Oh cool, most people actively using the term "SJW" in this thread fit the description of an SJW to a letter! See why it's useless?

Actually the term "Social Justice Warriors" sounds so presumptuous and ridiculous ... mostly for the words JUSTICE (seriously is a BIG word) that doesn't match well with "warriors" ... yeah, sure... warriors sitting down comfortably in their homes and offices "fighting the internet" with their Macbooks and their iPads... sic...

Is as childish and stupid as the term "troll"
I do not think that describes "sjw" I think that describes the 99% of the Twitter generation...

I just beat it earlier today and bugs/optimization aside it was a pretty good game. It differentiates itself from the stuff out there well enough and shows off what an indie can do with the Unreal Engine 4. A bit on the short side for $19.99 and needs quite a few fixes and tweaks.

Looking forward to when the new content comes out! :>

call me an immature baby nazi, but troll is a real word, before it became an internet-related term.
http://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/troll

We all know where the word comes from, and that´s why is childish. Extremely Childish IMHO http://media.bizzmarkblog.com/2015/03/troll.jpg

i don't even have a tumblr. wtf are you talking about?

...now if this guy doesn't fit the term "troll", i'll sacrifice a goat to chairman meow.
okay, i'm a child because some hatred fanboys (or do it for the lulz people) from steam post on gog.com forums to call us SJWs? do you enjoy slutshaming too? thanks, Xi Jinping! i like being youthful.

people be making nice games.

nice

games.

people be making them.

they don't get half the sales or half the thread size.

What is your problem?

Who insulted you? I said and I still deeply believe that SJW and TROLL are ridiculous terms for the reasons explained above, as I think the Gamergate is also a childish thing, and the whole "social gaming revolution" is BS, and is just a "marketing" thing like the cigarettes industry used the feminism before to sell smoking as a form of "liberation", beyond all this crap, including Gamergate, these "movements" are just an EGO revolution, with many people earning money from it (or trying) or just people with plenty of free time to make themselves important on Twitter.

By the way is super fanny and ironic that you are not the first ¨SJW¨ that tried to have a ¨vs China¨ argument with me, you guys are SOOOOoooOoo non racist...

I ¨insulted¨ terms, not people. Deal with it, but yes, I found you are childish because of your replies.

PD: Learn to read properly.

Wouldn't it better to strike first at the lower parts of the Murdoch empire? The Sun and the Daily Mail are even more dangerous than the WSJ. ^^

Think of the words used, what they imply, who they are used by. It's neither original nor innocent. Have you ever heard hysterical "SWJ conspiracies" and SWJ labels in other contexts ? Do you think that people going crazy about 'hatred' (and i am sorry, but only the hatred fans are going crazy about hatred here : as mentionned by both sides of the argument to illustrate opposite things, if gog was selling this game here the "forum outrage" would not be comparable at all) have just one shitty game in mind, and aren't just rolling on the momentum of a general feeling of "oppression by the SJW" ? Who are constantly playing the huge victims of "political correctness" ? Where does the expression "political correctness" actually stems from and why ?

This whole psychodrama is broader than this shooter, and this shooter gets overblown as a pathetic little symbol of something else (which it exclusively capitalizes on, making it an automated wallet-vacuum-sucker for idiots, because that's what its business plan amounts to). It is fueled by the frustration of all those who already feel super persecuted by sexism-being-a-thing and other consequence of our society's increasing self-awareness on societal issues. The reflex of screaming "SJW" and barking at "censorship" was already present, and well trained by other pseudo-martyrdoms in different contexts. The whole thought structure, the lexicon, the attitudes, thr rhetorics, it's directly imported to this discussion - or rather the opposite, the question of gog-selling-hatred is directly imported into that big vague protest against the increasing ridicule attached to reactionary clichés, a vague protest with its already-honed code and vocabulary.

The only real offensive thing about 'hatred' is its bet-on-cretins business plan. The hatred-centered question is purely a commercial question : the "right" to sell in every shop (!?) any shit cheaply capitalizing on any trend (here, the pre-existing anti-"SWJ" neurosis) because oh noes one shop not selling my product is an intolerable infrigement on free market. The whole "political" argument around it ("it is censorship on the freedom of expressions on art and ideas and we would totally call amnesty international if they weren't such SJWs") is just an irrelevant, self-serving, hijacking of more important values, on the same mode as the rhetorics of reactionary creeps when they consider they don't get enough media visibility ("stop being intolerant to intolerance").

You used to mock libertarianism, and its rhetorics of pseudo-freedom dismissing everything else. But it is exactly what is at stake here. Both through the pseudo-"freedom of expression" (an old fallacy on so many level : freedom of expression neither is an absolute value nor is endangered in this specific context), and through the obligation to sell whatever product everywhere (there is no such a thing, and there shouldn't be, despite of the freemarket=democray=freemarket rhetorics). "OH NOES SJW DICTATORSHIP" is just the packaging here, but heck, it's flashy, and super flattering (in a very you-are-the-social-justice-warrior way, actually), and it sells. Super well. On some people. Who are not even that numerous after all, desite of the noise they make.

The double standard is, as often pointed out, in why the rejection of a 'hatred' generates a reaction that much more violent than the rejection of a vastly superior 'braid'. Check what notions get mobilised in the defense of 'hatred', and this double standard is explained by the gamergate-ish controversies that have been running and growing in parallel. And these gamergate-ish controversies are deeply rooted in the most archaic reactionary rearguard. The parallels in rhetorics are not fortuitous. It is just a ridiculous mutual piggybacking - with a coin slot on one side.

So yes, the borrowing of arguments and terminologies is quite telling of what is actually at stake, here. Beyond the idiotic a-game-is-not-sold-by-gog anecdote, which, by itself, would have generated only a couple of lines.

Let's not forget my own favorite : "droit de l'homme-iste" ("human rights-ist"). How pathetic is it that THAT became an insult in France -.-

Yeah. But typically, it's used by certain people. And it's a keyword which (like others "elements de langage", as politicians call them) does identify its user, and the geneaology of his discourse...