That comment wasn't aimed at you. But in any case, it's more of the radicalism and cult mentality: if I'm not a feminist then I'm certainly a strict conservative religious nut, if I'm not extreme leftist then I'm extreme right, etc.

I know and even if it was I don't care. :P I love everyone so long as they treat me in the same sarcastic jovial the void of all serious manner in which I treat them, regardless of who they are, where they stand, or what they believe in.

Except for Cubs fans. Fuck em all and I say we nuke Wrigley.

Who called you SJW? LOL man, you really have serious problems reading...

Sure, it gives some serious clues about your interlocutor's viewpoint. Still stings when you hear a colleague, or worse, an old friend throw around that kind of language, though. :/

Probably one of the most idiotic comparisons I've read online.

But yes, when I ate there when I was a kid. Not anymore since I'm into Strength training and healthy food. I don't get what you and Fenixp are getting at. Sure they have the decision and right to what gets on their store, just like how I have my decisions not to support such practice. If they were really for freedom they would allow most games and let gamers decide, which by the way, they did but didn't follow through.

What exactly was the point of him telling me he is into strength training? :P

-Hey pal, what time is it?
-Half past three, I own a Porsche.

Huh?

Huh? As far as I know, they always have been a heavily curated store. Or for years, at least, since I heard of rejected games and devs since 2010.
And yes, it stings a little when something I want don't come here (happened a lot as GOG and me don't have the same opinion about visual novels, among other genres). But at least the games that DO come here get proper attention.

His body -> strength training
His posts -> mass/volume gain training

Huh?

Same reason you mentioned your bad analogy. You mentioned an unrelated response , while I also mentioned an unrelated response. Simple as that.

It's why I said that GOG then isn't worth it by having a sizeable game library on a platform that could restrict you from (future)games. Which then you would have to technically get elsewhere and have more of a hassle keeping track with different accounts. Other services would be more appealing since it has those games that GOG hasn't banned and much more, so the incentive to build up a GOG library goes away.


Again doesn't make any sense and is a retarded analogy since it's supposed to be a game store that features a variety of different games from different genres and banning games sorely for the excuse of not being "quality"" is purely childish and an idiotic move since the option should be left to the consumers who actually, you know, are the ones spending their money. They did this sorely due to political reasons, why else would they not want to sell games people voted for and wanted.


Doesn't GOG let you vote and decide on which game could be featured or added to the store? Wasn't Hatred wanted and voted by many people on GOG? What about that do you not understand. Beginning to think people on this forum are a bit slow. Or should I say, mentally challenged, for you PC folks out there. :)

Kick her in her girl balls, tinyE.

XD

Another one.

So, who's going to provide support, server space and quality assurance for patches for all those games, all of which GOG does? You? I don't think you realize just how many games are routinely sent to GOG for sale, and that every single game on sale actually comes with running costs. Thanks for the insults tho, always brighten up my evening :-)