not mean it is a good reason to do so. You can choose not to do so if you do not like the product or what it stands for.

I meant to say this.

If there were no laws tomorrow, people would have the freedom to buy guns and murder innocent people for fun. Do you think it would be right for people to make use of that freedom to murder innocent people for fun? < - Bad analogy? Maybe but it does a good job at pointing out that having the freedom to do something doesn't make it acceptable to do that something. So I used it. Big deal.
It is a rubbish analogy which do not say anything, except muddling the waters further then they where before. If you need to retort to analogies like this, you know you are on thin ice. I do not need any, as I am quite sure on my position

How about you stop attacking my analogy and start defending your position unless of course, you can't anymore...
indeed.

(sorry for the late reply, the forum ate my first post and I had to redo it)
avatar
Rohan15: This game is iffy for me.
On one hand, part of me wants to experience this and see if the game leads to any interesting philosophical questions about violence and self-worth. On the other hand, the gruesomeness is almost too much for me (I projectile vomited a tad bit during my play through of Spec Ops: The Line) and I consider myself desensitized by violence in general. If the game is really just a violent shoot-em up, I more than likely wont bother playing it. However, if the game does end up having some deeper meaning, I'll give it a shot.
Oh, and the whole censorship drama going on...It's a game. Who cares who sells it?
avatar
Jonesy89: I hear you about maybe possibly giving a damn if the game turns out to have some kind of deeper meaning. Sadly, the developer's comments thus far don't lead to much hope on that front:

"These days, when a lot of games are heading to be polite, colorful, politically correct, and trying to be some kind of higher art, rather than just an entertainment--we wanted to create something against trends," the studio said about Hatred.

Not exactly sure how they can expect people to expect some kind of deeper meaning when they are tired of games trying to have one.
That's not the whole quote

The question you may ask is: why do they do this? These days, when a lot of games are heading to be polite, colorful, politically correct and trying to be some kind of higher art, rather than just an entertainment – we wanted to create something against trends. Something different, something that could give the player a pure, gaming pleasure. Herecomes our game, which takes no prisoners and makes no excuses. We say ‘yes, it is a game about killing people’ and the only reason of the antagonist doing that sick stuff is his deep-rooted hatred. Player has to ask himself what can push any human being to mass-murder. We provoke this question using new Unreal Engine 4

There is a meaning. It's about Sadism.
This is basically the video game version of Cannibal Holocaust.
avatar
Jonesy89: I hear you about maybe possibly giving a damn if the game turns out to have some kind of deeper meaning. Sadly, the developer's comments thus far don't lead to much hope on that front:

"These days, when a lot of games are heading to be polite, colorful, politically correct, and trying to be some kind of higher art, rather than just an entertainment--we wanted to create something against trends," the studio said about Hatred.

Not exactly sure how they can expect people to expect some kind of deeper meaning when they are tired of games trying to have one.
avatar
CthuluIsSpy: That's not the whole quote

The question you may ask is: why do they do this? These days, when a lot of games are heading to be polite, colorful, politically correct and trying to be some kind of higher art, rather than just an entertainment – we wanted to create something against trends. Something different, something that could give the player a pure, gaming pleasure. Herecomes our game, which takes no prisoners and makes no excuses. We say ‘yes, it is a game about killing people’ and the only reason of the antagonist doing that sick stuff is his deep-rooted hatred. Player has to ask himself what can push any human being to mass-murder. We provoke this question using new Unreal Engine 4

There is a meaning. It's about Sadism.
This is basically the video game version of Cannibal Holocaust.
So they are tired of games trying to have a higher meaning, so they made a game that was mean to be entertainment, *but* they also wanted to make it a game that makes the player ask questions. So they want to both shun the tendency toward higher meanings and yet are also claiming that their game has a higher meaning. This smacks of having one's cake and trying to eat it. Either it's just entertainment meant to rebut a perceived trend toward games being treated like higher art, or they are trying to make something that has the aspirations of higher art. Frankly, the whole "player has to ask" nonsense seems like something that they pulled out of their ass so that they could try to justify the violence with some artistic aspiration, the same artistic aspirations they sought to buck.

"Man, fuck modern trends toward PC and artsy-fartsy games! This is some pure entertainment that will blow your motherfucking mind! Oh, and lest anyone call this exploitative and tasteless, it also serves as an interactive fiction statement about sadism *tweaks monacle while extending the pinky*."
low rated
I want that game and I will buy it wherever it is available. If some hippys pee their pants because there is a game that is everything against their moral compass the better for me. And ungh canibal holocaust was realy disgusting with that animal cruelty... that was REAL...the rest was fake but still hit a nerve back then!

But we are talking about pixels. Games might look somewhat realistic today.... still PIXELS!

And it shows me again that eastern european devs. arent that brainwashed yet with this hippy nonsense. I hope more devs just crush all the hippy influence and do offensive stuff again. I dont mind it!
Maybe they wanted to tell the hippys just F*** you and cry me some river. We dont give a damn about you hippys! They dont like to make the happy hippys happy :D


AND if it is moddable to some degree... i know what kind of new skins I will do... gamergate haters gave me a lot of variety of ideas to start with!
Post edited October 21, 2014 by NWN_babayaga
low rated
avatar
amok: Moved this from the giveaway thred. Might as well keep things collected. It is in response to the large monkey.
http://www.gog.com/forum/general/vote_for_hatred_on_the_wishlist_giveaway/post60

I did not try to express that I think if people have the freedom to do bad things, they will do it and this is bad. I don't see how you got that from my post.
avatar
amok: "If there were no laws tomorrow, people would have the freedom to buy guns and murder innocent people for fun. Do you think it would be right for people to make use of that freedom? "

If you have the freedom to do something, it doesn't mean you should do that something. If the store has the freedom to not sell a game and be hostile
avatar
amok: Refusing to sell something and being hostile is two very different things....

towards innocent people
avatar
amok: I have asked you a few times who these 'innocent people' are....

and they make use of that freedom to not sell the game and be hostile towards innocent people. Guess what? The store is still behaving badly
avatar
amok: If indeed a store is 'hostile' towards 'innocent people', then yes they are bad. However, here this do not happen, as the stores are not hostile (prove this), nor are the developers innocent (as they knowingly are making a controversial game)

because they have no good reason to not sell the game
avatar
amok: They do - it is a disgusting and controversial game. No one should ever be forced to sell something they do not like against their will... and you are talking about peoples freedom?

and be hostile towards innocent people.
avatar
amok: again.... you are a rhetorical analyst's wet dream. Saying something over and over do not make it true.

I tried to communicate this to you. Having the freedom to do something is not a good reason to do something.
avatar
amok: Indeed, as is the freedom to sell something does not mean it is a good reason to do so. You can choose not to do so if you do not like the product or what it stands for.

I meant to say this.

If there were no laws tomorrow, people would have the freedom to buy guns and murder innocent people for fun. Do you think it would be right for people to make use of that freedom to murder innocent people for fun? < - Bad analogy? Maybe but it does a good job at pointing out that having the freedom to do something doesn't make it acceptable to do that something. So I used it. Big deal.
avatar
amok: It is a rubbish analogy which do not say anything, except muddling the waters further then they where before. If you need to retort to analogies like this, you know you are on thin ice. I do not need any, as I am quite sure on my position

How about you stop attacking my analogy and start defending your position unless of course, you can't anymore...
avatar
amok: indeed.

(sorry for the late reply, the forum ate my first post and I had to redo it)
"Refusing to sell something and being hostile is two very different things.... " = WRONG
Read here and you will see what "hostile" means. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/hostile?s=t

Refusing to sell something to people for no good reason is being hostile. And trying to pressure GOG into not selling Hatred is no different. Hostile? How? If GOG doesn't sell the game then a lot of people A) wont be able to play the game because they have zero tolerance for DRM or B) be forced to buy the Steam version which is inferior in every way compared to a GOG. Both A) and B) = denying innocent people some happiness and money(for the developers and the publisher). Both A) and B) = being hostile to innocent people. I will explain why they are innocent further down the post.

The innocent people are the developers who are making this game, the people who working as their publishers and the people who want a GOG version of this game. And being part of a controversial game is not immoral or a crime... And neither is playing and enjoying such a game. So if someone is not guilty of anything immoral or illegal then that person is innocent. Don't believe me? Look here http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/innocent?s=t

"Indeed, as is the freedom to sell something does not mean it is a good reason to do so. You can choose not to do so if you do not like the product or what it stands for."
If a store chooses not sell Hatred because the store doesn't like Hatred and the store doesn't like what Hatred stands for then the store is being hostile towards an innocent group of people for no good reason and that is wrong.

I'm not on thin ice. LOL Not even close. My analogy might be bad but in no way did it muddle the waters. If it muddled your waters, then that is your problem.
Post edited October 21, 2014 by monkeydelarge
low rated
Who had the silly idea to preasure gog to not sell hatred game ? Can someone give me a link please to these idiots !
And ey, depression quest is way more disturbing then hatred game!
Post edited October 21, 2014 by NWN_babayaga
low rated
avatar
NWN_babayaga: Who had the silly idea to preasure gog to not sell hatred game ? Can someone give me a link please to these idiots !
And ey, depression quest is way more disturbing then hatred game!
http://www.gog.com/wishlist/games/no_for_hatred_on_gog
avatar
CthuluIsSpy: There is a meaning. It's about Sadism.
I thought it was about sheer and utter hatred? Sadism doesn't need to be involved. The protagonist doesn't necessarily get any pleasure of it but merely does it as an outlet of his hatred. I find sadism more disturbing but also more interesting as a theme for a game than hatred but hatred is good too.
Post edited October 21, 2014 by Nirth
low rated
avatar
NWN_babayaga: Who had the silly idea to preasure gog to not sell hatred game ? Can someone give me a link please to these idiots !
And ey, depression quest is way more disturbing then hatred game!
avatar
monkeydelarge: http://www.gog.com/wishlist/games/no_for_hatred_on_gog
thanks!
avatar
NWN_babayaga: Who had the silly idea to preasure gog to not sell hatred game ? Can someone give me a link please to these idiots !
And ey, depression quest is way more disturbing then hatred game!
Depression is a serious thing that I suffer from - I could not stand that game (Depression Quest).

As for the link to do not distribute hatred on GOG.com - Here you go - You can thank Yumlick for this. He is advocating for Censorship BTW.

http://www.gog.com/wishlist/games/no_for_hatred_on_gog

We the users of GOG who want this game on GOG have more than double votes of the Say no to hatred.

http://www.gog.com/wishlist/games/hatred


Also for you SJWs

It is only game why you heff to be mad?
Post edited October 21, 2014 by HeadClot
low rated
avatar
NWN_babayaga: Who had the silly idea to preasure gog to not sell hatred game ? Can someone give me a link please to these idiots !
And ey, depression quest is way more disturbing then hatred game!
avatar
HeadClot: Depression is a serious thing that I suffer from - I could not stand that game (Depression Quest).

As for the link to do not distribute hatred on GOG.com - Here you go - You can thank Yumlick for this. He is advocating for Censorship BTW.

http://www.gog.com/wishlist/games/no_for_hatred_on_gog
I think i had a few depressions too. I´m not sure and it´s not a topic i want to bring into public forums. But yeah, many people who actually suffer from depression right now also said that the "game" is not ... I didnt even understood what the point was. Anyway good luck to you ;)

And that censorship stuff is realy offensive to me. People actually lived in socialism or "communism" before the fall of the soviet union. IT´s just not right!
avatar
HeadClot: Depression is a serious thing that I suffer from - I could not stand that game (Depression Quest).

As for the link to do not distribute hatred on GOG.com - Here you go - You can thank Yumlick for this. He is advocating for Censorship BTW.

http://www.gog.com/wishlist/games/no_for_hatred_on_gog
avatar
NWN_babayaga: I think i had a few depressions too. I´m not sure and it´s not a topic i want to bring into public forums. But yeah, many people who actually suffer from depression right now also said that the "game" is not ... I didnt even understood what the point was. Anyway good luck to you ;)

And that censorship stuff is realy offensive to me. People actually lived in socialism or "communism" before the fall of the soviet union. IT´s just not right!
I agree - It is not right both censorship and Agenda pushers are bad for everyone.

We are having a problem with Agenda pushers here in the united states. But that is for another thread. :)
I fear that this game will run like shit on my laptop.

From the Hatred website...
"We provoke this question using new Unreal Engine 4, pushing its physics (or rather PhysX) systems to the limits and trying to make the visuals as good as possible."

PhysX is a hungry fucking beast...


If I don't get at least 30 fps non stop, then there will be Hatred, indeed. Hatred towards my laptop...
Post edited October 21, 2014 by monkeydelarge